• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

佩戴N95口罩对院前急救人员胸外按压质量的影响:一项交叉研究。

Effect of Wearing N95 Mask on the Quality of Chest Compressions in Prehospital Emergency Personnel: A Cross-over Study.

作者信息

Chen Liang, Shen Yang, Liu Shuangmei, Cao Yanyan, Zhu Zhe

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China.

出版信息

Prehosp Emerg Care. 2023;27(6):713-717. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2022.2095066. Epub 2022 Jul 14.

DOI:10.1080/10903127.2022.2095066
PMID:35759255
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of wearing an N95 mask on the quality of chest compression and fatigue of prehospital emergency personnel during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR).

METHODS

Twenty-four eligible participants were recruited. Participants' age, sex, height, and weight were recorded. After completing the CPR training and examination, participants were tested twice, wearing surgical mask or an N95 mask, while performing chest compressions for 2 minutes. The quality of chest compression (including compression frequency, depth, rebound, and position) was recorded by the simulator. Borg fatigue scores and physiological parameters (including heart rate, mean arterial pressure, pulse oxygen saturation, and respiratory rate) were recorded before and after chest compressions.

RESULTS

Compared to wearing surgical masks, participants wearing N95 masks had significantly lower quality of chest compression, including compression frequency (98.3 ± 4.9 bpm vs 104.0 ± 6.0 bpm, P < 0.001), depth (47.1 ± 4.5 mm vs 50.5 ± 5.4 mm, P < 0.001), and rebound (90.2 ± 2.7% vs 94.3 ± 2.1%, P < 0.001). The compression position was not affected. The period data showed that the difference in compression quality started after 1 minute of compressions. Participants wearing N95 masks had higher Borg fatigue scores [6.1(2) vs 5.1(2), P < 0.001], heart rates (121.2 ± 5.7 bpm vs 109.9 ± 6.0 bpm, P < 0.001), mean arterial pressures (106.3 ± 8.0 mmHg vs 99.0 ± 8.5 mmHg, P = 0.012), and respiratory rates (29.5 ± 2.7 bpm vs 24.7 ± 2.5 bpm, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This study showed that the use of an N95 mask by prehospital emergency personnel during the performance of chest compressions resulted in a reduction of compression quality and increased clinician fatigue. There is a need for CPR training for medical personnel wearing personal protective equipment.

摘要

目的

评估佩戴N95口罩对院前急救人员在心肺复苏(CPR)过程中胸外按压质量及疲劳程度的影响。

方法

招募24名符合条件的参与者。记录参与者的年龄、性别、身高和体重。在完成CPR培训和考核后,参与者分别佩戴外科口罩或N95口罩进行两次测试,每次进行2分钟的胸外按压。由模拟器记录胸外按压质量(包括按压频率、深度、回弹和位置)。记录胸外按压前后的Borg疲劳评分及生理参数(包括心率、平均动脉压、脉搏血氧饱和度和呼吸频率)。

结果

与佩戴外科口罩相比,佩戴N95口罩的参与者胸外按压质量显著降低,包括按压频率(98.3±4.9次/分钟 vs 104.0±6.0次/分钟,P<0.001)、深度(47.1±4.5毫米 vs 50.5±5.4毫米,P<0.001)和回弹(90.2±2.7% vs 94.3±2.1%,P<0.001)。按压位置未受影响。时段数据显示,按压1分钟后按压质量出现差异。佩戴N95口罩的参与者Borg疲劳评分更高[6.1(2) vs 5.1(2),P<0.001],心率更高(121.2±5.7次/分钟 vs 109.9±6.0次/分钟,P<0.001),平均动脉压更高(106.3±8.0毫米汞柱 vs 99.0±8.5毫米汞柱,P=0.012),呼吸频率更高(29.5±2.7次/分钟 vs 24.7±2.5次/分钟,P<0.001)。

结论

本研究表明,院前急救人员在进行胸外按压时佩戴N95口罩会导致按压质量下降,并增加临床医生的疲劳程度。对佩戴个人防护装备的医务人员进行CPR培训很有必要。

相似文献

1
Effect of Wearing N95 Mask on the Quality of Chest Compressions in Prehospital Emergency Personnel: A Cross-over Study.佩戴N95口罩对院前急救人员胸外按压质量的影响:一项交叉研究。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2023;27(6):713-717. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2022.2095066. Epub 2022 Jul 14.
2
Wearing a N95 mask increases rescuer's fatigue and decreases chest compression quality in simulated cardiopulmonary resuscitation.在模拟心肺复苏中,佩戴N95口罩会增加救援人员的疲劳感并降低胸外按压质量。
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Jun;44:434-438. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.05.065. Epub 2020 May 27.
3
Chest compression quality comparing 1-min vs 2-min rotation of rescuers wearing N95 masks.佩戴 N95 口罩的救援人员 1 分钟与 2 分钟轮换时的胸外按压质量比较。
Am J Emerg Med. 2024 Feb;76:75-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2023.11.025. Epub 2023 Nov 21.
4
Chest compression quality during CPR of potential contagious patients wearing personal protection equipment.在穿戴个人防护装备的潜在传染性患者心肺复苏期间的胸外按压质量。
Am J Emerg Med. 2022 Feb;52:128-131. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.12.009. Epub 2021 Dec 10.
5
How effective are chest compressions when wearing mask? A randomised simulation study among first-year health care students during the COVID-19 pandemic.佩戴口罩时胸外按压的效果如何?COVID-19 大流行期间对一年级医护学生进行的一项随机模拟研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2022 May 8;22(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s12873-022-00636-2.
6
Rescuer fatigue: standard versus continuous chest-compression cardiopulmonary resuscitation.救援者疲劳:标准胸外按压与持续胸外按压心肺复苏术对比
Acad Emerg Med. 2006 Oct;13(10):1020-6. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2006.06.049.
7
Bystander fatigue and CPR quality by older bystanders: a randomized crossover trial comparing continuous chest compressions and 30:2 compressions to ventilations.老年旁观者的旁观者疲劳与心肺复苏质量:一项比较持续胸外按压和30:2按压与通气的随机交叉试验。
CJEM. 2016 Nov;18(6):461-468. doi: 10.1017/cem.2016.373. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
8
A Novel Infant Chest Compression Assist Device Using a Palm Rather Than Fingers: A Randomized Crossover Trial.一种新型婴儿胸部按压辅助装置,使用手掌而不是手指:一项随机交叉试验。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2019 Jan-Feb;23(1):74-82. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2018.1471559. Epub 2018 Aug 17.
9
Decay in quality of closed-chest compressions over time.随着时间推移,胸外按压质量下降。
Ann Emerg Med. 1995 Sep;26(3):300-3. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(95)70076-5.
10
A Simulation Study Using a Quality Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Medical Manikin to Evaluate the Effects of Using Personal Protective Equipment on Performance of Emergency Resuscitation by Medical Students from the University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland and Non-Medical Personnel.一项使用心肺复苏质量模拟人评估波兰西里西亚大学卡托维兹分校医学生和非医务人员使用个人防护设备对急救复苏操作影响的模拟研究。
Med Sci Monit. 2022 Jul 2;28:e936844. doi: 10.12659/MSM.936844.