• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于评估临床化学分析物测量不确定度的自上而下方法的临床实验室实用注意事项。

Practical Considerations for Clinical Laboratories in Top-down Approach for Assessing the Measurement Uncertainty of Clinical Chemistry Analytes.

机构信息

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Ann Lab Med. 2022 Nov 1;42(6):630-637. doi: 10.3343/alm.2022.42.6.630.

DOI:10.3343/alm.2022.42.6.630
PMID:35765871
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9277045/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The top-down (TD) approach using internal quality control (IQC) data is regarded a practical method for estimating measurement uncertainty (MU) in clinical laboratories. We estimated the MU of 14 clinical chemistry analytes using the TD approach and evaluated the effect of lot changes on the MU.

METHODS

MU values were estimated using subgrouping by reagent lot changes or using the data as a whole, and both methods were compared. Reagent lot change was simulated using randomly generated data, and the mean values and MU for two IQC datasets (different QC material lots) were compared using statistical methods.

RESULTS

All MU values calculated using subgrouping were lower than the total values; however, the average differences were minimal. The simulation showed that the greater the increase in the extent of the average shift, the larger the difference in MU. In IQC data comparison, the mean values and MU exhibited statistically significant differences for most analytes. The MU calculation methods gave rise to minimal differences, suggesting that IQC data in clinical laboratories show no significant shift. However, the simulation results demonstrated that notable differences in the MU can arise from significant variations in IQC results before and after a reagent lot change. Additionally, IQC material lots should be treated separately when IQC data are collected for MU estimation.

CONCLUSIONS

Lot changes in IQC data are a key factor affecting MU estimation and should not be overlooked during MU estimation.

摘要

背景

使用内部质量控制(IQC)数据的自上而下(TD)方法被认为是临床实验室估计测量不确定度(MU)的实用方法。我们使用 TD 方法估计了 14 个临床化学分析物的 MU,并评估了批变化对 MU 的影响。

方法

使用试剂批变化的分组或使用整个数据来估计 MU 值,并比较这两种方法。使用随机生成的数据模拟试剂批变化,并使用统计方法比较两个 IQC 数据集(不同 QC 材料批次)的平均值和 MU。

结果

使用分组计算的所有 MU 值均低于总数值,但平均差异最小。模拟结果表明,平均偏移量增加的幅度越大,MU 的差异就越大。在 IQC 数据比较中,大多数分析物的平均值和 MU 存在统计学差异。MU 计算方法的差异很小,表明临床实验室的 IQC 数据没有明显的偏移。然而,模拟结果表明,在试剂批变化前后 IQC 结果的显著变化可能会导致 MU 的显著差异。此外,在收集 MU 估计的 IQC 数据时,应分别处理 IQC 材料批次。

结论

IQC 数据的批变化是影响 MU 估计的关键因素,在 MU 估计过程中不应忽视。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80c0/9277045/a7a44a9d4497/alm-42-6-630-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80c0/9277045/d4bf0c62bec9/alm-42-6-630-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80c0/9277045/c8a3b103b194/alm-42-6-630-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80c0/9277045/d550a51481de/alm-42-6-630-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80c0/9277045/a7a44a9d4497/alm-42-6-630-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80c0/9277045/d4bf0c62bec9/alm-42-6-630-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80c0/9277045/c8a3b103b194/alm-42-6-630-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80c0/9277045/d550a51481de/alm-42-6-630-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80c0/9277045/a7a44a9d4497/alm-42-6-630-f4.jpg

