• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于人群的结直肠癌筛查项目中,由护士主导的移动信息增强教育可提高结肠镜检查的肠道准备质量:一项随机对照试验。

Nurse-led reinforced education by mobile messenger improves the quality of bowel preparation of colonoscopy in a population-based colorectal cancer screening program: A randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Institute of Digestive Disease, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Stanley Ho Big Data Decision Analytics Research Centre, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong; The Jockey Club School of Public Health & Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/ThomasYTLam.

Institute of Digestive Disease, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Nurs Stud. 2022 Sep;133:104301. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2022.104301. Epub 2022 May 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2022.104301
PMID:35764027
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Adequate bowel preparation is an important colonoscopy quality indicator. Reinforced education is effective in improving bowel preparation quality of colonoscopy with mixed indications. However, it remains unclear whether such improvement can be consistently observed in pre- and post-irrigation during colonoscopy in screening population.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to study the effectiveness of nurse-led reinforced education delivered via mobile messenger (WhatsApp Messenger) on pre- and post-irrigation bowel preparation adequacy in colonoscopies for positive fecal immunochemical test in a population-based colorectal cancer screening program.

DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

A hospital-based endoscopy centre in Hong Kong, China.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients undergoing colonoscopy for positive fecal immunochemical test in a population-based colorectal cancer screening program.

METHODS

The recruited patients were randomized to receive either WhatsApp Reinforced Education (WRE) or No Reinforced Education (NRE) (1:1). Patients in WRE group received one-off reinforced education of bowel preparation in text and video formats via WhatsApp Messenger four days prior to colonoscopy sent by investigator while NRE group received standard-of-care only. Primary outcome was the bowel preparation adequacy rate as evaluated by Aronchick Scale. Secondary outcomes included bowel preparation adequacy rate as evaluated by Boston Bowel Preparation Scale, adenoma detection rate and risk factors of bowel preparation inadequacy. Continuous variables were described as means with standard deviation (SD) and analyzed with Student's t-test. The Pearson Chi Square Test or Fisher Exact Test was used to assess categorical variables when appropriate. Risk factors were determined by logistic regression.

RESULTS

From July 2017 to April 2019, 685 eligible patients were randomized to WRE (n = 343) and NRE (n = 342) groups. Patients in WRE group had higher bowel preparation adequacy rate as evaluated by Aronchik Scale (83.4% vs 75.4%, p = 0.010) and Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (94.2% vs 88.9%, p = 0.013). Adenoma detection rate was higher in WRE group but without statistical significance (71.4% vs 67.5%, p = 0.27). In logistic regression, WhatsApp Reinforced Education reduced the inadequate bowel preparation risk (Adjusted odds ratio: 0.564; 95% confidence interval: 0.371-0.856, p = 0.007). Male gender (Adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 1.638; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.054-2.546, p = 0.028) and diabetes (AOR: 2.062; 95% CI: 1.215-3.497, p = 0.007) were risk factors of bowel preparation inadequacy.

CONCLUSIONS

Nurse-led mobile messenger-initiated reinforced education improves both pre- and post-irrigation bowel preparation quality of screening colonoscopy following positive fecal immunochemical test. It is readily incorporable in clinical practice because of its low setup cost.

REGISTRATION NUMBER

Registered on 4 July 2017 on https://clinicaltrials.gov/ (NCT03209739).

摘要

背景

充分的肠道准备是结肠镜检查质量的一个重要指标。强化教育对于改善混合适应证结肠镜检查的肠道准备质量是有效的。然而,在筛查人群中,结肠镜检查前和后冲洗时,这种改善是否能够持续观察,目前尚不清楚。

目的

我们旨在研究护士主导的基于移动消息(WhatsApp 消息)的强化教育对基于人群的结直肠癌筛查计划中阳性粪便免疫化学试验行结肠镜检查的前和后冲洗肠道准备充分性的影响。

设计

随机对照试验。

设置

中国香港一家医院内镜中心。

参与者

接受基于人群的结直肠癌筛查计划中阳性粪便免疫化学试验行结肠镜检查的患者。

方法

招募的患者被随机分为 WhatsApp 强化教育(WRE)组或无强化教育(NRE)组(1:1)。WRE 组患者在结肠镜检查前 4 天通过研究者通过 WhatsApp 消息接收一次性肠道准备强化教育,包括文本和视频格式,而 NRE 组仅接受标准护理。主要结局是采用 Aronchick 量表评估的肠道准备充分率。次要结局包括采用波士顿肠道准备量表评估的肠道准备充分率、腺瘤检出率和肠道准备不充分的危险因素。连续变量以平均值和标准差(SD)表示,并采用学生 t 检验进行分析。适当情况下,采用 Pearson 卡方检验或 Fisher 确切检验评估分类变量。采用 logistic 回归确定危险因素。

结果

2017 年 7 月至 2019 年 4 月,共有 685 名符合条件的患者被随机分配到 WRE(n=343)和 NRE(n=342)组。WRE 组采用 Aronchik 量表评估的肠道准备充分率(83.4% vs 75.4%,p=0.010)和波士顿肠道准备量表评估的肠道准备充分率(94.2% vs 88.9%,p=0.013)更高。WRE 组腺瘤检出率较高,但无统计学意义(71.4% vs 67.5%,p=0.27)。logistic 回归显示,WhatsApp 强化教育降低了肠道准备不充分的风险(调整后的优势比:0.564;95%置信区间:0.371-0.856,p=0.007)。男性(调整后的优势比[OR]:1.638;95%置信区间[CI]:1.054-2.546,p=0.028)和糖尿病(OR:2.062;95%CI:1.215-3.497,p=0.007)是肠道准备不充分的危险因素。

