Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.
Department of Community and Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2024 May 1;25(5):1699-1705. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2024.25.5.1699.
The prevention of cervical cancer can be achieved by treating high-grade cervical precancerous lesions. Treatment options for cervical precancer include excisional procedures, and ablation treatments. Despite the long pre-invasive course of the disease, literature addressing sexual function post-treatment for cervical pre-invasive lesions is scarce. This study aims to bridge this gap and assess the sexual function and the acceptability, efficacy, safety, and complications of loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) versus thermal ablation.
The prospective open-label randomized controlled trial recruited women aged 22-55 with histologically confirmed Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia (CIN) 2 and 3 lesions. Participants were randomly allocated to either thermal ablation or LEEP. All cases were followed up with a Pap smear at three- and six-months post treatment. Sexual health assessments were conducted using a questionnaire at baseline and 3 months post-procedure. Secondary outcome measures included comparison of acceptability, pain, and side effects between the two treatment measures.
Out of 1356 screened cases, 60 were included in the study and randomized in two groups. The groups had similar baseline characteristics. Duration of LEEP was longer than thermal ablation (25.33 vs. 20.67 minutes), with higher pain reported 10 minutes post-procedure in the LEEP group. Three months post-procedure, both groups showed comparable acceptability and symptom relief. Sexual function parameters significantly improved in the thermal ablation group compared to LEEP, including satisfaction, desire, lubrication, flexibility, and ability to reach climax.
LEEP and thermal ablation are effective treatments for CIN with similar efficacy at 6 months. Thermal ablation demonstrated advantages in procedure time and post-procedural pain but exhibited varying effects on sexual function, improving satisfaction and desire. In contrast, LEEP showed a decrease in satisfaction and potential alterations in lubrication and flexibility. Larger-sample, longer-term studies are recommended for further insights.
通过治疗高级别宫颈癌前病变,可以预防宫颈癌。宫颈癌前病变的治疗方法包括切除性手术和消融治疗。尽管疾病具有较长的侵袭前过程,但针对宫颈癌前病变治疗后性功能的文献却很少。本研究旨在填补这一空白,并评估环形电切术(LEEP)与热消融治疗宫颈癌前病变后的性功能以及接受程度、疗效、安全性和并发症。
这项前瞻性、开放性、随机对照试验招募了年龄在 22-55 岁之间、组织学确诊为宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN)2 级和 3 级的女性患者。参与者被随机分配到热消融或 LEEP 组。所有病例均在治疗后 3 个月和 6 个月进行巴氏涂片随访。在基线和治疗后 3 个月使用问卷进行性健康评估。次要结局指标包括两种治疗方法的接受程度、疼痛和副作用的比较。
在筛选的 1356 例病例中,有 60 例纳入研究并随机分为两组。两组基线特征相似。LEEP 组的手术时间长于热消融组(25.33 分钟 vs. 20.67 分钟),LEEP 组在术后 10 分钟时报告的疼痛更严重。治疗后 3 个月,两组的接受程度和症状缓解情况相似。与 LEEP 组相比,热消融组的性功能参数在治疗后显著改善,包括满意度、欲望、润滑、灵活性和达到性高潮的能力。
LEEP 和热消融是治疗 CIN 的有效方法,在 6 个月时疗效相似。热消融在手术时间和术后疼痛方面具有优势,但对性功能的影响不同,可提高满意度和欲望。相比之下,LEEP 会降低满意度,并可能改变润滑和灵活性。建议进行更大样本量、更长期的研究以进一步深入了解。