Suppr超能文献

使用锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)对上颌牙弓尺寸进行形态测量分析。

Morphometric analysis of maxillary arch dimensions using Cone Beam Computer Tomography (CBCT).

作者信息

Jayasinghe R M, Thilakumara I P, Hettiarachchi P V K S, Fonseka M C N, Nanayakkara C D, Jayasinghe R D

机构信息

Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Sciences, University of Peradeniya, Sri Lanka.

Department of Oral Medicine and Periodontology, Faculty of Dental Sciences, University of Peradeniya, Sri Lanka.

出版信息

J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2022 Sep-Oct;12(5):500-504. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2022.06.001. Epub 2022 Jun 15.

Abstract

Knowledge of morphology of the maxillary arch is important in many spacialities of dentistry. This retrospective cross-sectional study was performed using 109 randomly selected maxillary CBCT images of patients in the age range of 18-60 from the archives in Faculty of Dental Sciences, University of Peradeniya, Sri Lanka. EzDent software was used for measurements. Measurements related to the width were acquired from coronal sections while the measurements related to antero-posterior dimensions were performed on axial sections. A majority had an oval shaped maxillary arch (64.8%) followed by V shaped one.(29.2%). The mean height of the alveolar ridge at the upper canine position was 8.9 mm and the mean height of the alveolar ridge at the first molar level was 20.1 mm. Mann Whitney test was used to compare measurements of variables between males and females. Difference in the height of alveolar ridge at the junction of soft and hard palate, width of the alveolar ridge at the canine, first molar and second molar and also the antero-posterior distance of the arch at the inter canine distance and junction between the hard and soft palate were statistically significant. Kruskal Wallis test was used to compare the differences between age groups. Chisquare values didnot indicate significant differences of measurements according to the age group of the participants. In conclusion, there is a significant difference in all maxillary arch parameters between the different genders. No significant differences in arch parameters were observed among the different age groups.

摘要

上颌牙弓形态学知识在牙科学的许多领域都很重要。本回顾性横断面研究使用了从斯里兰卡佩拉德尼亚大学牙科学院档案中随机选取的109例年龄在18 - 60岁患者的上颌CBCT图像。使用EzDent软件进行测量。与宽度相关的测量从冠状面获取,而与前后径相关的测量在轴位面上进行。大多数人的上颌牙弓呈椭圆形(64.8%),其次是V形(29.2%)。上颌尖牙位置牙槽嵴的平均高度为8.9毫米,第一磨牙水平牙槽嵴的平均高度为20.1毫米。使用曼 - 惠特尼检验比较男性和女性之间变量的测量值。软硬腭交界处牙槽嵴高度、尖牙、第一磨牙和第二磨牙处牙槽嵴宽度以及牙弓在尖牙间距离和软硬腭交界处的前后距离差异具有统计学意义。使用克鲁斯卡尔 - 沃利斯检验比较年龄组之间的差异。卡方值未显示根据参与者年龄组的测量值有显著差异。总之,不同性别之间所有上颌牙弓参数存在显著差异。不同年龄组之间未观察到牙弓参数的显著差异。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

1
Dental Arch Dimensions in Saudi Adults.沙特成年人的牙弓尺寸
Int J Dent. 2018 Feb 15;2018:2190250. doi: 10.1155/2018/2190250. eCollection 2018.
3
Morphometric Analysis of Odontometric Parameters for Gender Determination.用于性别判定的牙测量参数的形态测量分析
J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Aug;11(8):ZC09-ZC13. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/26680.10341. Epub 2017 Aug 1.
6
Determinant factors of Yemeni maxillary arch dimensions.也门上颌牙弓尺寸的决定因素。
Saudi Dent J. 2015 Jan;27(1):50-4. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2014.08.005. Epub 2014 Oct 22.
9
Method to classify dental arch forms.牙弓形态分类方法。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Jul;140(1):87-96. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.03.016.
10
Comparison of arch forms between Egyptian and North American white populations.埃及人和北美白人群体的拱形态比较。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Mar;139(3):e245-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.11.012.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验