• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两家儿童医院临床药师预防用药错误的措施

Medication error prevention by clinical pharmacists in two children's hospitals.

作者信息

Folli H L, Poole R L, Benitz W E, Russo J C

出版信息

Pediatrics. 1987 May;79(5):718-22.

PMID:3575028
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to record prospectively the frequency of and potential harm caused by errant medication orders at two large pediatric hospitals. The objective of the study was to assess the impact of pharmacist intervention in preventing potential harm. The study was conducted during a 6-month period. A total of 281 and 198 errors were detected at the institutions. The overall error rates for the two hospitals were 1.35 and 1.77 per 100-patient days, and 4.9 and 4.5 per 1,000 medication orders, respectively. Pediatric patients aged 2 years and less and pediatric intensive care unit patients received the greatest proportion of errant orders. Neonatal patients received the lowest rate of errant orders. The most common type of error was incorrect dosage, and the most prevalent type of error was overdosage. Antibiotics was the class of drugs for which errant orders were most common. Orders for theophylline, analgesics, and fluid and electrolytes, including hyperalimentation, were also frequently in error. In general, the error rate was greatest among physicians with the least training, but no physician group was error free. Involving pharmacists in reviewing drug orders significantly reduced the potential harm resulting from errant medication orders.

摘要

本研究的目的是前瞻性记录两家大型儿科医院错误医嘱的发生频率及其造成的潜在危害。该研究的目标是评估药剂师干预对预防潜在危害的影响。该研究在6个月期间进行。两家机构共检测到281起和198起错误。两家医院的总体错误率分别为每100个患者日1.35起和1.77起,以及每1000份医嘱4.9起和4.5起。2岁及以下的儿科患者和儿科重症监护病房患者收到的错误医嘱比例最高。新生儿患者收到的错误医嘱率最低。最常见的错误类型是剂量不正确,最普遍的错误类型是用药过量。抗生素是错误医嘱最常见的药物类别。茶碱、镇痛药以及包括胃肠外营养在内的液体和电解质的医嘱也经常出错。一般来说,培训最少的医生的错误率最高,但没有一个医生组是完全无差错的。让药剂师参与审核医嘱显著降低了错误医嘱造成的潜在危害。

相似文献

1
Medication error prevention by clinical pharmacists in two children's hospitals.两家儿童医院临床药师预防用药错误的措施
Pediatrics. 1987 May;79(5):718-22.
2
Prevention of pediatric medication errors by hospital pharmacists and the potential benefit of computerized physician order entry.医院药剂师对儿科用药错误的预防以及计算机化医嘱录入的潜在益处。
Pediatrics. 2007 Jan;119(1):e77-85. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-0034.
3
Characterization of errors detected during central order review.集中医嘱审核期间发现的错误特征分析。
Can J Hosp Pharm. 1992 Oct;45(5):193-7.
4
Justifying a pediatric critical-care satellite pharmacy by medication-error reporting.通过药物错误报告来论证设立儿科重症监护卫星药房的合理性。
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1986 Feb;43(2):368-71.
5
Effect of computer order entry on prevention of serious medication errors in hospitalized children.计算机医嘱录入对预防住院儿童严重用药错误的影响。
Pediatrics. 2008 Mar;121(3):e421-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-0220.
6
Antibiotic misuse in a pediatric teaching hospital.一家儿科教学医院中的抗生素滥用情况。
Can Med Assoc J. 1980 Jan 12;122(1):49-52.
7
Prescribing errors in a pediatric emergency department.儿科急诊科的处方错误。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2008 Jan;24(1):1-8. doi: 10.1097/pec.0b013e31815f6f6c.
8
Towards the reduction of medication errors in orthopedics and spinal surgery: outcomes using a pharmacist-led approach.致力于减少骨科和脊柱外科的用药错误:采用药剂师主导方法的效果
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Jan 1;33(1):104-7. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815e3a5d.
9
2006 national clinical pharmacy services survey: clinical pharmacy services, collaborative drug management, medication errors, and pharmacy technology.2006年全国临床药学服务调查:临床药学服务、药物协同管理、用药差错及药学技术
Pharmacotherapy. 2008 Jan;28(1):1-13. doi: 10.1592/phco.28.1.1.
10
An evaluation of medication errors-the pediatric surgical service experience.用药错误评估——小儿外科服务经验
J Pediatr Surg. 2008 Feb;43(2):348-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2007.10.042.

引用本文的文献

1
Safety of inpatient care in surgical settings: cohort study.外科环境下住院患者的安全性:队列研究。
BMJ. 2024 Nov 13;387:e080480. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2024-080480.
2
Medication Reconciliation as Part of Admission Management-A Survey to Improve Drug Therapy Safety in a Urology Department.作为入院管理一部分的用药核对——一项旨在提高泌尿外科药物治疗安全性的调查
Pharmacy (Basel). 2024 Aug 6;12(4):122. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy12040122.
3
Impact of clinical pharmacist-led intervention for drug-related problems in neonatal intensive care unit a randomized controlled trial.
临床药师主导的干预对新生儿重症监护病房药物相关问题的影响:一项随机对照试验
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Aug 14;14:1242779. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1242779. eCollection 2023.
4
Impact of Clinical Pharmacist Intervention on Clinical Outcomes in the Critical Care Unit, Taif City, Saudi Arabia: A Retrospective Study.沙特阿拉伯塔伊夫市临床药师干预对重症监护病房临床结局的影响:一项回顾性研究
Pharmacy (Basel). 2022 Aug 31;10(5):108. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy10050108.
5
A Survey of Prescription Errors in Paediatric Outpatients in Multi-Primary Care Settings: The Implementation of an Electronic Pre-Prescription System.多基层医疗环境下儿科门诊处方错误的调查:电子预处方系统的实施
Front Pediatr. 2022 Jun 9;10:880928. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.880928. eCollection 2022.
6
Implementing a specialist paediatric clinical pharmacology service in a UK children's hospital.在英国一家儿童医院实施儿科临床药理学专家服务。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Jan;88(1):206-213. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14944. Epub 2021 Aug 22.
7
Description of pharmacists' reported interventions to prevent prescribing errors among in hospital inpatients: a cross sectional retrospective study.医院住院患者中药师报告的预防处方错误干预措施描述:一项横断面回顾性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 May 6;21(1):432. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06418-z.
8
Improving junior doctor medicine prescribing and patient safety: An intervention using personalised, structured, video-enhanced feedback and deliberate practice.提高初级医生的药物处方水平与患者安全:一项采用个性化、结构化、视频增强反馈及刻意练习的干预措施。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2020 Nov;86(11):2234-2246. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14325. Epub 2020 May 18.
9
Incidence and prevalence of intravenous medication errors in the UK: a systematic review.英国静脉药物错误的发生率和流行率:系统评价。
Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2020 Jan;27(1):3-8. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2018-001624. Epub 2018 Oct 23.
10
Evaluating a handheld decision support device in pediatric intensive care settings.在儿科重症监护环境中评估一种手持式决策支持设备。
JAMIA Open. 2019 Jan 4;2(1):49-61. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooy055. eCollection 2019 Apr.