Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022 Oct;62(5):720-724. doi: 10.1111/ajo.13556. Epub 2022 Jun 28.
Loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion is performed in both an inpatient setting under general anaesthesia and an outpatient setting under local anaesthesia. Efficacy and safety are comparable and outpatient LEEP may save time and cost in the Australian setting.
We aim to compare patient satisfaction with inpatient LEEP compared to outpatient LEEP for Australian best practice.
This was a prospective quantitative and qualitative cohort study. An online questionnaire was sent to patients undergoing inpatient and outpatient LEEP to assess satisfaction with the procedure. Further histopathological and demographic data were also collected from the medical records. Groups were compared using Fischer's exact test and pain scores were compared using non-parametric tests.
Ninety-three outpatients and 52 inpatients responded to the survey. No difference was found between groups with regard to rate of positive histopathological margins or number of passes required. Outpatients found the procedure to be more convenient than inpatients (P = 0.007), and experienced more pain during the procedure than the inpatient group (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in pain scores following the procedure or post-procedure anxiety.
Outpatient LEEP is an acceptable and well-tolerated procedure, comparable to inpatient LEEP. Regardless of the option chosen, patients are highly likely to be satisfied with their choice. Increased efforts should be made to reduce pre-procedural anxiety, which may in turn reduce expectations and experiences of pain.
对于高级别鳞状上皮内病变,环行电切术(LEEP)既可以在全麻下于住院部进行,也可以在局麻下于门诊部进行。这两种治疗方式的疗效和安全性相当,而在澳大利亚,门诊 LEEP 可能会节省时间和费用。
我们旨在比较澳大利亚最佳实践中,住院部 LEEP 与门诊部 LEEP 治疗的患者满意度。
这是一项前瞻性的定量和定性队列研究。我们向接受住院部和门诊部 LEEP 的患者发送了在线问卷,以评估他们对该手术的满意度。同时还从病历中收集了进一步的组织病理学和人口统计学数据。使用 Fisher 确切检验比较组间差异,使用非参数检验比较疼痛评分。
共有 93 名门诊患者和 52 名住院患者对调查做出了回应。在阳性组织学切缘率或所需手术次数方面,两组之间没有差异。门诊患者认为该手术比住院患者更方便(P=0.007),且手术过程中的疼痛程度比住院患者更严重(P<0.001)。术后和术后焦虑时的疼痛评分无显著差异。
门诊 LEEP 是一种可接受且耐受良好的手术,与住院部 LEEP 相当。无论选择哪种方式,患者都极有可能对自己的选择感到满意。应加大力度减轻术前焦虑,这可能会降低患者对疼痛的预期和体验。