相似文献

1
Practical Considerations for Clinical Laboratories in Top-down Approach for Assessing the Measurement Uncertainty of Clinical Chemistry Analytes.用于评估临床化学分析物测量不确定度的自上而下方法的临床实验室实用注意事项。
Ann Lab Med. 2022 Nov 1;42(6):630-637. doi: 10.3343/alm.2022.42.6.630.
2
Disregarded Measurement Uncertainty Contributions and Their Magnitude in Measuring Plasma Glucose.在测量血浆葡萄糖时忽略测量不确定度的贡献及其大小。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2022 Jan;16(1):161-167. doi: 10.1177/1932296820966353. Epub 2020 Nov 20.
3
Evaluation of Coefficients of Variation for Clinical Chemistry Tests Based on Internal Quality Control Data Across 5,425 Laboratories in China From 2013 to 2022.基于 2013 年至 2022 年中国 5425 家实验室内部质量控制数据评估临床化学检验的变异系数。
Ann Lab Med. 2024 May 1;44(3):245-252. doi: 10.3343/alm.2023.0236. Epub 2023 Nov 28.
4
Failure of internal quality control in detecting significant reagent lot shift in serum creatinine measurement.血清肌酐测量中内部质量控制未能检测到显著试剂批次偏移的故障。
J Clin Lab Anal. 2019 Nov;33(9):e22991. doi: 10.1002/jcla.22991. Epub 2019 Aug 2.
5
An approach for estimating measurement uncertainty in medical laboratories using data from long-term quality control and external quality assessment schemes.一种利用长期质量控制和外部质量评估计划的数据来估算医学实验室测量不确定度的方法。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2017 Oct 26;55(11):1696-1701. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2016-0896.
6
Combining Nordtest method and bootstrap resampling for measurement uncertainty estimation of hematology analytes in a medical laboratory.结合Nordtest方法和自助重采样用于医学实验室血液学分析物测量不确定度的评估。
Clin Biochem. 2017 Dec;50(18):1067-1072. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2017.09.008. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
7
Applicability of the long-term uncertainty in measurement (LTUM) method for analytical performance assessment in clinical cytometry laboratories.长期测量不确定度(LTUM)方法在临床细胞分析实验室分析性能评估中的适用性。
Cytometry B Clin Cytom. 2022 May;102(3):254-260. doi: 10.1002/cyto.b.22050. Epub 2021 Dec 16.
8
Evaluation of Measurement Uncertainties of Immunoassays Analytes According to Biological Variation Databases.根据生物学变异数据库评估免疫分析物测量不确定度。
Clin Lab. 2022 Sep 1;68(9). doi: 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2021.210906.
9
Statistical validation of reagent lot change in the clinical chemistry laboratory can confer insights on good clinical laboratory practice.临床化学实验室中试剂批次变更的统计验证可为良好临床实验室规范提供见解。
Ann Clin Biochem. 2014 Nov;51(Pt 6):688-94. doi: 10.1177/0004563214520749. Epub 2014 Feb 4.
10
Measurement uncertainty in clinical chemistry: ISO 20914 versus nordtest or intermediate precision versus bias.临床化学中的测量不确定度:ISO 20914 与 nordtest 或中间精密度与偏差。
Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2024 May;84(3):147-153. doi: 10.1080/00365513.2024.2338738. Epub 2024 May 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Are Your Laboratory Data Reproducible? The Critical Role of Imprecision from Replicate Measurements to Clinical Decision-making.你的实验室数据可重复吗?从重复测量的不精密度到临床决策的关键作用。
Ann Lab Med. 2025 May 1;45(3):259-271. doi: 10.3343/alm.2024.0569. Epub 2025 Mar 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Influence of reagent lots and multiple measuring systems on estimating the coefficient of variation from quality control data; implications for uncertainty estimation and interpretation of QC results.试剂批次和多个测量系统对从质量控制数据估算变异系数的影响;对不确定度估计和 QC 结果解释的影响。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020 Oct 25;58(11):1829-1835. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2020-0320.
2
The utility of measurement uncertainty in medical laboratories.测量不确定度在医学实验室中的应用。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020 Mar 3;58(9):1407-1413. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2019-1336. Print 2020 Aug 27.
3
Descriptive statistics and normality tests for statistical data.
统计数据的描述性统计和正态性检验。
Ann Card Anaesth. 2019 Jan-Mar;22(1):67-72. doi: 10.4103/aca.ACA_157_18.
4
Lot-to-Lot Variation.批次间差异
Clin Biochem Rev. 2018 May;39(2):51-60.
5
A simple transformation independent method for outlier definition.一种简单的转换无关的异常值定义方法。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2018 Aug 28;56(9):1524-1532. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2018-0025.
6
Deriving proper measurement uncertainty from Internal Quality Control data: An impossible mission?从内部质量控制数据中得出适当的测量不确定度:一项不可能完成的任务?
Clin Biochem. 2018 Jul;57:37-40. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2018.03.019. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
7
Measurement uncertainty: Friend or foe?测量不确定度:朋友还是敌人?
Clin Biochem. 2018 Jul;57:3-6. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2018.01.025. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
8
Minimum requirements for the estimation of measurement uncertainty: Recommendations of the joint Working group for uncertainty of measurement of the CSMBLM and CCMB.最小测量不确定度估计要求:CSMBLM 和 CCMB 测量不确定度联合工作组的建议。
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2017 Oct 15;27(3):030502. doi: 10.11613/BM.2017.030502.
9
Role and Responsibilities of Laboratory Medicine Specialists in the Verification OF Metrological Traceability of Medical Diagnostics.检验医学专家在医学诊断计量溯源性验证中的作用与职责
J Med Biochem. 2015 Jul;34(3):282-287. doi: 10.1515/jomb-2015-0004. Epub 2015 Jul 14.
10
Performance criteria for combined uncertainty budget in the implementation of metrological traceability.计量溯源实施中组合不确定度预算的性能标准。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2015 May;53(6):905-12. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2014-1240.