McMaster Immunology Research Centre, M. G. DeGroote Institute for Infectious Disease Research, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Front Immunol. 2022 Jun 10;13:860399. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.860399. eCollection 2022.
Infectious diseases of the respiratory tract are one of the top causes of global morbidity and mortality with lower respiratory tract infections being the fourth leading cause of death. The respiratory mucosal (RM) route of vaccine delivery represents a promising strategy against respiratory infections. Although both intranasal and inhaled aerosol methods have been established for human application, there is a considerable knowledge gap in the relationship of vaccine biodistribution to immune efficacy in the lung. Here, by using a murine model and an adenovirus-vectored model vaccine, we have compared the intranasal and endotracheal delivery methods in their biodistribution, immunogenicity and protective efficacy. We find that compared to intranasal delivery, the deepened and widened biodistribution in the lung following endotracheal delivery is associated with much improved vaccine-mediated immunogenicity and protection against the target pathogen. Our findings thus support further development of inhaled aerosol delivery of vaccines over intranasal delivery for human application.
呼吸道传染病是全球发病率和死亡率的主要原因之一,下呼吸道感染是第四大死亡原因。呼吸道黏膜(RM)疫苗接种途径是一种有前途的对抗呼吸道感染的策略。尽管鼻内和吸入气溶胶方法已经被确立用于人类应用,但疫苗生物分布与肺部免疫效果之间的关系仍存在相当大的知识差距。在这里,我们使用一种腺病毒载体疫苗的小鼠模型比较了鼻内和气管内给药方法在其生物分布、免疫原性和保护效果方面的差异。我们发现,与鼻内给药相比,气管内给药后肺部的生物分布加深和拓宽与疫苗介导的免疫原性和针对靶病原体的保护作用明显改善有关。因此,我们的研究结果支持在人类应用中进一步开发吸入气溶胶疫苗输送,而不是鼻内输送。