• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较位于第 7 段和第 8 段的肿瘤的腹腔镜局限性肝切除术的难度:一项国际多中心倾向评分匹配研究。

Comparison between the difficulty of laparoscopic limited liver resections of tumors located in segment 7 versus segment 8: An international multicenter propensity-score matched study.

机构信息

Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow, Russia.

Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore City, Singapore.

出版信息

J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2023 Feb;30(2):177-191. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.1210. Epub 2022 Jul 20.

DOI:10.1002/jhbp.1210
PMID:35758911
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Presently, according to different difficulty scoring systems, there is no difference in complexity estimation of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) of segments 7 and 8. However, there is no published data supporting this assumption. To date, no studies have compared the outcomes of laparoscopic parenchyma-sparing resection of the liver segments 7 and 8.

METHODS

A post hoc analysis of patients undergoing LLR of segments 7 and 8 in 46 centers between 2004 and 2020 was performed. 1:1 Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to compare isolated LLR of segments 7 and 8. Subset analyses were also performed to compare atypical resections and segmentectomies of 7 and 8.

RESULTS

A total of 2411 patients were identified, and 1691 patients met the inclusion criteria. Comparison after PSM between the entire cohort of segment 7 and segment 8 resections revealed inferior results for segment 7 resection in terms of increased blood loss, blood transfusions, and conversions to open surgery. Subset analyses of only atypical resections similarly demonstrated poorer outcomes for segment 7 in terms of increased blood loss, operation time, blood transfusions, and conversions to open surgery. Conversely, a subgroup analysis of segmentectomies after PSM found better outcomes for segment 7 in terms of a shorter operation time and hospital stay.

CONCLUSION

Differences in the outcomes of segments 7 and 8 resections suggest a greater difficulty of laparoscopic atypical resection of segment 7 compared to segment 8, and greater difficulty of segmentectomy 8 compared to segmentectomy 7.

摘要

背景

目前,根据不同的难度评分系统,对肝段 7 和 8 的腹腔镜肝切除(LLR)的复杂性估计没有差异。然而,没有发表的数据支持这一假设。迄今为止,没有研究比较过腹腔镜保留肝实质的肝段 7 和 8 的切除术。

方法

对 2004 年至 2020 年期间 46 个中心行 LLR 肝段 7 和 8 的患者进行了一项回顾性分析。使用 1:1 倾向评分匹配(PSM)来比较孤立性肝段 7 和 8 的 LLR。还进行了亚组分析,以比较肝段 7 和 8 的非典型切除术和节段切除术。

结果

共确定了 2411 例患者,其中 1691 例符合纳入标准。在整个肝段 7 和 8 切除组进行 PSM 比较后,肝段 7 切除的出血量、输血量和转为开腹手术的比例增加,结果较差。仅对非典型切除术的亚组分析也表明,肝段 7 的出血量、手术时间、输血量和转为开腹手术的比例增加,结果较差。相反,PSM 后节段切除术的亚组分析发现,肝段 7 的手术时间和住院时间更短,结果更好。

结论

肝段 7 和 8 切除术结果的差异表明,与肝段 8 的非典型切除术相比,肝段 7 的腹腔镜非典型切除术难度更大,与肝段 7 的节段切除术相比,肝段 8 的节段切除术难度更大。

