• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜和开腹结直肠癌手术后护理需求:德国初级保健中的索赔数据分析。

Need for nursing care after laparoscopic and open colorectal cancer surgery: a claims data analysis in German primary care.

机构信息

Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.

Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022 Nov;407(7):2937-2944. doi: 10.1007/s00423-022-02592-8. Epub 2022 Jun 27.

DOI:10.1007/s00423-022-02592-8
PMID:35761148
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9640437/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Our study analyzes the influence of minimally invasive vs. open surgery on the postoperative need for nursing care in patients with colorectal carcinoma. Colorectal cancer is an age-related disease, and oncologic surgery is increasingly performed in elderly patients. Long-term effects of the procedural choice on patients' self-sufficiency and autonomy have not been scientifically addressed so far.

METHODS

Multivariable logistic regression models based on claims data from a statutory health insurer (AOK, Baden-Württemberg, Germany) were applied to assess potential risk factors for assignment patients to a nursing care level, a German scale to categorize individual need for nursing care, at 12 and 36 months after colorectal cancer surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 3996 patients were eligible to be included in the analysis. At 36 months postoperatively, 44 of 427 (10.3%) patients after minimally invasive colon cancer surgery and 231 of 1287 (17.9%) patients after open procedure were newly graded into a nursing care level (OR = 0.62, 95%CI = 0.44-0.90, p = 0.010). Thirty-four of 251 (13.5%) patients receiving minimally invasive rectal cancer surgery compared to 142 of 602 (23.6%) patients after open approach were newly assigned to a nursing care level (OR = 0.53, 95%CI = 0.34-0.81, p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopically assisted resection of colorectal cancer seems to be superior in preserving physical autonomy of elderly patients with colorectal cancer.

摘要

目的

我们的研究分析了微创与开放手术对结直肠癌患者术后护理需求的影响。结直肠癌是一种与年龄相关的疾病,老年患者越来越多地接受肿瘤手术。迄今为止,尚未从科学角度探讨手术方案选择对患者自理能力和自主性的长期影响。

方法

基于法定健康保险公司(AOK,巴登-符腾堡州,德国)的索赔数据,应用多变量逻辑回归模型,评估将患者分配至护理水平(德国护理需求分类量表)的潜在风险因素,该量表用于分类结直肠癌手术后 12 个月和 36 个月的个体护理需求。

结果

共有 3996 例患者符合纳入分析标准。术后 36 个月时,427 例微创结肠癌手术后的患者中有 44 例(10.3%)和 1287 例开腹手术后的患者中有 231 例(17.9%)新分级为护理级别(OR=0.62,95%CI=0.44-0.90,p=0.010)。251 例接受微创直肠癌手术的患者中有 34 例(13.5%)和 602 例开腹手术的患者中有 142 例(23.6%)新分配到护理级别(OR=0.53,95%CI=0.34-0.81,p=0.003)。

结论

腹腔镜辅助结直肠癌切除术在保留老年结直肠癌患者的身体自主性方面似乎更具优势。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6e4/9640437/c8519896c65f/423_2022_2592_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6e4/9640437/c8519896c65f/423_2022_2592_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6e4/9640437/c8519896c65f/423_2022_2592_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Need for nursing care after laparoscopic and open colorectal cancer surgery: a claims data analysis in German primary care.腹腔镜和开腹结直肠癌手术后护理需求:德国初级保健中的索赔数据分析。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022 Nov;407(7):2937-2944. doi: 10.1007/s00423-022-02592-8. Epub 2022 Jun 27.
2
Long-term results of laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection.腹腔镜结直肠癌切除术的长期结果
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Apr 16;2008(2):CD003432. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003432.pub2.
3
Surgical treatment of rectal cancer patients aged 80 years and older-a German nationwide analysis comparing short- and long-term survival after laparoscopic and open tumor resection.80 岁及以上直肠癌患者的外科治疗——一项德国全国性分析,比较腹腔镜和开放肿瘤切除术后的短期和长期生存。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019 Sep;45(9):1607-1612. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.05.005. Epub 2019 May 9.
4
Long-term oncologic outcomes after laparoscopic versus open rectal cancer resection: a high-quality population-based analysis in a Southern German district.腹腔镜与开腹直肠切除术治疗直肠癌的长期肿瘤学结果:德国南部地区一项高质量的基于人群的分析。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Oct;32(10):4096-4104. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6148-6. Epub 2018 Apr 2.
5
Long term outcomes of simultaneous laparoscopic versus open resection for colorectal cancer with synchronous liver metastases.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗结直肠癌合并同步肝转移的长期疗效比较。
Asian J Surg. 2019 Jan;42(1):217-223. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2018.04.006. Epub 2018 May 25.
6
[Meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open surgery for palliative resection of the primary tumor in stage IV colorectal cancer].[腹腔镜手术与开放手术用于IV期结直肠癌原发肿瘤姑息性切除的荟萃分析]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Jun 25;23(6):589-596. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn.441530-20190619-00247.
7
Minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer. Initial follow-up.结直肠癌的微创手术。初步随访。
Ann Surg. 1996 Jun;223(6):790-6; discussion 796-8. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199606000-00017.
8
Improving conventional recovery with enhanced recovery in minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer.改善直肠癌微创手术中常规康复的加速康复。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2014 May;57(5):557-63. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000101.
9
Laparoscopic and minimally invasive resection of malignant colorectal disease.腹腔镜及微创切除恶性结直肠疾病
Surg Clin North Am. 2008 Oct;88(5):1047-72, vii. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2008.05.009.
10
The cost of conversion in robotic and laparoscopic colorectal surgery.机器人和腹腔镜结直肠手术的转换成本。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Mar;32(3):1515-1524. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5839-8. Epub 2017 Sep 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Construction and application of composite insulation scheme in the perioperative period of patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery.腹腔镜结直肠癌手术患者围手术期复合保温方案的构建与应用
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2025 May 27;17(5):100428. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i5.100428.
2
Evidence-based control of stress response on intraoperative physiological indexes and recovery of patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery.基于证据的胃肠道手术患者术中应激反应对生理指标及恢复的控制
World J Gastroenterol. 2025 Feb 28;31(8):102331. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i8.102331.
3
Evaluation and analysis of neurocognitive dysfunction in patients with colorectal cancer after radical resection: A retrospective study.

