Suppr超能文献

低梯度主动脉瓣狭窄;诊断难题

Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis; the Diagnostic Dilemma.

作者信息

Alkhalaila Osama, Shehadat Mansour Al

机构信息

Department of Adult Cardiology, Heart Hospital, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.

Department of Non-Invasive Cardiology, Heart Hospital, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.

出版信息

Heart Views. 2022 Jan-Mar;23(1):39-46. doi: 10.4103/heartviews.heartviews_33_22. Epub 2022 May 16.

Abstract

Low-gradient (LG) aortic valve stenosis (AS) constitutes a significant subset among patients with severe aortic stenosis. This entity represents one of the most challenging heart conditions when it comes to diagnosis and management, mainly because of the discrepancy between the small aortic valve area (≤1.0 cm) that is considered a severe AS, and low mean transvalvular pressure gradient (<40 mmHg), which is one of the criteria for nonsevere AS. LG AS is divided according to transvalvular aortic flow rate into normal-flow LG AS and low-flow LG (LFLG) AS; the latter category can be divided further according to left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) into classical LFLG AS if LVEF is depressed or paradoxical LFLG AS if LVEF is preserved. The primary diagnostic challenge in patients with LG AS is to confirm that AS is truly severe and not pseudosevere, which is assessed mainly by either dobutamine stress echocardiography or multidetector computed tomography. The management of symptomatic true severe LG AS is mainly by aortic valve replacement (AVR), whether surgical or transcatheter approach. Patients with LG severe AS have a generally worse prognosis and higher mortality compared with patients with high-gradient severe AS. Despite the survival benefit of AVR in patients with true severe LG AS, these patients have higher surgical risk post-AVR compared with high-gradient AS patients. Early recognition and correct diagnosis of a patient with LG AS is crucial to improve their mortality and morbidity.

摘要

低梯度(LG)主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)在重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者中占相当大的比例。在诊断和管理方面,这种情况是最具挑战性的心脏疾病之一,主要是因为被认为是重度AS的小主动脉瓣面积(≤1.0平方厘米)与非重度AS标准之一的低平均跨瓣压差(<40 mmHg)之间存在差异。LG AS根据跨瓣主动脉流速分为正常流速LG AS和低流速LG(LFLG)AS;后一类可根据左心室射血分数(LVEF)进一步分为LVEF降低时的经典LFLG AS或LVEF保留时的矛盾性LFLG AS。LG AS患者的主要诊断挑战是确认AS是真正的重度而非假性重度,这主要通过多巴酚丁胺负荷超声心动图或多排螺旋计算机断层扫描进行评估。有症状的真正重度LG AS的治疗主要是通过主动脉瓣置换术(AVR),无论是手术还是经导管途径。与高梯度重度AS患者相比,LG重度AS患者的总体预后通常更差,死亡率更高。尽管AVR对真正重度LG AS患者有生存益处,但与高梯度AS患者相比,这些患者AVR后的手术风险更高。早期识别和正确诊断LG AS患者对于改善其死亡率和发病率至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8f1/9231542/4d700a888631/HV-23-39-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验