Dreisoerner Aljoscha, Junker Nina M, Schlotz Wolff, Heimrich Julia, Bloemeke Svenja, Ditzen Beate, van Dick Rolf
Institute of Psychology, Goethe University, Germany.
Labs & Methods, Max-Planck-Institute for Empirical Aestetics, Germany.
Compr Psychoneuroendocrinol. 2021 Oct 8;8:100091. doi: 10.1016/j.cpnec.2021.100091. eCollection 2021 Nov.
Being touched by others improves stress coping. However, when touch from others is unavailable, feels uncomfortable, or is not considered to be safe (as in the COVID-19 pandemic), self-touch gestures, like placing a hand on the heart, may provide an alternative way to experience less strain.
In this study, 159 healthy participants (96 women, 62 men, and 1 non-binary person), aged 18-35 years, were exposed to a standardized psychosocial stressor (Trier Social Stress Test) to investigate whether self-soothing touch or receiving a hug from others has a buffering effect on their stress responses. In addition, the study explored whether the effectiveness of these interventions is moderated by participants' assignment to a "personal" or "social" identity condition. Participants provided salivary cortisol samples, wore an ECG to record their heart rate, and completed self-report measures on stress-related subjective-emotional states during the study.
For cortisol, mixed-effects regression models with Touch and Identity as between-subject factors and Time as the within-subject factor yielded a significant main effect for touch and a significant interaction of Touch x Time indicating that cortisol levels differed between the experimental touch interventions. Post-hoc contrast tests showed that participants in both touch conditions had lower cortisol levels after the stressor than those in the control conditions. Heart rates and self-reported measures of stress neither differed across touch nor identity conditions. The three-way interaction for Touch x Identity x Time was non-significant for either outcome measure.
These results are in line with previous work indicating that physical touch has protective effects on physiological stress responses but not necessarily on self-reported stress and suggest that self-soothing touch and receiving hugs are simple and yet potentially powerful means for buffering individuals' resilience against stress.
被他人触摸有助于应对压力。然而,当无法获得他人的触摸、感觉不舒服或认为不安全时(如在新冠疫情期间),自我触摸手势,如将手放在心脏上,可能提供一种减轻压力的替代方式。
在本研究中,159名年龄在18至35岁之间的健康参与者(96名女性、62名男性和1名非二元性别人士)接受了标准化的心理社会应激源(特里尔社会应激测试),以调查自我安抚性触摸或接受他人拥抱是否对其应激反应具有缓冲作用。此外,该研究还探讨了这些干预措施的有效性是否会因参与者被分配到“个人”或“社会”身份条件而受到调节。参与者在研究期间提供唾液皮质醇样本,佩戴心电图仪记录心率,并完成与压力相关的主观情绪状态的自我报告测量。
对于皮质醇,以触摸和身份作为组间因素、时间作为组内因素的混合效应回归模型产生了显著的触摸主效应和触摸×时间的显著交互作用,表明实验性触摸干预之间的皮质醇水平存在差异。事后对比测试表明,两种触摸条件下的参与者在应激源后皮质醇水平均低于对照条件下的参与者。心率和自我报告的压力测量在触摸和身份条件之间均无差异。触摸×身份×时间的三向交互作用对于任何一种结果测量均不显著。
这些结果与之前的研究一致,表明身体触摸对生理应激反应具有保护作用,但不一定对自我报告的压力有保护作用,并表明自我安抚性触摸和接受拥抱是缓冲个体抗压能力的简单而潜在有效的手段。