• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Tools for Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy Decision Making.用于对侧预防性乳房切除术决策的工具。
J Clin Oncol. 2022 Nov 1;40(31):3653-3659. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.02782. Epub 2022 Jun 27.
2
Predicting women's intentions for contralateral prophylactic mastectomy: An application of an extended theory of planned behaviour.预测女性对双侧预防性乳房切除术的意向:计划行为扩展理论的应用
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2016 Apr;21:57-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2015.12.002. Epub 2016 Feb 2.
3
Assessing the Effect of Lifetime Contralateral Breast Cancer Risk on the Selection of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy for Unilateral Breast Cancer.评估终生对侧乳腺癌风险对单侧乳腺癌患者选择对侧预防性乳房切除术的影响。
Clin Breast Cancer. 2018 Apr;18(2):e205-e218. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2017.09.010. Epub 2017 Sep 27.
4
Outcomes of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in relation to familial history: a decision analysis (BRCR-D-16-00033).对侧预防性乳房切除术与家族史相关的结局:一项决策分析(BRCR-D-16-00033)
Breast Cancer Res. 2016 Sep 20;18(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s13058-016-0752-y.
5
EBCC-13 manifesto: Balancing pros and cons for contralateral prophylactic mastectomy.EBCC-13 宣言:权衡利弊,决定是否行对侧预防性乳房切除术。
Eur J Cancer. 2023 Mar;181:79-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.11.036. Epub 2022 Dec 13.
6
Should the use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy be increasing as it is?作为预防性措施,是否应该增加对侧预防性乳房切除术的应用?
Breast. 2009 Oct;18 Suppl 3:S93-5. doi: 10.1016/S0960-9776(09)70282-6.
7
Better contralateral breast cancer risk estimation and alternative options to contralateral prophylactic mastectomy.更好的对侧乳腺癌风险评估和对侧预防性乳房切除术的替代选择。
Int J Womens Health. 2015 Feb 4;7:181-7. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S52380. eCollection 2015.
8
"It felt like unfinished business, it feels like that's finished now": Women's experiences of decision making around contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM).“感觉就像未竟之事,现在感觉已经结束了”:女性在决定是否进行对侧预防性乳房切除术(CPM)时的体验。
Psychooncology. 2019 Jun;28(6):1328-1334. doi: 10.1002/pon.5086. Epub 2019 Apr 24.
9
Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy Decisions in a Population-Based Sample of Patients With Early-Stage Breast Cancer.早期乳腺癌患者基于人群样本的对侧预防性乳房切除术决策
JAMA Surg. 2017 Mar 1;152(3):274-282. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4749.
10
Surgical Decision-Making Surrounding Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy: Comparison of Treatment Goals, Preferences, and Psychosocial Outcomes from a Multicenter Survey of Breast Cancer Patients.围绕着对侧预防性乳房切除术的手术决策:一项对乳腺癌患者进行的多中心调查的治疗目标、偏好和心理社会结果比较。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Dec;28(13):8752-8765. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-10426-y. Epub 2021 Jul 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Trends in utilization of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among different age, racial and ethnic groups.不同年龄、种族和族裔群体对侧预防性乳房切除术的使用趋势。
Gland Surg. 2023 Sep 25;12(9):1224-1232. doi: 10.21037/gs-22-759. Epub 2023 Sep 18.
2
EBCC-13 manifesto: Balancing pros and cons for contralateral prophylactic mastectomy.EBCC-13 宣言:权衡利弊,决定是否行对侧预防性乳房切除术。
Eur J Cancer. 2023 Mar;181:79-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.11.036. Epub 2022 Dec 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Risk-Reducing Mastectomy.降低风险的乳房切除术。
JAMA. 2021 May 4;325(17):1781-1782. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.22414.
2
Risk of contralateral breast cancer according to first breast cancer characteristics among women in the USA, 1992-2016.美国女性 1992-2016 年期间,基于首次乳腺癌特征的对侧乳腺癌风险。
Breast Cancer Res. 2021 Feb 17;23(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s13058-021-01400-3.
3
Contralateral breast cancer risk in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast cancer.导管原位癌和浸润性乳腺癌患者对侧乳腺癌的风险
NPJ Breast Cancer. 2020 Nov 3;6(1):60. doi: 10.1038/s41523-020-00202-8.
4
Prediction and clinical utility of a contralateral breast cancer risk model.预测和临床应用的乳腺癌风险模型。
Breast Cancer Res. 2019 Dec 17;21(1):144. doi: 10.1186/s13058-019-1221-1.
5
The Influence of Adjuvant Systemic Regimens on Contralateral Breast Cancer Risk and Receptor Subtype.辅助全身治疗方案对对侧乳腺癌风险和受体亚型的影响。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019 Jul 1;111(7):709-718. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djz010.
6
Ten-year recurrence rates for breast cancer subtypes in the Netherlands: A large population-based study.荷兰乳腺癌亚型的 10 年复发率:一项大型基于人群的研究。
Int J Cancer. 2019 Jan 15;144(2):263-272. doi: 10.1002/ijc.31914. Epub 2018 Nov 28.
7
Risk-reducing mastectomy for the prevention of primary breast cancer.预防性乳房切除术以预防原发性乳腺癌。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 5;4(4):CD002748. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002748.pub4.
8
Validation of a personalized risk prediction model for contralateral breast cancer.验证用于预测对侧乳腺癌风险的个体化预测模型。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Jul;170(2):415-423. doi: 10.1007/s10549-018-4763-5. Epub 2018 Mar 24.
9
Hormone receptor status of a first primary breast cancer predicts contralateral breast cancer risk in the WECARE study population.在WECARE研究人群中,首次原发性乳腺癌的激素受体状态可预测对侧乳腺癌风险。
Breast Cancer Res. 2017 Jul 19;19(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s13058-017-0874-x.
10
State Variation in the Receipt of a Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy Among Women Who Received a Diagnosis of Invasive Unilateral Early-Stage Breast Cancer in the United States, 2004-2012.美国 2004-2012 年间接受单侧浸润性早期乳腺癌诊断的女性中,接受对侧预防性乳房切除术的情况存在州际差异。
JAMA Surg. 2017 Jul 1;152(7):648-657. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.0115.

