• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[颈总动脉高位分叉患者行颈动脉内膜切除术和颈动脉支架置入术的长期结果:一项多中心研究]

[Long-term results of carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting in patients with high bifurcation of common carotid artery: a multiple-center study].

作者信息

Belov Yu V, Kazantsev A N, Vinogradov R A, Korotkikh A V, Chernykh K P, Matusevich V V, Kachesov E Yu, Shmatov D V, Zakeryaev A B, Erofeev A A, Dzhanelidze M O, Karmokov I A, Kuklev A P, Andreeva A I, Taits B M, Taits D B, Bagdavadze G Sh, Kokaya R V, Zharova A S, Radzhabov I M, Lutsenko V A, Sultanov R V, Alizada F R, Abdullaev A D, Povtoreyko A V, Kapran T I, Lider R Yu, Vayman E F, Meleshin E O, Ginzburg E R, Makoeva M M, Klimova A I, Vinogradova E R, Zakharova K L, Pachkoriya M G, Alekseeva E O

机构信息

Petrovsky Russian Scientific Center of Surgery, Moscow, Russia.

City Aleksandrovskaya Hospital, St. Petersburg, Russia.

出版信息

Zh Vopr Neirokhir Im N N Burdenko. 2022;86(3):6-16. doi: 10.17116/neiro2022860316.

DOI:10.17116/neiro2022860316
PMID:35758073
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To analyze in-hospital and long-term results of eversion carotid endarterectomy (CEE), carotid endarterectomy with patch repair and carotid artery stenting (CAS) in patients with high bifurcation of common carotid artery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective multiple-center open study included 1983 patients who underwent internal carotid artery (ICA) repair for severe stenosis between 2010 and 2021. Three groups of patients were distinguished depending on revascularization option: group 1 (=638) - eversion CEE; group 2 (=351) - CEE with patch repair; group 3 (=994) - CAS.

RESULTS

In-hospital postoperative mortality and incidence of stroke and myocardial infarction were similar. All bleedings (=39) occurred after CEE. ICA thrombosis was diagnosed in groups 1 and 2 due to intimal detachment after insertion of temporary bypass tube. Incidence of laryngeal paresis, neuropathy of hypoglossal and glossopharyngeal nerves, Horner syndrome, damage to salivary glands was comparable in groups 1 and 2. Long-term mortality was the highest (=10; 2.8%) after CEE with patch repair due to fatal stroke. In turn, the highest incidence of ICA restenosis and restenosis-induced ischemic stroke was observed after CEE with patch repair and CAS.

CONCLUSION

  1. Classical and eversion CEE in patients with high CCA bifurcation is followed by high in-hospital incidence of damage to cranial nerves and salivary glands, laryngeal paresis, Horner syndrome, bleeding and risk of ICA thrombosis. 2. In patients with high CCA bifurcation, CAS and CEE with patch repair are accompanied by high incidence of ICA restenosis, restenosis-induced stroke and mortality in long-term postoperative period. 3. Eversion CEE demonstrates the lowest rates of all adverse cardiovascular events in long-term follow-up period.
摘要

目的

分析外翻式颈动脉内膜切除术(CEE)、带补片修复的颈动脉内膜切除术及颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)治疗颈总动脉高位分叉患者的院内及长期疗效。

材料与方法

一项回顾性多中心开放性研究纳入了1983例在2010年至2021年间因严重狭窄接受颈内动脉(ICA)修复的患者。根据血运重建方式将患者分为三组:第1组(=638例)——外翻式CEE;第2组(=351例)——带补片修复的CEE;第3组(=994例)——CAS。

结果

术后院内死亡率、卒中及心肌梗死发生率相似。所有出血事件(=39例)均发生在CEE术后。第1组和第2组因插入临时搭桥管后内膜剥离而诊断为ICA血栓形成。第1组和第2组喉麻痹、舌下神经和舌咽神经病变、霍纳综合征、唾液腺损伤的发生率相当。带补片修复的CEE术后长期死亡率最高(=10例;2.8%),原因是致命性卒中。反过来,带补片修复的CEE和CAS术后观察到ICA再狭窄及再狭窄所致缺血性卒中的发生率最高。

