The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute/The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 28;17(6):e0269112. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269112. eCollection 2022.
Despite the high prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and concurrent use of opioid therapy, no large-scale population studies have investigated whether opioid use and pre-existing OSA may interact synergistically to increase the risk of adverse health consequences. To address this knowledge gap, we conducted a retrospective cohort study using provincial health administrative data to evaluate whether the combined presence of opioid use and OSA increases the risk of adverse health consequences, such as mortality, hospitalizations, and emergency department (ED) visits; and if it does, whether this co-occurrence has synergistic clinical relevance.
We included all adults who underwent a diagnostic sleep study in Ontario, Canada, between 2013 and 2016. Individuals were considered exposed to opioids if they filled a prescription that overlapped with the date of their sleep study (Opioid+). Individuals with at least a 50% probability of having a diagnosis of moderate to severe OSA (OSA+) were identified using a previously externally validated case-ascertainment model. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality; secondary outcomes were all-cause or ischemic heart disease hospitalizations, all-cause ED visits, and motor vehicle collisions (MVC) requiring hospital or ED visit. We used multivariable Cox regression models to compare hazards between four mutually exclusive groups: (1) Opioid+ OSA+; (2) Opioid+ OSA-; (3) Opioid- OSA+, and (4) OSA- Opioid- (reference for comparison). Relative excess risks due to interaction (RERI) were calculated to test for additive interaction.
Of 300,663 adults who underwent a sleep study, 15,713 (5.2%) were considered as Opioid+ and 128,351 (42.7%) as OSA+. Over a median of two years, 6,223 (2.1%) died from any cause. Regardless of OSA status, opioid use at the date of the sleep study was associated with an increased hazard for all-cause mortality with the greatest hazard associated with Opioid+ OSA- (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 1.75, 95% CI 1.57-1.94), but not Opioid+ OSA+ (aHR: 1.14, 95% CI 1.02-1.27) as hypothesized. Regardless of OSA status, opioid use at the date of the sleep study was associated with an increased hazard for all secondary outcomes. Opioid+ OSA+ was associated with the greatest hazards of all-cause hospitalizations (aHR 1.55, 95% CI 1.49-1.61) and MVC (aHR of 1.39; 95% CI 1.09-1.77); however, no statistically significant synergistic effects were observed.
Adults referred for sleep disorder assessment who used opioids had a significantly increased hazard of adverse health outcomes than those who did not, regardless of whether they had a high probability of moderate to severe OSA. The use of opioids and OSA was associated with the greatest hazard of all-cause hospitalizations and MVC requiring hospital or ED visit. The interaction of opioids and OSA did not confer a synergistic risk for poor outcomes.
尽管阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)的患病率很高,且同时使用阿片类药物治疗,但尚无大规模人群研究调查阿片类药物使用和预先存在的 OSA 是否可能协同作用,从而增加不良健康后果的风险。为了解决这一知识空白,我们使用省级卫生行政数据进行了回顾性队列研究,以评估阿片类药物使用和 OSA 同时存在是否会增加不良健康后果(如死亡、住院和急诊就诊)的风险;如果是这样,这种共同发生是否具有协同的临床意义。
我们纳入了 2013 年至 2016 年期间在加拿大安大略省进行诊断性睡眠研究的所有成年人。如果他们在睡眠研究日期重叠期间开了处方(Opioid+),则认为他们接触过阿片类药物。使用先前经过外部验证的病例确定模型确定至少有 50%的可能性被诊断为中重度 OSA(OSA+)的个体。主要结局是全因死亡率;次要结局是全因或缺血性心脏病住院、全因急诊就诊和需要住院或急诊就诊的机动车碰撞(MVC)。我们使用多变量 Cox 回归模型比较了四个互斥组之间的危险:(1)Opioid+ OSA+;(2)Opioid+ OSA-;(3)Opioid- OSA+和(4)OSA- Opioid-(比较的参考)。计算相对超额风险比(RERI)以检验相加性交互作用。
在 300,663 名接受睡眠研究的成年人中,有 15,713 人(5.2%)被认为是 Opioid+,128,351 人(42.7%)被认为是 OSA+。在两年的中位数期间,有 6,223 人(2.1%)死于任何原因。无论 OSA 状态如何,睡眠研究当天使用阿片类药物与全因死亡率的危险增加有关,与 Opioid+ OSA-(调整后的危险比 [aHR]:1.75,95%置信区间 [CI]:1.57-1.94)相比,风险最大,但 Opioid+ OSA+(aHR:1.14,95% CI:1.02-1.27)并不符合假设。无论 OSA 状态如何,睡眠研究当天使用阿片类药物与所有次要结局的危险增加有关。Opioid+ OSA+与全因住院(aHR 1.55,95% CI 1.49-1.61)和 MVC(aHR 1.39;95% CI 1.09-1.77)的最大危险相关;然而,没有观察到统计学上显著的协同作用。
接受睡眠障碍评估的成年人如果使用阿片类药物,其不良健康结局的风险显著高于未使用阿片类药物的成年人,无论他们是否有中重度 OSA 的高概率。阿片类药物的使用和 OSA 与全因住院和需要住院或急诊就诊的 MVC 的最大危险相关。阿片类药物和 OSA 的相互作用不会增加不良结局的协同风险。