结论

护士主导的基于移动消息的强化教育可改善阳性粪便免疫化学试验后筛查结肠镜检查的前和后冲洗肠道准备质量。由于其设置成本低,因此很容易纳入临床实践。

注册号

2017 年 7 月 4 日在 https://clinicaltrials.gov/(NCT03209739)注册。

相似文献

1
Nurse-led reinforced education by mobile messenger improves the quality of bowel preparation of colonoscopy in a population-based colorectal cancer screening program: A randomized controlled trial.基于人群的结直肠癌筛查项目中,由护士主导的移动信息增强教育可提高结肠镜检查的肠道准备质量:一项随机对照试验。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2022 Sep;133:104301. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2022.104301. Epub 2022 May 30.
2
Smartphone Application to Reinforce Education Increases High-Quality Preparation for Colorectal Cancer Screening Colonoscopies in a Randomized Trial.智能手机应用强化教育可提高随机试验中结直肠癌筛查结肠镜检查的高质量准备率。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Feb;19(2):331-338.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.03.051. Epub 2020 Mar 30.
3
Improving the quality and acceptance of colonoscopy preparation by reinforced patient education with short message service: results from a randomized, multicenter study (PERICLES-II).强化短信服务的患者教育以提高结肠镜检查准备质量和接受度:一项随机、多中心研究(PERICLES-II)的结果。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Mar;89(3):506-513.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.08.014. Epub 2018 Aug 21.
4
Fecal occult blood test for colorectal cancer screening: an evidence-based analysis.用于结直肠癌筛查的粪便潜血试验:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2009;9(10):1-40. Epub 2009 Sep 1.
5
Effect of WeChat and short message service on bowel preparation: an endoscopist-blinded, randomized controlled trial.微信和短信服务对肠道准备的影响:一项内镜医师盲法随机对照试验
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Feb;31(2):170-177. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000001303.
6
Different bowel preparation schedule leads to different diagnostic yield of proximal and nonpolypoid colorectal neoplasm at screening colonoscopy in average-risk population.不同的肠道准备方案在平均风险人群的筛查结肠镜检查中导致近端和非息肉样结直肠肿瘤的诊断率不同。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2011 Dec;54(12):1570-7. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e318231d667.
7
Impact of reinforced education by telephone and short message service on the quality of bowel preparation: a randomized controlled study.电话和短信强化教育对肠道准备质量的影响:一项随机对照研究。
Endoscopy. 2015 Nov;47(11):1018-27. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1392406. Epub 2015 Jul 16.
8
Impact of Bowel Preparation Quality on Colonoscopy Findings and Colorectal Cancer Deaths in a Nation-Wide Colorectal Cancer Screening Program.全国结直肠癌筛查项目中肠道准备质量对结肠镜检查结果和结直肠癌死亡的影响。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2024 Oct 1;119(10):2036-2044. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002880. Epub 2024 Jun 20.
9
Split-dose bowel preparation improves adequacy of bowel preparation and gastroenterologists' adherence to National Colorectal Cancer Screening and Surveillance Guidelines.分剂量肠道准备可提高肠道准备的充分性和胃肠病学家对国家结直肠癌筛查和监测指南的遵循程度。
World J Gastroenterol. 2018 Feb 14;24(6):716-724. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i6.716.
10
Modifiable endoscopic factors that influence the adenoma detection rate in colorectal cancer screening colonoscopies.可调整的内镜因素对结直肠癌筛查结肠镜检查中腺瘤检出率的影响。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Mar;77(3):381-389.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.09.027. Epub 2012 Dec 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of Risk Prevention Management Based on Heinrich's Law in Nursing Care of Elderly Patients Undergoing Digestive Endoscopy.基于海因里希法则的风险预防管理在老年消化内镜患者护理中的应用效果
Pak J Med Sci. 2024 Dec;40(11):2502-2507. doi: 10.12669/pjms.40.11.10744.
2
Bowel preparation experiences and needs before follow-up colonoscopy in older adult postoperative colorectal cancer patients: A qualitative study.老年成人术后结直肠癌患者随访结肠镜检查前的肠道准备经历与需求:一项定性研究
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2024 Sep 27;16(9):2968-2978. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i9.2968.
3
Development and validation of a novel scoring system based on a nomogram for predicting inadequate bowel preparation.
基于列线图的预测不充分肠道准备新型评分系统的建立与验证。
Clin Transl Oncol. 2024 Sep;26(9):2262-2273. doi: 10.1007/s12094-024-03443-2. Epub 2024 Apr 2.
4
Enhancing bowel preparation quality and tolerability in a low health literacy population in Western China: a multicenter randomized trial.提高中国西部低健康素养人群的肠道准备质量和耐受性:一项多中心随机试验。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023 Dec;149(20):17957-17971. doi: 10.1007/s00432-023-05493-5. Epub 2023 Nov 15.
5
Effectiveness of bowel preparation innovative technology instructions (BPITIs) on clinical outcomes among patients undergoing colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.肠道准备创新技术指导(BPITIs)对结肠镜检查患者临床结局的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 4;13(1):10783. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-37044-w.