Human Evolution Foundation, East Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
Centre de Recherche en Paléontologie-Paris (CR2P) UMR 7207-CNRS, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Sorbonne Université Département Origines et Évolution, Paris, France.
Evol Anthropol. 2022 Sep;31(5):237-239. doi: 10.1002/evan.21952. Epub 2022 Jun 27.
In an Evolutionary Anthropology article Roksandic et al. (2022) propose a new middle Pleistocene hominin species H. bodoensis to replace a "poorly defined" Homo heidelbergenis. Homo bodoensis extends from the African Middle Pleistocene through the Levant to South-eastern Europe with all currently classified H. heidelbergensis fossils from western Europe subsumed into Homo neandertalensis. The authors claim their new species will be more clearly defined than H. heidelbergensis and will better describe hominin variation and evolution in the middle Pleistocene. Roksandic et al. are unable to account for some European fossils (i.e., Petralona and Arago) and provide no evidence as to how their new species meets their objectives. Fatally, they overlook the priority rule and fail to realize that H. bodoensis is both a junior synonym of Homo rhodesiensis and Homo saldanensis. Roksandic et al. conflate taxonomy with phylogeny, present hypotheses as facts, and harbor many systematic and evolutionary misconceptions.
在《进化人类学》的一篇文章中,罗桑迪克等人(2022 年)提出了一个新的中更新世原始人物种 H. bodoensis,以取代“定义不明确”的 Homo heidelbergenis。 Homo bodoensis 从非洲中更新世延伸到黎凡特地区,再延伸到东南欧,所有目前被归类为 H. heidelbergensis 的化石都归入 Homo neandertalensis。作者声称,他们的新物种将比 Homo heidelbergensis 定义得更明确,并能更好地描述中更新世人类的变异和进化。罗桑迪克等人无法解释一些欧洲化石(即 Petralona 和 Arago),也没有提供任何证据表明他们的新物种如何符合他们的目标。致命的是,他们忽略了优先规则,没有意识到 H. bodoensis 既是 Homo rhodesiensis 和 Homo saldanensis 的次同名。罗桑迪克等人将分类学与系统发生学混为一谈,将假说作为事实呈现,并存在许多系统和进化上的误解。