相似文献

1
Comparison between the difficulty of laparoscopic limited liver resections of tumors located in segment 7 versus segment 8: An international multicenter propensity-score matched study.比较位于第 7 段和第 8 段的肿瘤的腹腔镜局限性肝切除术的难度:一项国际多中心倾向评分匹配研究。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2023 Feb;30(2):177-191. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.1210. Epub 2022 Jul 20.
2
Expanding indications for laparoscopic parenchyma-sparing resection of posterosuperior liver segments in patients with colorectal metastases: comparison with open hepatectomy for immediate and long-term outcomes.扩大腹腔镜保留实质肝切除术治疗结直肠癌肝转移患者后上肝段的适应证:与开腹肝切除术的近期和长期疗效比较
Surg Endosc. 2021 Jan;35(1):96-103. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07363-z. Epub 2020 Jan 13.
3
Limited liver resections in the posterosuperior segments: international multicentre propensity score-matched and coarsened exact-matched analysis comparing the laparoscopic and robotic approaches.后上肝段的有限肝切除术:腹腔镜与机器人手术的国际多中心倾向评分匹配和粗糙精确匹配分析比较。
Br J Surg. 2022 Oct 14;109(11):1140-1149. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znac270.
4
Propensity score-matched analysis of laparoscopic-assisted and hand-assisted laparoscopic liver resection versus pure laparoscopic liver resection: an international multicenter study.倾向评分匹配分析腹腔镜辅助与手助腹腔镜肝切除术与纯腹腔镜肝切除术的比较:一项国际多中心研究。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Jul;37(7):5482-5493. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10028-7. Epub 2023 Apr 12.
5
Propensity Score-Matching Analysis Comparing Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Limited Liver Resections of the Posterosuperior Segments: An International Multicenter Study.倾向评分匹配分析比较后上段有限肝切除术的机器人手术与腹腔镜手术:一项国际多中心研究。
Ann Surg. 2024 Feb 1;279(2):297-305. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006027. Epub 2023 Jul 24.
6
An international multicenter propensity-score matched and coarsened-exact matched analysis comparing robotic versus laparoscopic partial liver resections of the anterolateral segments.国际多中心倾向评分匹配和粗糙精确匹配分析比较机器人与腹腔镜前外侧肝段部分切除术。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2022 Aug;29(8):843-854. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.1149. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
7
Laparoscopic versus open parenchymal preserving liver resections in the posterosuperior segments: a case-matched study.腹腔镜与开腹保肝实质肝切除术在后上叶段:病例匹配研究。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Mar;32(3):1478-1485. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5835-z. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
8
Robotic versus laparoscopic resections of posterosuperior segments of the liver: a propensity score-matched comparison.机器人手术与腹腔镜手术治疗肝后上段切除术:倾向评分匹配比较
Surg Endosc. 2016 Mar;30(3):1004-13. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4284-9. Epub 2015 Jun 27.
9
Robotic versus laparoscopic liver resection in posterosuperior region: a retrospective study of consecutive cases.机器人与腹腔镜肝后上区切除术:连续病例的回顾性研究。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Jun;37(6):4728-4736. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-09952-5. Epub 2023 Mar 8.
10
Laparoscopic versus open limited liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma with liver cirrhosis: a propensity score matching study with the Hiroshima Surgical study group of Clinical Oncology (HiSCO).腹腔镜与开腹局限性肝切除术治疗肝硬化肝细胞癌的比较:来自广岛临床肿瘤外科学会(HiSCO)的倾向评分匹配研究。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Nov;34(11):5055-5061. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07302-y. Epub 2019 Dec 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Liver resection in stage 0-A HCC in segments 7/8: a propensity-matched analysis comparing open, laparoscopic, and robotic approach.7/8段0-A期肝癌的肝切除术:一项比较开放、腹腔镜和机器人手术入路的倾向匹配分析
Surg Endosc. 2025 Mar;39(3):1902-1914. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11521-3. Epub 2025 Jan 23.
2
Explainable artificial intelligence prediction-based model in laparoscopic liver surgery for segments 7 and 8: an international multicenter study.基于可解释人工智能预测的腹腔镜肝 7、8 段切除术模型:一项国际多中心研究。
Surg Endosc. 2024 May;38(5):2411-2422. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10681-6. Epub 2024 Feb 5.
3
A safe and simple exposure and Pringle maneuver in laparoscopic anatomical liver resection of segment 7.
腹腔镜解剖性肝 7 段切除术中安全简单的显露与 Pringle 手法。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2023 Nov 29;23(1):418. doi: 10.1186/s12876-023-03056-z.
4
ASO Author Reflections: Laparoscopic Anatomical Segment 8 Resection Using Digital Intelligent Liver Surgery Technologies: The Combination of Multiple Navigation Approaches.ASO作者反思:使用数字智能肝脏手术技术进行腹腔镜解剖性肝段8切除术:多种导航方法的结合
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Nov;30(12):7388-7390. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-14214-8. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
5
Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in segment 8: a propensity score-matched two-center study.腹腔镜肝切除术治疗肝右前叶肝细胞癌的疗效与安全性:一项倾向评分匹配的双中心研究
Surg Endosc. 2023 Nov;37(11):8438-8446. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10291-8. Epub 2023 Jul 18.