Simon Fraser University, Canada.
Nurturely, United States.
Infant Behav Dev. 2022 Aug;68:101732. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2022.101732. Epub 2022 Jun 24.
Literature on infant emotion is dominated by research conducted in Western, industrialized societies where early socialization is characterized by face-to-face, vocal communication with caregivers. There is a dearth of knowledge of infant emotion in the context of social interaction outside of the visual and vocal modalities. In a three-population cross-cultural comparison, we used the still-face task to measure variation in behavior among infants from proximal care (practicing high levels of physical contact) communities in Bolivia and distal care (emphasizing vocal and visual interaction) communities in the U.S. and Fiji. In a modified version of the face-to-face still-face (FFSF), Study 1, infants in the U.S. and Fiji displayed the typical behavioral response to the still-face episode: increased negative affect and decreased social engagement, whereas infants in Bolivia showed no change. For tactile behavior, infants in Bolivia showed an increase in tactile self-stimulation from the interaction episode to the still-face episode, whereas U.S. infants showed no change. In Study 2, we created a novel body-to-body version of the still-face paradigm ("still-body") with infants in US and Bolivia, to mimic the near-constant physical contact Bolivian infants experience. The U.S. and Bolivian infant response was similar to Study 1: US infants showed decreased positive affect and increased negative affect and decreased social engagement from the interaction to the still-body episode and Bolivian infants showed no change. Notably, there were overall differences in infant behaviors between the two paradigms (FFSF and Still-Body). Infants in Bolivia and the U.S. showed increased positive facial affect during the FFSF paradigm in comparison with the Still-Body paradigm. Our results demonstrate the need for more globally representative developmental research and a broader approach to infant emotion and communication.
婴儿情绪方面的文献主要以西方工业化社会的研究为基础,这些社会的早期社会化以与照顾者进行面对面、有声的交流为特征。关于社会互动之外的视觉和听觉模式下婴儿情绪的知识还很匮乏。在一个三人群体的跨文化比较中,我们使用静止面孔任务来衡量来自玻利维亚的近距离护理(实践高水平身体接触)社区和美国和斐济的远距离护理(强调声音和视觉互动)社区的婴儿之间的行为差异。在面对面静止面孔(FFSF)的一个修改版本中,研究 1 中,美国和斐济的婴儿对静止面孔片段表现出典型的行为反应:负面情绪增加,社交参与减少,而玻利维亚的婴儿则没有变化。对于触觉行为,玻利维亚的婴儿在互动片段到静止面孔片段之间表现出触觉自我刺激的增加,而美国的婴儿则没有变化。在研究 2 中,我们在美国和玻利维亚的婴儿中创建了一个新的身体对身体静止面孔范式(“静止身体”),以模拟玻利维亚婴儿经历的近乎持续的身体接触。美国和玻利维亚婴儿的反应与研究 1 相似:美国婴儿从互动到静止身体片段的积极情绪减少,负面情绪增加,社交参与减少,而玻利维亚婴儿则没有变化。值得注意的是,两种范式(FFSF 和静止身体)之间的婴儿行为存在总体差异。与静止身体范式相比,玻利维亚和美国的婴儿在 FFSF 范式中表现出更多的积极面部表情。我们的研究结果表明,需要进行更具全球代表性的发展研究,并采用更广泛的方法来研究婴儿的情绪和沟通。