结论

  1. 颈总动脉高位分叉患者行经典式和外翻式CEE术后,院内颅神经和唾液腺损伤、喉麻痹、霍纳综合征、出血及ICA血栓形成风险较高。2. 颈总动脉高位分叉患者行CAS和带补片修复的CEE术后,长期随访期内ICA再狭窄、再狭窄所致卒中和死亡率较高。3. 外翻式CEE在长期随访期内所有不良心血管事件发生率最低。

相似文献

1
[Long-term results of carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting in patients with high bifurcation of common carotid artery: a multiple-center study].[颈总动脉高位分叉患者行颈动脉内膜切除术和颈动脉支架置入术的长期结果:一项多中心研究]
Zh Vopr Neirokhir Im N N Burdenko. 2022;86(3):6-16. doi: 10.17116/neiro2022860316.
2
[Transposition of internal carotid artery over hypoglossal nerve in eversion carotid endarterectomy].[外翻式颈动脉内膜切除术中外侧颈总动脉经舌下神经移位术]
Khirurgiia (Mosk). 2021(6):63-71. doi: 10.17116/hirurgia202106163.
3
Hybrid treatment of tandem, common carotid/innominate artery and ipsilateral carotid bifurcation stenoses by simultaneous, retrograde proximal stenting and eversion carotid endarterectomy: Preliminary results of a case series.同期逆行近端支架置入术联合外翻颈动脉内膜切除术治疗串联、颈总/无名动脉及同侧颈动脉分叉狭窄的杂交治疗:病例系列的初步结果。
Int J Surg. 2018 Apr;52:329-333. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.02.062. Epub 2018 Mar 10.
4
A Multicentric Study of Different Methods of Open Surgical Cerebral Revascularization for Internal Carotid Artery Orifice Stenosis.一项关于颈内动脉开口狭窄开放式手术脑血管重建不同方法的多中心研究。
Curr Probl Cardiol. 2024 Jan;49(1 Pt B):102082. doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2023.102082. Epub 2023 Sep 13.
5
Effects of different types of carotid endarterectomy on the course of resistant arterial hypertension.不同类型颈动脉内膜切除术对耐药性动脉高血压病程的影响。
Vascular. 2024 Apr;32(2):458-466. doi: 10.1177/17085381221140620. Epub 2022 Nov 21.
6
Hospital and long-term results of carotid endarterectomy in patients with different severity of coronary artery lesion according to syntax score.根据Syntax 评分,不同严重程度冠状动脉病变患者颈动脉内膜切除术的医院和长期结果。
Curr Probl Cardiol. 2024 Feb;49(2):102244. doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2023.102244. Epub 2023 Dec 1.
7
[Surgical policy of managing patients with concomitant atherosclerotic lesions of the internal and common carotid arteries].[伴有颈内动脉和颈总动脉粥样硬化病变患者的外科治疗策略]
Angiol Sosud Khir. 2019;25(4):124-130. doi: 10.33529/ANGIO2019404.
8
Immediate and remote results of using carotid endarterectomy and stenting of internal carotid arteries.颈动脉内膜切除术和颈内动脉支架置入术的近期和远期效果。
Angiol Sosud Khir. 2013;19(2):102-10, 93-100.
9
[A multicenter study on the influence of different kinds of carotidal endarterectomy on the course of resistant arterial hypertension].[一项关于不同类型颈动脉内膜切除术对顽固性动脉高血压病程影响的多中心研究]
Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova. 2021;121(9):19-30. doi: 10.17116/jnevro202112109119.
10
Carotid angioplasty and stenting is safe and effective for treatment of recurrent stenosis after eversion endarterectomy.颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术对于外翻式内膜切除术术后复发性狭窄的治疗是安全有效的。
J Vasc Surg. 2014 Sep;60(3):645-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.03.288. Epub 2014 May 1.