用于对侧预防性乳房切除术决策的工具。

Tools for Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy Decision Making.

机构信息

Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD.

Division of Surgical Oncology and Endocrine Surgery, University of Texas Health, San Antonio, TX.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 2022 Nov 1;40(31):3653-3659. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.02782. Epub 2022 Jun 27.

DOI:10.1200/JCO.21.02782
PMID:35759730
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9622574/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Women with unilateral breast cancer are increasingly opting for the removal of not only the involved breast, but also for the removal of the opposite uninvolved breast (contralateral prophylactic mastectomy [CPM]), although the risk of contralateral breast cancer (CBC) has decreased in recent years. Models to predict the absolute risk of CBC can help a woman decide whether to undergo CPM. Our objective is to illustrate that a better decision can be made if the patient and doctor also have estimates of the absolute risks of regional and distant recurrences and mortality from non-breast cancer causes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We based our analyses on two published models for CBC and published information on the hazards of regional and distant recurrences and non-breast cancer mortality. Assuming that CPM eliminates CBC but has no effect on other events, we calculated how much CPM reduces a woman's CBC risk and total risk from all these events for 10 hypothetical women with various subtypes of breast cancer and risk factors.

RESULTS

The risk of CBC and total risk vary greatly, depending on the breast cancer subtype. In some cases, a decision for or against CPM can be based on CBC risk alone, but in others, additional consideration of total risk may cause a woman to decline CPM.

CONCLUSION

There is a potential to develop more informative tools for deciding on CPM. Realizing this potential will require more and better data to validate existing models of absolute CBC risk and to characterize the hazards of regional and distant recurrences and deaths from non-breast cancer causes for women with various subtypes of breast cancers and risk factors.

摘要

目的

患有单侧乳腺癌的女性越来越多地选择不仅切除患病乳房,还切除对侧未患病乳房(预防性对侧乳房切除术 [CPM]),尽管近年来对侧乳腺癌(CBC)的风险已经降低。预测 CBC 绝对风险的模型可以帮助女性决定是否进行 CPM。我们的目的是说明,如果患者和医生还估计了区域和远处复发以及非乳腺癌原因导致的死亡率的绝对风险,那么可以做出更好的决策。

材料和方法

我们的分析基于两个已发表的 CBC 模型和关于区域和远处复发以及非乳腺癌死亡率风险的已发表信息。假设 CPM 消除了 CBC,但对其他事件没有影响,我们计算了 CPM 降低了患有各种乳腺癌亚型和危险因素的 10 位假设女性的 CBC 风险和所有这些事件的总风险。

结果

CBC 风险和总风险差异很大,具体取决于乳腺癌的亚型。在某些情况下,CPM 的决定可以仅基于 CBC 风险做出,但在其他情况下,对总风险的额外考虑可能会导致女性拒绝 CPM。

结论

有可能开发出更具信息量的工具来决定 CPM。要实现这一潜力,需要更多和更好的数据来验证现有的 CBC 绝对风险模型,并描述具有各种乳腺癌亚型和危险因素的女性的区域和远处复发以及非乳腺癌原因导致的死亡的风险。