• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较和优化使用幼畜血清的牛支原体抗体 ELISA 筛查截断值。

Comparison and optimisation of screening cutoff values for Mycoplasma bovis antibody ELISAs using serum from youngstock.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Reproduction, and Population Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.

出版信息

Vet Rec. 2022 Nov;191(9):e2179. doi: 10.1002/vetr.2179. Epub 2022 Sep 6.

DOI:10.1002/vetr.2179
PMID:36065576
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mycoplasma bovis-associated disease can cause tremendous production losses, welfare issues and high antimicrobial use. Therefore, screening cattle for M. bovis antibodies before entering the herd is a popular and possibly cost-efficient way to reduce disease introduction. However, interpretation of results can be challenging due to variable accuracy between tests and populations. This study's objectives were to compare the diagnostic test accuracy of three commercially available M. bovis antibody ELISAs (ID-screen, Bio K302 and Bio K432) and to explore optimal cutoff values for screening purposes.

METHODS

A prospective diagnostic test accuracy study was performed on 170 serum samples from youngstock using Bayesian latent class modelling. Samples were categorised using manufacturer and generated cutoff values.

RESULTS

Using the manufacturers' guidelines, ID-screen, Bio K432 and Bio K302 showed 97.6%, 67.4% and 33.6% sensitivity, and 78.8%, 97.6% and 99.1% specificity, respectively. Optimised cutoffs resulted in 94.8%, 82.6% and 78.3% sensitivity, and 94.2%, 92.5% and 79.4% specificity, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The highest diagnostic accuracy for detecting M. bovis antibodies was obtained by ID-screen (≥110%). However, by adjusting cutoff values, the sensitivity of Bio-X tests could be markedly increased, making these tests also applicable as screening tools.

LIMITATIONS

Interpretation needs to be careful as antibodies may be linked to both infectious and non-infectious status.

摘要

背景

牛支原体相关疾病可导致巨大的生产损失、福利问题和高抗菌药物使用。因此,在牛群中引入之前对牛进行牛支原体抗体筛查是一种流行且可能具有成本效益的方法,可降低疾病的引入。然而,由于不同测试和群体之间的准确性存在差异,因此对结果的解释可能具有挑战性。本研究的目的是比较三种市售牛支原体抗体 ELISA(ID-screen、Bio K302 和 Bio K432)的诊断测试准确性,并探索用于筛查的最佳截断值。

方法

使用贝叶斯潜在类别建模对来自牛犊的 170 份血清样本进行了前瞻性诊断测试准确性研究。使用制造商和生成的截断值对样本进行分类。

结果

使用制造商的指南,ID-screen、Bio K432 和 Bio K302 的敏感性分别为 97.6%、67.4%和 33.6%,特异性分别为 78.8%、97.6%和 99.1%。优化的截断值分别导致敏感性为 94.8%、82.6%和 78.3%,特异性为 94.2%、92.5%和 79.4%。

结论

检测牛支原体抗体的最高诊断准确性是通过 ID-screen(≥110%)获得的。然而,通过调整截断值,可以显著提高 Bio-X 测试的敏感性,使其也可作为筛查工具。

局限性

需要谨慎解释,因为抗体可能与传染性和非传染性状态有关。

相似文献

1
Comparison and optimisation of screening cutoff values for Mycoplasma bovis antibody ELISAs using serum from youngstock.比较和优化使用幼畜血清的牛支原体抗体 ELISA 筛查截断值。
Vet Rec. 2022 Nov;191(9):e2179. doi: 10.1002/vetr.2179. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
2
Diagnostic performance of Mycoplasmopsis bovis antibody ELISA tests on bulk tank milk from dairy herds.牛支原体抗体酶联免疫吸附试验检测奶牛群牛奶的诊断性能。
BMC Vet Res. 2024 Mar 5;20(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12917-024-03927-x.
3
A European inter-laboratory trial to evaluate the performance of three serological methods for diagnosis of Mycoplasma bovis infection in cattle using latent class analysis.一项采用潜在类别分析评估三种血清学方法用于牛支原体感染诊断的欧洲实验室间试验。
BMC Vet Res. 2019 Oct 25;15(1):369. doi: 10.1186/s12917-019-2117-0.
4
Estimation of sensitivity and specificity of bulk tank milk PCR and 2 antibody ELISA tests for herd-level diagnosis of Mycoplasma bovis infection using Bayesian latent class analysis.使用贝叶斯潜在类别分析估计群体水平牛支原体感染的牛奶 PCR 和 2 种抗体 ELISA 检测的敏感性和特异性。
J Dairy Sci. 2024 Oct;107(10):8464-8478. doi: 10.3168/jds.2023-24590. Epub 2024 Jun 6.
5
Bayesian latent class analysis to estimate the optimal cut-off for the MilA ELISA for the detection of Mycoplasma bovis antibodies in sera, accounting for repeated measures.贝叶斯潜在类别分析估计了 MilA ELISA 检测牛支原体血清抗体的最佳截断值,考虑了重复测量。
Prev Vet Med. 2022 Aug;205:105694. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2022.105694. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
6
Bulk tank milk antibody ELISA as a biosecurity tool for detecting dairy herds with past exposure to Mycoplasma bovis.牛支原体既往感染奶牛群的生物安全检测工具:牛奶抗体酶联免疫吸附试验
J Dairy Sci. 2017 Oct;100(10):8296-8309. doi: 10.3168/jds.2016-12468. Epub 2017 Aug 2.
7
Evaluation of an IgG Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay as a Serological Assay for Detection of Mycoplasma bovis Infection in Feedlot Cattle.评估一种IgG酶联免疫吸附测定法作为检测饲养场牛支原体牛感染的血清学检测方法。
J Clin Microbiol. 2016 May;54(5):1269-75. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02492-15. Epub 2016 Feb 24.
8
Bayesian diagnostic test evaluation and true prevalence estimation of mycoplasma bovis in dairy herds.贝叶斯诊断检测评估和牛支原体在奶牛群中的真实流行率估计。
Prev Vet Med. 2023 Jul;216:105946. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2023.105946. Epub 2023 May 18.
9
Evaluation of the accuracy of the IDvet serological test for Mycoplasma bovis infection in cattle using latent class analysis of paired serum ELISA and quantitative real-time PCR on tonsillar swabs sampled at slaughter.应用潜伏类分析对屠宰时扁桃体拭子采集的配对血清酶联免疫吸附试验和定量实时 PCR 检测牛支原体感染 IDvet 血清学试验的准确性进行评估。
PLoS One. 2023 May 11;18(5):e0285598. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285598. eCollection 2023.
10
Mycoplasma bovis antibody dynamics in naturally exposed dairy calves according to two diagnostic tests.根据两种诊断测试,自然暴露的奶牛犊牛中牛支原体抗体的动态变化。
BMC Vet Res. 2018 Aug 30;14(1):258. doi: 10.1186/s12917-018-1574-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Accuracy of two Sepsityper MALDI-TOF MS methods for bacterial identification in bloodstream infections in dogs, foals, and calves using Bayesian latent class model.使用贝叶斯潜在类别模型的两种Sepsityper基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱方法对犬、驹和犊牛血流感染中细菌鉴定的准确性
Vet Q. 2025 Dec;45(1):2538873. doi: 10.1080/01652176.2025.2538873. Epub 2025 Aug 17.
2
Diagnostic performance of Mycoplasmopsis bovis antibody ELISA tests on bulk tank milk from dairy herds.牛支原体抗体酶联免疫吸附试验检测奶牛群牛奶的诊断性能。
BMC Vet Res. 2024 Mar 5;20(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12917-024-03927-x.