Master of Public Health Program, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York (Dr Meredith); School of Public Health, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois (Drs Welter, Seweryn, Altfeld, and Jarpe-Ratner); and de Beaumont Foundation, Bethesda, Maryland (Dr Risley).
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2022;28(5):513-524. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001537. Epub 2022 Jun 28.
Schools and programs of public health have been preparing graduates to join the workforce for a century, but significant gaps in numbers and abilities exit. Many have called for a change to the status quo, to transform public health education to create a competent workforce able to address current and emergent needs.
This study explored if Master of Public Health (MPH) programs have shifted their program design, curriculum, and/or instructional methods (instructional design), and if so, how and why.
A sequential mixed-methods study.
MPH programs accredited by the Council on Education for Public Health, and approved applicants.
Some 43% of accredited MPH programs in the United States (n = 115) responded to the online survey (open November 21, 2019-December 20, 2019), providing a representative sample. Stratified purposeful sampling was used to select 8 MPH programs for follow-up semistructured interviews. Categorical and qualitative data were analyzed for trends, association, and themes.
Degree of, types of, and reasons for shifts in MPH program instructional design considered and implemented.
MPH programs in the United States have shifted their approaches and curriculum to meet identified and emergent workforce needs. In the last 5 years, 81% made changes to program design (focal competencies, admissions, graduation criteria), 88% to curriculum (added or removed courses, changed course content), and 65% to pedagogical methods (where and how learning is supported).
Despite concerns about stagnation, MPH programs have shifted to competency-based education aligned with workforce needs, have adapted approaches to support diversity of future workers, and are focused on bolstering workforce readiness. These changes were made to enhance focus on knowledge acquisition, skills building, and professionalism, factors recognized as critical for success, and facilitate more engaged pedagogical strategies, working with communities for impact.
公共卫生领域的学校和项目已经培养了数以百计的毕业生来加入公共卫生行业,但在人数和能力方面仍存在明显差距。许多人呼吁改变现状,改变公共卫生教育模式,培养有能力应对当前和新出现需求的劳动力。
本研究旨在探讨公共卫生硕士(MPH)项目是否已经改变了其课程设计、课程和/或教学方法(教学设计),如果有,又是如何以及为何改变的。
一项顺序混合方法研究。
经美国公共卫生教育理事会认证并获得批准的 MPH 项目。
美国约有 43%(n=115)的经认证的 MPH 项目对在线调查做出了回应,该调查于 2019 年 11 月 21 日至 12 月 20 日开放,提供了具有代表性的样本。采用分层有目的抽样选择了 8 个 MPH 项目进行后续半结构化访谈。对分类和定性数据进行了分析,以了解趋势、关联和主题。
MPH 项目教学设计的变化类型、程度和原因。
美国的 MPH 项目已经调整了其方法和课程,以满足确定的和新出现的劳动力需求。在过去的 5 年中,81%的项目改变了课程设计(重点能力、招生、毕业标准),88%的项目改变了课程(增加或删除课程,改变课程内容),65%的项目改变了教学方法(学习支持的地点和方式)。
尽管人们对停滞不前表示担忧,但 MPH 项目已经转向基于能力的教育,以满足劳动力需求,调整方法以支持未来劳动力的多样性,并专注于增强劳动力准备度。这些变化是为了加强对知识获取、技能培养和专业精神的关注,这些因素被认为是成功的关键,并促进更具参与性的教学策略,与社区合作以产生影响。