• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Monitoring disability inclusion: Setting a baseline for South Africa.监测残疾包容情况:为南非设定基线。
Afr J Disabil. 2022 May 27;11:1020. doi: 10.4102/ajod.v11i0.1020. eCollection 2022.
2
Measuring Disability Inclusion: Feasibility of Using Existing Multidimensional Poverty Data in South Africa.衡量残疾包容性:在南非使用现有多维贫困数据的可行性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 22;18(9):4431. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18094431.
3
How people with disabilities experience programs to prevent intimate partner violence across four countries.残障人士在四个国家体验预防亲密伴侣暴力的项目的经历。
Eval Program Plann. 2020 Apr;79:101770. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2019.101770. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
4
Regional patterns of disability-free life expectancy and disability-adjusted life expectancy: global Burden of Disease Study.无残疾预期寿命和伤残调整生命年的区域模式:全球疾病负担研究
Lancet. 1997 May 10;349(9062):1347-52. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)07494-6.
5
Determining the competences of community based workers for disability-inclusive development in rural areas of South Africa, Botswana and Malawi.确定南非、博茨瓦纳和马拉维农村地区社区工作者在促进包容性残疾发展方面的能力。
Rural Remote Health. 2015 Apr-Jun;15(2):2919. Epub 2015 Jun 5.
6
The difference a word makes: responding to questions on 'disability' and 'difficulty' in South Africa.一个词的差别:对南非关于“残疾”和“困难”问题的回应
Disabil Rehabil. 2009;31(1):42-50. doi: 10.1080/09638280802280338.
7
"When I was no longer able to see and walk, that is when I was affected most": experiences of disability in people living with HIV in South Africa.“当我再也看不见、走不了路的时候,那才是我受影响最深的时候”:南非艾滋病毒感染者的残疾经历。
Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(22):2051-60. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2014.993432. Epub 2014 Dec 19.
8
Update on the harmonisation of disability data collection in UK surveys (part 1).英国调查中残疾数据收集的协调更新(第1部分)。
Health Stat Q. 2011 Autumn(51):3-30. doi: 10.1057/hsq.2011.12.
9
Disability in post-earthquake Haiti: prevalence and inequality in access to services.海地地震后的残疾情况:服务获取方面的患病率与不平等现象
Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(12):1082-9. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2014.956186. Epub 2014 Sep 2.
10
Self-identified intervention priorities amongst women with road accident-acquired physical disabilities in South Africa.南非道路交通事故所致身体残疾女性自我认定的干预重点。
Afr J Disabil. 2022 Feb 25;11:867. doi: 10.4102/ajod.v11i0.867. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
How can you be a doctor? Ableism in the workplace.你怎么能成为一名医生呢?职场中的残障歧视。
Afr J Disabil. 2025 Mar 31;14:1588. doi: 10.4102/ajod.v14i0.1588. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Measuring Disability Inclusion: Feasibility of Using Existing Multidimensional Poverty Data in South Africa.衡量残疾包容性:在南非使用现有多维贫困数据的可行性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 22;18(9):4431. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18094431.
2
Participation in employment and day care for adults with intellectual disabilities: Equal access for all?参与就业和日托服务:智力残疾成年人的平等机会?
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2021 May;34(3):752-762. doi: 10.1111/jar.12850. Epub 2020 Dec 13.
3
Inclusion of vulnerable groups in health policies: Regional policies on health priorities in Africa.弱势群体纳入卫生政策:非洲卫生优先事项区域政策
Afr J Disabil. 2013 Jan 22;2(1):40. doi: 10.4102/ajod.v2i1.40. eCollection 2013.
4
Stigma and discrimination related to mental illness in low- and middle-income countries.低收入和中等收入国家中与精神疾病相关的污名化和歧视。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2015 Oct;24(5):382-94. doi: 10.1017/S2045796015000359. Epub 2015 May 4.
5
Disability prevalence among adults: estimates for 54 countries and progress toward a global estimate.成年人中的残疾患病率:54个国家的估计数及全球估计数的进展情况。
Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36(11):940-7. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2013.825333. Epub 2013 Aug 20.
6
The South African Stress and Health (SASH) study: 12-month and lifetime prevalence of common mental disorders.南非压力与健康(SASH)研究:常见精神障碍的12个月患病率及终生患病率
S Afr Med J. 2009 May;99(5 Pt 2):339-44.

监测残疾包容情况:为南非设定基线。

Monitoring disability inclusion: Setting a baseline for South Africa.

作者信息

Suich Helen, Schneider Marguerite

机构信息

Independent Researcher, Canberra, Australia.

Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Alan J Flisher Centre for Public Mental Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.

出版信息

Afr J Disabil. 2022 May 27;11:1020. doi: 10.4102/ajod.v11i0.1020. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.4102/ajod.v11i0.1020
PMID:35747756
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9210175/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The progressive realisation of disability inclusion requires political will and commitment, and comprehensive monitoring is necessary to give a clear understanding of what needs to be addressed and to highlight the gaps and barriers to the achievement of social inclusion of people with disabilities.

OBJECTIVES

This article uses an existing dataset to present a baseline assessment of inclusion for men and women with no, mild or moderate disability severity and with no or moderate affect difficulties in South Africa.

METHODS

An existing dataset, capturing individual-level data for 8499 individuals, collected in 2019 across South Africa was analysed. Variables were utilised to represent aspects of nine domains of disability inclusion, and outcomes were compared using chi-squared tests (with Bonferroni adjustments) for groups categorised by disability severity and gender, and for affect severity and gender.

RESULTS

Overall, inclusion levels declined with increasing disability severity, and there were fewer differences in inclusion levels between those with and without affect difficulties than for those with functioning difficulties (as measured using the Washington Group on Disability Statistics' Short Set of six questions on functioning).

CONCLUSIONS

The article concludes by discussing several approaches to using the data to design policy responses, each of which results in a different range of domains that may initially be prioritised and targeted.

摘要

背景

逐步实现包容残疾需要政治意愿和承诺,全面监测对于清楚了解需要解决的问题以及突出实现残疾人社会包容的差距和障碍至关重要。

目的

本文利用现有数据集对南非残疾严重程度为无、轻度或中度且情感困难程度为无或中度的男性和女性的包容情况进行基线评估。

方法

分析了2019年在南非收集的一个现有数据集,该数据集记录了8499人的个人层面数据。利用变量来代表残疾包容九个领域的各个方面,并使用卡方检验(经邦费罗尼校正)对按残疾严重程度和性别以及情感严重程度和性别分类的组的结果进行比较。

结果

总体而言,包容水平随着残疾严重程度的增加而下降,与有功能困难者(使用华盛顿残疾统计小组关于功能的六个简短问题集衡量)相比,有情感困难者和无情感困难者在包容水平上的差异较小。

结论

本文最后讨论了利用这些数据设计政策应对措施的几种方法,每种方法都会导致一系列不同的可能最初被优先考虑和针对的领域。