Christine Cleary Kimpel, MA, BSN, RN, is PhD Candidate, Vanderbilt University School of Nursing, Nashville, Tennessee.
Kemberlee Bonnet, MA, is Research Coordinator, Vanderbilt University (Psychology), Nashville, Tennessee.
Gastroenterol Nurs. 2022;45(4):244-253. doi: 10.1097/SGA.0000000000000654. Epub 2022 Jun 25.
As many as 35% of patients may experience an inadequate-quality bowel preparation for colonoscopy, which may then require a repeated colonoscopy without insurance coverage. To our knowledge, there have been no qualitative studies with an in-depth exploration of patient experiences of this outcome. This study aimed to explore patients' perceptions of experiencing an inadequate preparation compared to those with only an adequate-quality bowel preparation history. Quantitative analyses were conducted for three one-item questions (e.g., anxiety rating) with ordinal scales. Qualitative data were collected from audio-recorded and transcribed telephone interviews ( N = 20) and anonymous online surveys ( N = 59). An inductive/deductive coding system was constructed, and themes were generated to form a conceptual framework. Brief quantitative results are provided. Themes of the colonoscopy process include context, prepreparation, implementation, outcomes, response, and decision to repeat. This novel study underscored the emotional experience of patients with inadequate preparation and subsequent influence on decisions to repeat the procedure. Recommendations are given for research, policy, and practice.
多达 35%的患者可能在结肠镜检查前的肠道准备不充分,这可能需要在没有保险覆盖的情况下再次进行结肠镜检查。据我们所知,还没有对患者经历这种结果的深入探索的定性研究。本研究旨在探讨与仅有充分肠道准备史的患者相比,患者对肠道准备不充分的看法。对三个包含定序量表的单项问题(例如焦虑评分)进行了定量分析。从电话访谈(n=20)和匿名在线调查(n=59)中收集了定性数据,并进行了转录。构建了一个归纳/演绎编码系统,并生成了主题以形成一个概念框架。简要提供了定量结果。结肠镜检查过程的主题包括背景、准备前、实施、结果、反应和重复决定。这项新颖的研究强调了肠道准备不充分的患者的情绪体验,以及对重复该程序的决策的后续影响。为研究、政策和实践提供了建议。