Sharma Medhavi, Sharma Gaurav, Verma Anjana
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, P.D.U. Medical College, Rajkot, Gujarat, India.
Department of Physiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rajkot, Gujarat, India.
Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2022 Apr-Jun;12(2):76-81. doi: 10.4103/ijabmr.ijabmr_452_21. Epub 2022 May 10.
Antenatal fetal surveillance is a field of increasing importance in modern obstetrics. It is based on fetal heart rate monitoring using nonstress test and contraction stress test, ultrasound biometry and amniotic fluid assessment, Doppler blood flow studies of fetal and uteroplacental circulation, and an evaluation of biophysical fetal parameters. The combination of these methods leads to improvements in fetal morbidity and mortality.
The present study aimed to assess the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of umbilical artery (UA) systolic/diastolic (S/D) ratio, and amniotic fluid index (AFI) in term pregnancies for the prediction of perinatal outcome and their relation with perinatal outcome.
This study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital on 100 pregnant women where all the term singleton pregnancies (37-42 weeks) admitted in maternity were subjected to color Doppler for UA S/D ratio assessment and AFI estimation. Further, management of patients was done according to color Doppler findings and their relation with perinatal outcome.
Out of 100 pregnant women, 68% had AFI >8 (normal), while 32% of women had AFI <8 (abnormal), with the mean AFI being 9.39 ± 2.55 cm, whereas70% had S/D ratio <3 (normal) and 30% of women had S/D ratio >3 (abnormal), with the mean S/D ratio of 2.61 ± 0.450. UA S/D ratio had better performance values (i.e., sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value) than AFI in predicting adverse perinatal outcomes.
AFI and UA S/D ratio are important for predicting low appearance, pulse, grimace, activity, and respiration score, meconium, respiratory complications, and perinatal mortality in high as well as low-risk pregnancy cases. However, UA S/D ratio is a better predictor of perinatal outcome in high-risk pregnancies.
产前胎儿监护在现代产科学中愈发重要。它基于使用无应激试验和宫缩应激试验进行的胎儿心率监测、超声生物测量和羊水评估、胎儿及子宫胎盘循环的多普勒血流研究以及胎儿生物物理参数评估。这些方法的结合可降低胎儿发病率和死亡率。
本研究旨在评估足月妊娠时脐动脉(UA)收缩压/舒张压(S/D)比值和羊水指数(AFI)对围产期结局预测的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值,以及它们与围产期结局的关系。
本研究在一家三级护理医院对100名孕妇进行,所有入住产科的足月单胎妊娠(37 - 42周)孕妇均接受彩色多普勒检查以评估UA S/D比值和AFI。此外,根据彩色多普勒检查结果及其与围产期结局的关系对患者进行管理。
100名孕妇中,68%的孕妇AFI >8(正常),32%的孕妇AFI <8(异常),平均AFI为9.39±2.55 cm;70%的孕妇S/D比值<3(正常),30%的孕妇S/D比值>3(异常),平均S/D比值为2.61±0.450。在预测不良围产期结局方面,UA S/D比值的性能值(即敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值)优于AFI。
AFI和UA S/D比值对于预测高危和低危妊娠病例中的低阿氏评分、胎粪、呼吸并发症及围产期死亡率很重要。然而,在高危妊娠中,UA S/D比值是更好的围产期结局预测指标。