Department of Internal Medicine III, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Quality Assurance Working Group, Austrian Society of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Vienna, Austria.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2024 Oct 1;119(10):2036-2044. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002880. Epub 2024 Jun 20.
Adequate bowel preparation is paramount for a high-quality screening colonoscopy. Despite the importance of adequate bowel preparation, there is a lack of large studies that associated the degree of bowel preparation with long-term colorectal cancer outcomes in screening patients.
In a large population-based screening program database in Austria, quality of bowel preparation was estimated according to the Aronchick Scale by the endoscopist (excellent, good, fair, poor, and inadequate bowel preparation). We used logistic regression to assess the influence of bowel preparation on the detection of different polyp types and the interphysician variation in bowel preparation scoring. Time-to-event analyses were performed to investigate the association of bowel preparation with postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC) death.
A total of 335,466 colonoscopies between January 2012 and follow-up until December 2022 were eligible for the analyses. As compared with excellent bowel preparation, adenoma detection was not significantly lower for good bowel preparation (odds ratio 1.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.9971-1.0329, P = 0.1023); however, adenoma detection was significantly lower in fair bowel preparation (odds ratio 0.97, 95% CI 0.9408-0.9939, P = 0.0166). Individuals who had fair or lower bowel preparation at screening colonoscopy had significantly higher hazards for PCCRC death (hazard ratio for fair bowel preparation 2.56, 95% CI 1.67-3.94, P < 0.001).
Fair bowel preparation on the Aronchick Scale was not only associated with a lower adenoma detection probability but also with increased risk of PCCRC death. Efforts should be made to increase bowel cleansing above fair scores.
充分的肠道准备对于高质量的筛查结肠镜检查至关重要。尽管肠道准备的充分性很重要,但缺乏大型研究将肠道准备程度与筛查患者的长期结直肠癌结果相关联。
在奥地利的一个大型基于人群的筛查计划数据库中,肠道准备质量由内镜医生根据 Aronchick 量表进行评估(优秀、良好、一般、差和准备不足)。我们使用逻辑回归来评估肠道准备对不同息肉类型检测的影响以及肠道准备评分的医师间变异性。进行时间事件分析以调查肠道准备与结肠镜检查后结直肠癌(PCCRC)死亡的关联。
2012 年 1 月至 2022 年 12 月随访期间,共进行了 335466 例结肠镜检查,符合分析条件。与优秀的肠道准备相比,良好的肠道准备对腺瘤的检出率没有显著降低(比值比 1.01,95%置信区间[CI]0.9971-1.0329,P=0.1023);然而,一般的肠道准备的腺瘤检出率显著降低(比值比 0.97,95%CI 0.9408-0.9939,P=0.0166)。在筛查结肠镜检查时肠道准备为一般或较差的个体,PCCRC 死亡的风险显著增加(一般肠道准备的危险比为 2.56,95%CI 1.67-3.94,P<0.001)。
Aronchick 量表上的一般肠道准备不仅与较低的腺瘤检出率相关,而且与 PCCRC 死亡风险增加相关。应努力将肠道清洁度提高到一般以上的分数。