• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Comparison of outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation following home versus non-home discharge.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后家庭出院与非家庭出院的结局比较。
Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2022 May 16;35(4):428-433. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2022.2064581. eCollection 2022.
2
Discharge Location and Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后的出院地点和结局。
Am J Cardiol. 2021 Feb 1;140:95-102. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.10.058. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
3
Comparison of Sex-Based Differences in Home or Nonhome Discharge Utilization of Rehabilitative Services and Outcomes Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in the United States.比较美国经导管主动脉瓣植入术后基于性别的家庭或非家庭康复服务利用和结局差异。
Am J Cardiol. 2019 Jun 15;123(12):1983-1991. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.03.008. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
4
Impact of Discharge Location After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement on 1-Year Outcomes in Women: Results From the WIN-TAVI Registry.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后出院地点对女性患者 1 年结局的影响:来自 WIN-TAVI 注册研究的结果。
Can J Cardiol. 2019 Feb;35(2):199-207. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2018.11.035. Epub 2018 Dec 12.
5
Elevation of B-Type Natriuretic Peptide at Discharge is Associated With 2-Year Mortality After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis: Insights From a Multicenter Prospective OCEAN-TAVI (Optimized Transcatheter Valvular Intervention-Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation) Registry.重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者经导管主动脉瓣置换术后出院时B型利钠肽升高与2年死亡率相关:来自多中心前瞻性OCEAN-TAVI(优化经导管瓣膜干预-经导管主动脉瓣植入)注册研究的见解
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Jul 14;6(7):e006112. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.006112.
6
The relationship between discharge location and cardiac rehabilitation use after cardiac surgery.心脏手术后出院地点与心脏康复利用之间的关系。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2025 May;169(5):1513-1521.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.03.024. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
7
A 3-center comparison of 1-year mortality outcomes between transcatheter aortic valve implantation and surgical aortic valve replacement on the basis of propensity score matching among intermediate-risk surgical patients.基于中危手术患者的倾向评分匹配,对经导管主动脉瓣植入术与外科主动脉瓣置换术的 1 年死亡率结果进行的 3 中心比较。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 May;6(5):443-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.01.136.
8
The hospital results and 1-year outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve procedures and transcatheter aortic valve implantations in the native valves: the results from the Swiss-TAVI Registry.经导管主动脉瓣瓣中瓣手术和经导管主动脉瓣植入术在原瓣膜中的医院结果和 1 年结局:来自瑞士 TAVI 注册研究的结果。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019 Jul 1;56(1):55-63. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezy471.
9
Hospital Practice of Direct-Home Discharge and 30-Day Readmission After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapy (STS/ACC TVT) Registry.经胸主动脉瓣置换术协会/美国心脏病学会经导管瓣膜治疗(STS/ACC TVT)注册中心的直接出院和 30 天内再入院的医院实践。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Aug 21;6(8):e006127. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.006127.
10
Pre-procedural CT angiography inferior vena cava measurements: a predictor of mortality in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation.经导管主动脉瓣植入术前 CT 血管造影下腔静脉测量:预测患者死亡率的指标。
Eur Radiol. 2019 Feb;29(2):975-984. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5613-x. Epub 2018 Jul 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Discharge disposition of older patients undergoing trans-catheter aortic valve replacement and its impact on survival.老年经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者的出院去向及其对生存的影响。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Sep 1;94(3):448-455. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28069. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
2
Predictors of 1-year mortality after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后1年死亡率的预测因素
J Card Surg. 2018 May;33(5):243-249. doi: 10.1111/jocs.13574. Epub 2018 Apr 13.
3
Description of a Method to Obtain Complete One-Year Follow-Up in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry.胸外科医师协会/美国心脏病学会经导管瓣膜治疗注册研究中获取完整一年随访的方法描述
Am J Cardiol. 2018 Mar 15;121(6):758-761. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.11.046. Epub 2018 Jan 2.
4
Society of Thoracic Surgeons Score Variance Results in Risk Reclassification of Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.胸外科医师学会评分差异导致行经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者的风险再分类。
JAMA Cardiol. 2017 Apr 1;2(4):455-456. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2016.4132.
5
Days Spent at Home - A Patient-Centered Goal and Outcome.居家天数——以患者为中心的目标与结果。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Oct 27;375(17):1610-1612. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1607206.
6
Predicting Early and Late Mortality After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后早期和晚期死亡率预测。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Jul 26;68(4):343-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.04.057.
7
Development and Validation of a Risk Prediction Model for In-Hospital Mortality After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后住院死亡率风险预测模型的建立与验证。
JAMA Cardiol. 2016 Apr 1;1(1):46-52. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2015.0326.
8
Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic-Valve Replacement in Intermediate-Risk Patients.经导管主动脉瓣置换术或外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗中危患者。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Apr 28;374(17):1609-20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1514616. Epub 2016 Apr 2.
9
Clinical outcomes at 1 year following transcatheter aortic valve replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术 1 年后的临床结果。
JAMA. 2015 Mar 10;313(10):1019-28. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.1474.
10
Risk of not being discharged home after isolated coronary artery bypass graft operations.孤立性冠状动脉旁路移植术后未出院的风险。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2013 Oct;96(4):1287-1292. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.05.042. Epub 2013 Aug 21.

