Suppr超能文献

佩戴 N95 口罩的救援人员 1 分钟与 2 分钟轮换时的胸外按压质量比较。

Chest compression quality comparing 1-min vs 2-min rotation of rescuers wearing N95 masks.

机构信息

Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Dhanvantari Nagar, Puducherry 605006, India.

Department of Anaesthesiology & Critical Care, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Dhanvantari Nagar, Puducherry 605006, India.

出版信息

Am J Emerg Med. 2024 Feb;76:75-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2023.11.025. Epub 2023 Nov 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

During the COVID-19 pandemic, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) performed by rescuers wearing well-sealed respirators such as N95 masks, was associated with significant reduction in the chest compression rate and depth. This was attributed to fatigue during the standard 2-min rescuer rotations. We hypothesized that in such situations, rotating rescuers every one minute, instead of the standard two minutes would improve CPR quality.

AIM

To compare the quality of chest compressions when rescuers wearing N95 masks are rotated every one minute, instead of the standard practice of two-minute rotations.

METHODS

A randomized, controlled, crossover trial was conducted, with the approval of the institutional Ethics Committee. Medical students who volunteered as rescuers were trained to perform high-quality chest compressions on a manikin, and then randomly allocated into pairs. Each pair was randomized to one of two trial groups viz. one-minute rotations crossed-over to two-minute rotations; and vice versa. Thus, each pair performed CPR with one-minute rotations, as well as two-minute rotations Each CPR session included chest compressions for a duration of 12 min. The outcome parameters included CPR quality, compression depth, compression rate, and chest compression fraction. Rescuer fatigue was measured before and after each study session using the modified Borg scale.

RESULTS

Fifty-six participants completed the study. The overall CPR quality was statistically similar in the study arms (median 88% vs. 81%, p = 0.09). However, the minute-to-minute inter-arm comparison revealed significantly lower CPR quality in the 2-min rotation arm, at the end of minutes 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 (respective p-values 0.03, 0.001, 0.008, 0.02, 0.002). A similar trend was observed in compression depth also. Rescuer fatigue score was significantly less with 1-min rotations compared to 2-min rotations (p < 0.001). Rescuer vital signs and cardiorespiratory parameters were not different with the two types of rotations.

CONCLUSION

During CPR performed by rescuers wearing N95 masks, the quality of CPR appears to be superior with rescuers rotating at 1-min instead of 2-min intervals. More frequent rotation was also associated with less rescuer fatigue.

摘要

背景

在 COVID-19 大流行期间,救援人员佩戴密封良好的呼吸器(如 N95 口罩)进行心肺复苏术(CPR),与显著降低胸外按压率和深度有关。这归因于标准 2 分钟救援人员轮换期间的疲劳。我们假设在这种情况下,将救援人员的轮换时间从标准的 2 分钟改为 1 分钟,会提高 CPR 的质量。

目的

比较佩戴 N95 口罩的救援人员每 1 分钟轮换一次与标准的 2 分钟轮换相比,CPR 质量的差异。

方法

一项随机、对照、交叉试验,获得了机构伦理委员会的批准。自愿担任救援人员的医学生接受了在模型上进行高质量胸外按压的培训,然后随机分组配对。每对被随机分配到两个试验组之一,即 1 分钟轮换交叉至 2 分钟轮换;反之亦然。因此,每对都以 1 分钟的轮换进行 CPR,以及 2 分钟的轮换。每次 CPR 持续 12 分钟。观察的结局参数包括 CPR 质量、按压深度、按压频率和胸外按压分数。在每次研究结束后使用改良 Borg 量表测量救援人员的疲劳程度。

结果

56 名参与者完成了研究。研究组之间的整体 CPR 质量统计学上无差异(中位数 88%与 81%,p=0.09)。然而,分钟间的臂间比较显示,在 2 分钟轮换组,在第 4、6、8、10 和 12 分钟时,CPR 质量显著降低(相应的 p 值分别为 0.03、0.001、0.008、0.02 和 0.002)。同样的趋势也表现在按压深度上。与 2 分钟轮换相比,1 分钟轮换时救援人员的疲劳评分明显降低(p<0.001)。两种轮换方式对救援人员的生命体征和心肺参数没有影响。

结论

在佩戴 N95 口罩的救援人员进行的 CPR 中,与 2 分钟轮换相比,救援人员每 1 分钟轮换一次时,CPR 的质量似乎更好。更频繁的轮换也与救援人员的疲劳程度降低有关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验