Asia-Pacific Centre for Animal Health, Melbourne Veterinary School, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
The University of Queensland, Centre for Animal Science, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, St Lucia and Gatton, Queensland, Australia; The University of Queensland, School of Veterinary Science, Gatton, Queensland, Australia.
Prev Vet Med. 2022 Aug;205:105694. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2022.105694. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
The MilA ELISA has been identified as a highly effective diagnostic tool for the detection of Mycoplasma bovis specific antibodies and has been validated for serological use in previous studies. This study aimed to estimate the optimal cut-off and corresponding estimates of diagnostic sensitivity (DSe) and diagnostic specificity (DSp) of the MilA ELISA for testing bovine serum. Serum samples from 298 feedlot cattle from 14 feedlots across four Australian states were tested on entry into the feedlot and approximately 42 days later. The paired serum samples were tested with the MilA ELISA, BIO K302 (Bio-X Diagnostics, Belgium) and BIO K260 (Bio-X Diagnostics, Belgium). A cut-off of 135 AU was estimated to be optimal using Bayesian latent class analysis with three tests in multiple populations, accounting for conditional dependence between tests. At this cut-off, the DSe and DSp of the MilA ELISA were estimated to be 92.1 % (95 % highest probability density [HPD] interval: 87.4, 95.8) and 95.5 % (95 % HPD: 92.4, 97.8), respectively. The DSes of the BIO K260 and BIO K302 ELISAs were estimated to be 60.5 % (95 % HPD: 54.0, 66.9) and 44.6 % (95 % HPD: 38.7, 50.7), respectively. DSps were 95.6 % (95 % HPD: 92.9, 97.7) and 97.8 % (95 % HPD: 95.9, 99.0), respectively. Mycoplasma bovis seroprevalence was remarkably high at follow-up after 42 days on the feedlots. Overall, this study estimated a cut-off, DSe and DSp for the MilA ELISA with less dependence on prior information than previous analyses and demonstrated that the MilA ELISA has higher DSe than the BIO K260 and BIO K302 assays.
MilA ELISA 已被确定为一种非常有效的检测牛支原体特异性抗体的诊断工具,并且在以前的研究中已经验证了其血清学用途。本研究旨在估计 MilA ELISA 检测牛血清的最佳截断值和相应的诊断敏感性(DSe)和诊断特异性(DSp)估计值。来自澳大利亚四个州的 14 个饲养场的 298 头育肥牛的血清样本在进入饲养场时和大约 42 天后进行了检测。配对的血清样本用 MilA ELISA、BIO K302(比利时生物-X 诊断公司)和 BIO K260(比利时生物-X 诊断公司)进行了检测。使用贝叶斯潜在类别分析,在多个群体中使用三种检测方法,考虑到检测之间的条件依赖性,估计截断值为 135 AU 是最优的。在这个截断值下,MilA ELISA 的 DSe 和 DSp 估计值分别为 92.1%(95%最高概率密度[HPD]区间:87.4、95.8)和 95.5%(95%HPD:92.4、97.8)。BIO K260 和 BIO K302 ELISA 的 DSe 估计值分别为 60.5%(95%HPD:54.0、66.9)和 44.6%(95%HPD:38.7、50.7)。DSp 分别为 95.6%(95%HPD:92.9、97.7)和 97.8%(95%HPD:95.9、99.0)。在饲养场饲养 42 天后的后续检测中,牛支原体血清阳性率非常高。总的来说,本研究估计了 MilA ELISA 的截断值、DSe 和 DSp,与以前的分析相比,该方法对先验信息的依赖性更小,并表明 MilA ELISA 的 DSe 高于 BIO K260 和 BIO K302 检测方法。