经导管主动脉瓣植入术后家庭出院与非家庭出院的结局比较。

Comparison of outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation following home versus non-home discharge.

作者信息

Hebeler Katherine R, Ogola Gerald, Filardo Giovanni, Mack Michael, Stoler Robert, Mixon Timothy, Szerlip Molly, Edgerton James, Hebeler Robert F

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.

Department of Surgery, Baylor Scott & White Research Institute, Dallas, Texas.

出版信息

Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2022 May 16;35(4):428-433. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2022.2064581. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1080/08998280.2022.2064581
PMID:35754575
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9196721/
Abstract

As more patients undergo transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), knowledge of 1-year mortality and associated factors becomes increasingly important. After other cardiac procedures, discharge location has been shown to be associated with 1-year mortality. We examined outcomes of TAVI patients discharged home vs an extended care facility (ECF). All TAVI patients from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2017, were evaluated. Cox proportional hazard regression models with cubic splines were used to estimate the adjusted effect of discharge to ECF on 1-year mortality. A total of 957 (85.6%) patients discharged home were compared to 160 (14.3%) discharged to ECF. On univariate analysis, patients discharged home were younger and had a lower Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality, higher albumin, and fewer vascular complications and strokes. Patients discharged to ECF had a higher 30-day mortality (3.8% vs. 0.5%,  = 0.001) and 1-year mortality (25.7% vs. 8.3%,  < 0.001). Cox proportional hazard regression models showed increased risk of 1-year mortality for patients discharged to ECF. In conclusion, patients discharged to ECF had a higher 30-day and 1-year mortality. The strongest predictor of 1-year mortality was discharge to ECF. Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality score was not a predictor of 1-year mortality.

摘要

随着越来越多的患者接受经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI),了解1年死亡率及相关因素变得越发重要。在接受其他心脏手术后,出院地点已被证明与1年死亡率相关。我们研究了出院回家与入住长期护理机构(ECF)的TAVI患者的结局。对2012年1月1日至2017年12月31日期间所有的TAVI患者进行了评估。使用带有三次样条的Cox比例风险回归模型来估计入住ECF对1年死亡率的调整效应。将总共957名(85.6%)出院回家的患者与160名(14.3%)入住ECF的患者进行了比较。单因素分析显示,出院回家的患者更年轻,胸外科医师协会预测的死亡风险更低,白蛋白水平更高,血管并发症和中风更少。入住ECF的患者30天死亡率(3.8%对0.5%,P = 0.001)和1年死亡率(25.7%对8.3%,P < 0.001)更高。Cox比例风险回归模型显示,入住ECF的患者1年死亡风险增加。总之,入住ECF的患者30天和1年死亡率更高。1年死亡率的最强预测因素是入住ECF。胸外科医师协会预测的死亡风险评分不是1年死亡率的预测因素。