Falun Central Hospital, Lasarettsvägen 10, 791 82 Falun, Sweden.
University of Turku, FI-20014 Turun Yliopisto, Finland.
Eur J Radiol. 2022 Sep;154:110394. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110394. Epub 2022 Jun 4.
As we have previously demonstrated, breast cancers originating in the major lactiferous ducts and propagating through the process of neoductgenesis are a distinct subtype of invasive breast cancers, although by current practice they are placed within the group termed ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and are consequently underdiagnosed and undertreated. Imaging biomarkers provide a reliable indication of the site of origin of this breast cancer subtype (Ductal Adenocarcinoma of the breast, DAB) and have excellent concordance with long-term patient outcome. In the present paper, the imaging biomarkers of DAB are described in detail to encourage and facilitate its recognition as a distinct, invasive breast cancer subtype.
Correlation of breast imaging biomarkers with the corresponding histopathological findings using large format technology, with additional evidence from subgross, thick section histopathology to demonstrate the complex three-dimensional structure of the newly formed duct-like structures, neoducts.
There are six imaging biomarkers (mammographic tumour features) of DAB. Four subgroups have characteristic malignant-type calcifications on the mammogram. Two of these are characterized by intraluminal necrosis producing fragmented or dotted casting type calcifications on the mammogram; another two subgroups are characterized by intraductal fluid production which may eventually calcify, producing skipping stone-like or string of pearl-like calcifications. A fifth DAB subgroup presents with bloody or serous nipple discharge and is usually occult on mammography but is detectable with galactography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The sixth subgroup presents as architectural distortion on the mammogram without associated calcifications.
Radiologists can use these well-defined imaging biomarkers to readily detect Ductal Adenocarcinoma of the Breast, DAB. Immunochemical biomarkers are generally not determined from the DAB itself, due to the erroneous assumption that DAB is non-invasive. MRI plays a crucial role in determining disease extent and guiding surgical management. The accumulating evidence that this disease subtype is, in fact, an invasive cancer, necessitates an urgent re-evaluation of the diagnostic and management criteria for this poorly understood malignancy.
正如我们之前所证明的,起源于主要输乳管并通过新导管发生过程传播的乳腺癌是一种独特的浸润性乳腺癌亚型,尽管根据目前的实践,它们被归类为导管原位癌(DCIS),因此被误诊和治疗不足。影像学生物标志物可可靠地指示这种乳腺癌亚型(乳腺导管腺癌,DAB)的起源部位,并与长期患者预后具有极好的一致性。在本文中,详细描述了 DAB 的影像学生物标志物,以鼓励和促进其作为一种独特的浸润性乳腺癌亚型的识别。
使用大格式技术将乳腺影像学生物标志物与相应的组织病理学发现相关联,并通过亚大体、厚切片组织病理学获得额外证据,以证明新形成的导管样结构(新导管)的复杂三维结构。
DAB 有六个影像学生物标志物(乳房 X 线摄影肿瘤特征)。四个亚组在乳房 X 线摄影上具有特征性的恶性型钙化。其中两个亚组的特征是腔内坏死,在乳房 X 线摄影上产生碎片状或点状铸型钙化;另外两个亚组的特征是导管内液体产生,最终可能钙化,产生跳跃石样或串珠样钙化。第五个 DAB 亚组表现为血性或浆液性乳头溢液,通常在乳房 X 线摄影上是隐匿的,但可以通过乳管造影和磁共振成像(MRI)检测到。第六个亚组在乳房 X 线摄影上表现为结构扭曲,无相关钙化。
放射科医生可以使用这些定义明确的影像学生物标志物来快速检测乳腺导管腺癌(DAB)。由于错误地假设 DAB 是非浸润性的,因此通常不会从 DAB 本身确定免疫化学生物标志物。MRI 在确定疾病范围和指导手术管理方面发挥着至关重要的作用。越来越多的证据表明,这种疾病亚型实际上是一种浸润性癌症,因此迫切需要重新评估对这种了解甚少的恶性肿瘤的诊断和管理标准。