• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与 USPSTF 筛查建议相关的保险患者前列腺癌生存率变化。

Changes in prostate cancer survival among insured patients in relation to USPSTF screening recommendations.

机构信息

Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.

Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Rutgers School of Public Health, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, USA.

出版信息

BMC Urol. 2022 Jun 25;22(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12894-022-01045-0.

DOI:10.1186/s12894-022-01045-0
PMID:35752822
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9233816/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To investigate the effects of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force's (USPSTF) 2012 recommendation against prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based screening for prostate cancer on survival disparities based on insurance status. Prior to the USPSTF's 2012 screening recommendation, previous studies found that insured patients with prostate cancer had better outcomes than uninsured patients.

METHODS

Using the SEER 18 database, we examined prostate cancer-specific survival (PCSS) based on diagnostic time period and insurance status. Patients were designated as belonging to the pre-USPSTF era if diagnosed in 2010-2012 or post-USPSTF era if diagnosed in 2014-2016. PCSS was measured with the Kaplan-Meier method, while disparities were measured with the Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

During the pre-USPSTF era, uninsured patients experienced worse PCSS compared to insured patients (adjusted HR 1.256, 95% CI 1.037-1.520, p = 0.020). This survival disparity was no longer observed during the post-USPSTF era as a result of decreased PCSS among insured patients combined with unchanged PCSS among uninsured patients (adjusted HR 0.946, 95% CI 0.642-1.394, p = 0.780).

CONCLUSIONS

Although the underlying reasons are not clear, the USPSTF's 2012 PSA screening recommendation may have hindered insured patients from being regularly screened for prostate cancer and selectively led to worse outcomes for insured patients without affecting the survival of uninsured patients.

摘要

背景

为了探究美国预防服务工作组(USPSTF)2012 年反对基于前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)的前列腺癌筛查建议对保险状况导致的生存差异的影响。在 USPSTF 2012 年的筛查建议之前,先前的研究发现,患有前列腺癌的参保患者的预后比未参保患者好。

方法

我们使用 SEER 18 数据库,根据诊断时间和保险状况检查前列腺癌特异性生存(PCSS)。如果患者在 2010-2012 年被诊断为属于 USPSTF 前时代,如果在 2014-2016 年被诊断为属于 USPSTF 后时代。采用 Kaplan-Meier 方法测量 PCSS,采用 Cox 比例风险模型测量差异。

结果

在 USPSTF 前时代,未参保患者的 PCSS 比参保患者差(调整后的 HR 1.256,95%CI 1.037-1.520,p=0.020)。由于参保患者的 PCSS 下降,而未参保患者的 PCSS 不变,因此,在 USPSTF 后时代,这种生存差异不再存在(调整后的 HR 0.946,95%CI 0.642-1.394,p=0.780)。