本文引用的文献

1
Frailty Factors and Outcomes in Vascular Surgery Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.血管外科患者衰弱因素及结局的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Surg. 2020 Aug;272(2):266-276. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003642.
2
Cancer statistics, 2020.癌症统计数据,2020 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2020 Jan;70(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21590. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
3
Frailty: implications for clinical practice and public health.虚弱:对临床实践和公共卫生的影响。
结直肠癌根治术后患者神经认知功能障碍的评估与分析:一项回顾性研究。
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2024 Sep 27;16(9):2893-2901. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i9.2893.
4
Effects of modular nursing model for typical issues on enteral nutrition status, immune function, and quality of life in colon cancer patients.模块化护理模式对结肠癌患者肠内营养状况、免疫功能及生活质量典型问题的影响。
Heliyon. 2023 Dec 2;10(1):e23208. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23208. eCollection 2024 Jan 15.
5
The effect of pain-education nursing based on a mind map on postoperative pain score and quality of life in patients with colorectal cancer.思维导图为基础的疼痛教育护理对结直肠癌患者术后疼痛评分和生活质量的影响。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 May 12;102(19):e33562. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000033562.
6
Micro video incentive nursing intervention improves the psychological state and quality of life in patients with rectal cancer after enterostomy.微视频激励护理干预改善直肠癌造口术后患者的心理状态和生活质量。
Am J Transl Res. 2023 Mar 15;15(3):2040-2048. eCollection 2023.
Lancet. 2019 Oct 12;394(10206):1365-1375. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31786-6.
4
The Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam: cohort update 2019 and additional data collections.阿姆斯特丹纵向老龄化研究:2019 年队列更新及其他数据收集。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2020 Jan;35(1):61-74. doi: 10.1007/s10654-019-00541-2. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
5
Frailty in Older Patients Undergoing Emergency Laparotomy: Results From the UK Observational Emergency Laparotomy and Frailty (ELF) Study.老年急诊剖腹手术患者的脆弱性:来自英国观察性急诊剖腹手术和脆弱性(ELF)研究的结果。
Ann Surg. 2021 Apr 1;273(4):709-718. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003402.
6
Open Versus Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Versus Transanal Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.经肛门直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌:开放手术、腹腔镜手术、机器人手术与经肛门手术的系统评价与网络荟萃分析。
Ann Surg. 2019 Jul;270(1):59-68. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003227.
7
Disease-free Survival and Local Recurrence for Laparoscopic Resection Compared With Open Resection of Stage II to III Rectal Cancer: Follow-up Results of the ACOSOG Z6051 Randomized Controlled Trial.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗 II 期至 III 期直肠癌的无病生存和局部复发比较:ACOSOG Z6051 随机对照试验的随访结果。
Ann Surg. 2019 Apr;269(4):589-595. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003002.
8
Laparoscopic vs Open Surgery for Colorectal Liver Metastases.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗结直肠癌肝转移的比较。
JAMA Surg. 2018 Nov 1;153(11):1028-1035. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.2107.
9
Laparoscopic Versus Open Resection for Colorectal Liver Metastases: The OSLO-COMET Randomized Controlled Trial.腹腔镜与开腹结直肠肝转移灶切除术的比较:OSLO-COMET 随机对照试验。
Ann Surg. 2018 Feb;267(2):199-207. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002353.
10
Open versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Advanced Low Rectal Cancer: A Large, Multicenter, Propensity Score Matched Cohort Study in Japan.开腹与腹腔镜手术治疗中低位进展期直肠癌:日本一项大型多中心倾向评分匹配队列研究。
Ann Surg. 2018 Aug;268(2):318-324. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002329.