National Drug & Alcohol Research Centre, UNSW Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.
National Centre For Youth Substance Use Research, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4067, Australia.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2022 Aug 1;237:109533. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2022.109533. Epub 2022 Jun 11.
Supply of alcohol to adolescents is associated with increased alcohol consumption and harms including alcohol use disorder (AUD). We aimed to identify: (1) trajectories of alcohol supply to adolescents; (2) sociodemographic characteristics associated with supply trajectory; (3) patterns of alcohol consumption by supply trajectory; and (4) supply trajectory associations with adverse alcohol outcomes.
We used Australian longitudinal survey data (N = 1813) to model latent trajectories of parent and peer alcohol supply over five annual follow-ups (Waves 2-6; M 13.9-17.8 years). Regression models assessed associations between supply trajectories and Wave 1 (M=12.9 years) sociodemographic factors and associations between supply trajectories and Wave 7 (M=18.8 years) alcohol outcomes.
We identified five alcohol supply classes: (1) minimal supply (n = 739, 40.8%); (2) early parent sips, late peer/parent whole drinks (n = 254, 14.0%); (3) late peer/parent whole drinks (n = 419, 23.1%); (4) early parent sips, mid peer/parent whole drinks (n = 293, 16.2%); (5) early peer/parent whole drinks (n = 108, 6.0%). Compared to minimal supply, the other classes were 2.7-12.9 times as likely to binge drink, 1.6-3.0 times as likely to experience alcohol-related harms, and 2.1-8.6 times as likely to report AUD symptoms at age 19.
Earlier supply of whole drinks, particularly from peers, was associated with increased risk of early adulthood adverse alcohol outcomes. While minimal supply represented the lowest risk, supplying sips only in early-mid adolescence and delaying supply of whole drinks until late adolescence is likely to be less risky than earlier supply of whole drinks.
向青少年供应酒精会导致饮酒量增加和伤害,包括酒精使用障碍(AUD)。我们旨在确定:(1)青少年酒精供应的轨迹;(2)与供应轨迹相关的社会人口特征;(3)按供应轨迹划分的饮酒模式;(4)供应轨迹与不良酒精结果的关联。
我们使用澳大利亚纵向调查数据(N=1813),在五次年度随访(波 2-6;M 13.9-17.8 岁)中对父母和同伴酒精供应的潜在轨迹进行建模。回归模型评估了供应轨迹与波 1(M=12.9 岁)社会人口学因素之间的关联,以及供应轨迹与波 7(M=18.8 岁)酒精结果之间的关联。
我们确定了五种酒精供应类别:(1)最小供应(n=739,40.8%);(2)早期父母小口饮酒,晚期同伴/父母整杯饮酒(n=254,14.0%);(3)晚期同伴/父母整杯饮酒(n=419,23.1%);(4)早期父母小口饮酒,中期同伴/父母整杯饮酒(n=293,16.2%);(5)早期同伴/父母整杯饮酒(n=108,6.0%)。与最小供应相比,其他类别 binge 饮酒的可能性是其 2.7-12.9 倍,发生酒精相关伤害的可能性是其 1.6-3.0 倍,19 岁时报告 AUD 症状的可能性是其 2.1-8.6 倍。
更早供应整杯酒,特别是来自同伴的供应,与成年早期不良酒精结果的风险增加有关。虽然最小供应代表的风险最低,但仅在青少年早期供应小口酒,并将整杯酒的供应推迟到青少年晚期,可能比更早供应整杯酒的风险更低。