结论

尽管原因尚不清楚,但 USPSTF 2012 年 PSA 筛查建议可能阻碍了参保患者定期接受前列腺癌筛查,并选择性地导致参保患者的预后恶化,而未影响未参保患者的生存。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e46/9233816/915671270c93/12894_2022_1045_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e46/9233816/3a169704a65b/12894_2022_1045_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e46/9233816/915671270c93/12894_2022_1045_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e46/9233816/3a169704a65b/12894_2022_1045_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e46/9233816/915671270c93/12894_2022_1045_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Changes in prostate cancer survival among insured patients in relation to USPSTF screening recommendations.与 USPSTF 筛查建议相关的保险患者前列腺癌生存率变化。
BMC Urol. 2022 Jun 25;22(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12894-022-01045-0.
2
Abrogation of survival disparity between Black and White individuals after the USPSTF's 2012 prostate-specific antigen-based prostate cancer screening recommendation.USPSTF 2012 年基于前列腺特异性抗原的前列腺癌筛查建议发布后,黑人和白人个体之间生存差异的消除。
Cancer. 2020 Dec 1;126(23):5114-5123. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33179. Epub 2020 Sep 5.
3
Racial disparities in prostate cancer outcome among prostate-specific antigen screening eligible populations in the United States.美国前列腺特异性抗原筛查合格人群中前列腺癌结局的种族差异。
Ann Oncol. 2017 May 1;28(5):1098-1104. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx041.
4
PSA screening, prostate biopsy, and treatment of prostate cancer in the years surrounding the USPSTF recommendation against prostate cancer screening.美国预防服务工作组建议反对前列腺癌筛查后,对前列腺特异性抗原筛查、前列腺活检和前列腺癌治疗的相关情况。
Cancer. 2018 Jul 1;124(13):2733-2739. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31337. Epub 2018 May 21.
5
Changes in Prostate-Specific Antigen Testing Relative to the Revised US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation on Prostate Cancer Screening.前列腺特异性抗原检测的变化与美国预防服务工作组修订的前列腺癌筛查建议有关。
JAMA Oncol. 2022 Jan 1;8(1):41-47. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.5143.
6
Screening for Prostate Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.前列腺癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
JAMA. 2018 May 8;319(18):1901-1913. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.3710.
7
Association of the USPSTF Grade D Recommendation Against Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening With Prostate Cancer-Specific Mortality.USPSTF 不推荐前列腺特异性抗原筛查等级 D 与前列腺癌特异性死亡率的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 May 2;5(5):e2211869. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.11869.
8
Prostate Needle Biopsy Outcomes in the Era of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation against Prostate Specific Antigen Based Screening.美国预防服务工作组建议反对基于前列腺特异性抗原的筛查时代的前列腺穿刺活检结果
J Urol. 2016 Jan;195(1):66-73. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.07.099. Epub 2015 Aug 6.
9
Impact of Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Screening Trials and Revised PSA Screening Guidelines on Rates of Prostate Biopsy and Postbiopsy Complications.前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)筛查试验和修订的 PSA 筛查指南对前列腺活检率和活检后并发症的影响。
Eur Urol. 2017 Jan;71(1):55-65. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.03.015. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
10
Trends in clinical and oncological outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy before and after the 2012 US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation against PSA screening: a decade of experience.2012 年美国预防服务工作组建议反对 PSA 筛查后,机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的临床和肿瘤学结果趋势:十年经验。
BJU Int. 2020 Jun;125(6):884-892. doi: 10.1111/bju.15051. Epub 2020 Apr 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Prostate-specific antigen testing in the United States during 2008-2022 in relation to the US preventive services task force recommendations.2008年至2022年期间美国前列腺特异性抗原检测与美国预防服务工作组建议的关系。
Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 28;14(1):31345. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-82821-w.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of the evolving United States Preventative Services Task Force policy statements on incidence and distribution of prostate cancer over 15 years in a statewide cancer registry.美国预防服务工作组不断演变的政策声明对一个全州癌症登记处15年间前列腺癌发病率和分布的影响。
Prostate Int. 2021 Mar;9(1):12-17. doi: 10.1016/j.prnil.2020.06.002. Epub 2020 Jul 5.
2
The Effect of Payer Status on Survival of Patients With Prostate Cancer.支付者状态对前列腺癌患者生存的影响。
Cureus. 2021 Feb 13;13(2):e13329. doi: 10.7759/cureus.13329.
3
Cancer Statistics, 2021.
癌症统计数据,2021.
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 Jan;71(1):7-33. doi: 10.3322/caac.21654. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
4
Racial disparities in mortality for patients with prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.根治性前列腺切除术后前列腺癌患者的死亡率存在种族差异。
Cancer. 2021 May 1;127(9):1517-1528. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33152. Epub 2020 Sep 8.
5
Abrogation of survival disparity between Black and White individuals after the USPSTF's 2012 prostate-specific antigen-based prostate cancer screening recommendation.USPSTF 2012 年基于前列腺特异性抗原的前列腺癌筛查建议发布后,黑人和白人个体之间生存差异的消除。
Cancer. 2020 Dec 1;126(23):5114-5123. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33179. Epub 2020 Sep 5.
6
Ethnicity and insurance status predict metastatic disease presentation in prostate, breast, and non-small cell lung cancer.种族和保险状况预测前列腺癌、乳腺癌和非小细胞肺癌的转移性疾病表现。
Cancer Med. 2020 Aug;9(15):5362-5380. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3109. Epub 2020 Jun 8.
7
Prostate cancer incidence across stage, NCCN risk groups, and age before and after USPSTF Grade D recommendations against prostate-specific antigen screening in 2012.2012 年 USPSTF 发布 D 级前列腺特异性抗原筛查建议后,按阶段、NCCN 风险分组和年龄划分的前列腺癌发病率。
Cancer. 2020 Feb 15;126(4):717-724. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32604. Epub 2019 Dec 3.
8
Insurance Coverage, and Having a Regular Provider, and Utilization of Cancer Follow-up and Noncancer Health Care Among Childhood Cancer Survivors.保险覆盖范围、拥有固定医疗服务提供者以及儿童癌症幸存者的癌症随访和非癌症医疗保健利用情况。
Inquiry. 2019 Jan-Dec;56:46958018817996. doi: 10.1177/0046958018817996.
9
Use of Active Surveillance or Watchful Waiting for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer and Management Trends Across Risk Groups in the United States, 2010-2015.美国 2010-2015 年低危前列腺癌的主动监测或观察等待使用情况和各风险组的管理趋势
JAMA. 2019 Feb 19;321(7):704-706. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.19941.
10
Prostate cancer screening with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test: a systematic review and meta-analysis.前列腺癌筛查中前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)检测的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2018 Sep 5;362:k3519. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k3519.