Department of Gynecological, Obstetrical and Urological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Italy.
Department of Gynecological, Obstetrical and Urological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Italy.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2022 Aug;275:64-69. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.06.004. Epub 2022 Jun 8.
Surgery is the mainstay of treatment in the management of early-stage cervical cancer. Until the publication of the Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer (LACC) trial, minimally invasive radical hysterectomy was the recommended approach to treat patients with early-stage disease. The results of the LACC trial questioned the adoption of minimally invasive surgery in cervical cancer. In comparison with the open approach, minimally invasive surgery correlated with worse disease-free and cancer-specific survival. Similarly, other retrospective studies highlighted this correlation, thus corroborating the results of the LACC trials. In the present review, we evaluated current evidence and further prospective of the adoption of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer. Moreover, we sought to assess some unsolved issues regarding the role of minimally invasive surgery in early-stage cervical cancer patients.
手术是治疗早期宫颈癌的主要方法。直到腹腔镜治疗宫颈癌(LACC)试验的发表,微创根治性子宫切除术才被推荐用于治疗早期疾病的患者。LACC 试验的结果对采用微创治疗宫颈癌提出了质疑。与开放手术相比,微创手术与较差的无病生存率和癌症特异性生存率相关。同样,其他回顾性研究也强调了这一相关性,从而证实了 LACC 试验的结果。在本综述中,我们评估了微创根治性子宫切除术在宫颈癌中的应用的现有证据和进一步的前景。此外,我们还试图评估微创治疗在早期宫颈癌患者中的作用方面存在的一些尚未解决的问题。