Suppr超能文献

意大利威尼托地区纳武利尤单抗或卡博替尼治疗转移性肾细胞癌(mRCC)的真实世界研究:AMOUR 研究结果。

Real-World Treatment with Nivolumab or Cabozantinib for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC) in the Veneto Region of Italy: Results of AMOUR Study.

机构信息

Oncology 1 Unit, Istituto Oncologico Veneto, IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy.

Oncology 3 Unit, Istituto Oncologico Veneto, IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy.

出版信息

Target Oncol. 2022 Jul;17(4):467-474. doi: 10.1007/s11523-022-00892-z. Epub 2022 Jun 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Second- or third-line treatment options for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) have dramatically changed in the last few years. There are no criteria for the choice between nivolumab and cabozantinib, which both demonstrated overall survival (OS) gain in pivotal trials.

OBJECTIVE

We conducted an analysis of oncological outcomes in patients treated in the Veneto Region (Italy), studying different sequences of TKI-nivolumab-cabozantinib or TKI-cabozantinib-nivolumab in a publicly funded healthcare system.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective, real-world analysis of all consecutive patients with mRCC treated with nivolumab or cabozantinib in 2017-2018 at 19 Oncology Units in the Veneto Region.

RESULTS

We identified 170 patients, 73 % males, median age 68.4 years. All patients started second-line treatment, 59 % received a third-line therapy. Patients with NLR > 3 had a shorter OS (p < 0.0001). In the second-line treatment, nivolumab was administered to 108 patients (63 %), cabozantinib to 29 (17 %); in the third-line treatment nivolumab was administered to 42 patients (25 %), cabozantinib to 49 (29 %). Median OS and PFS in second line treatment were 28.4 and 6.6 months for nivolumab, 16.8 and 6.6 months for cabozantinib. Median OS and PFS in third-line treatment were 27 and 5.2 months for nivolumab, 16.6 and 7.5 months for cabozantinib. Median OS for nivolumab>cabozantinib sequence versus cabozantinib > nivolumab was 28.8 versus 19.9 months (p = 0.2); median PFS for both the sequences were similar at 5.7 months. A cost effectiveness per month of survival of the two sequences analysis was performed: the cost per month for the nivolumab > cabozantinib sequence was 1738.60whereas the cost for the other one was €1624.80.

CONCLUSIONS

In our real-world cohort, most patients received nivolumab as second-line treatment. Outcomes of single drugs are superimposable with those in the published literature. Both the sequences of nivolumab and cabozantinib appear to be viable, effective strategies from an OS and cost-effective perspective.

摘要

背景

在过去的几年中,转移性肾细胞癌(mRCC)的二线或三线治疗选择发生了巨大变化。纳武利尤单抗和卡博替尼都在关键试验中显示出总生存期(OS)获益,但尚无选择这两种药物的标准。

目的

我们在意大利威尼托地区(Veneto Region)进行了一项分析,研究了在公共资助的医疗体系中,TKI-纳武利尤单抗-卡博替尼或 TKI-卡博替尼-纳武利尤单抗不同序列治疗的肿瘤学结局。

患者和方法

我们对 2017 年至 2018 年在威尼托地区 19 个肿瘤学单位接受纳武利尤单抗或卡博替尼治疗的所有连续 mRCC 患者进行了回顾性、真实世界分析。

结果

我们确定了 170 名患者,其中 73%为男性,中位年龄为 68.4 岁。所有患者均开始二线治疗,59%接受三线治疗。中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)>3 的患者 OS 更短(p<0.0001)。二线治疗中,108 名患者(63%)接受纳武利尤单抗治疗,29 名患者(17%)接受卡博替尼治疗;三线治疗中,42 名患者(25%)接受纳武利尤单抗治疗,49 名患者(29%)接受卡博替尼治疗。二线治疗中,纳武利尤单抗的中位 OS 和 PFS 分别为 28.4 个月和 6.6 个月,卡博替尼的分别为 16.8 个月和 6.6 个月。三线治疗中,纳武利尤单抗的中位 OS 和 PFS 分别为 27 个月和 5.2 个月,卡博替尼的分别为 16.6 个月和 7.5 个月。纳武利尤单抗>卡博替尼序贯治疗与卡博替尼>纳武利尤单抗序贯治疗的中位 OS 分别为 28.8 个月和 19.9 个月(p=0.2);两种方案的中位 PFS 相似,均为 5.7 个月。对两种方案的每月生存成本效益进行了分析:纳武利尤单抗>卡博替尼序贯治疗的每月成本为 1738.60 欧元,而其他方案的每月成本为 1624.80 欧元。

结论

在我们的真实世界队列中,大多数患者接受纳武利尤单抗作为二线治疗。单一药物的结果与已发表的文献中的结果相似。纳武利尤单抗和卡博替尼两种方案从 OS 和成本效益的角度来看都是可行的有效策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5f8/9345814/57c4bea54efc/11523_2022_892_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验