• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根据 VARC-3,在一年的随访中,二叶式主动脉瓣狭窄患者经 TAVI 治疗后的生物瓣功能障碍和失败。

Bioprosthetic valve dysfunction and failure after TAVI in bicuspid aortic valve stenosis during one-year follow-up according to VARC-3.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Pulmonology and Vascular Medicine, Heinrich Heine University, Medical Faculty, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.

CARID (Cardiovascular Research Institute Düsseldorf), Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.

出版信息

Clin Res Cardiol. 2022 Dec;111(12):1358-1366. doi: 10.1007/s00392-022-02052-9. Epub 2022 Jun 29.

DOI:10.1007/s00392-022-02052-9
PMID:35767098
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9681687/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) stenosis has become more frequent in the last years. This may pose challenges for long-time valve durability. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the prevalence of bioprosthetic valve dysfunction (BVD) with the newest-generation devices in BAV stenosis up to one-year follow-up (FU).

METHODS

The primary endpoint was defined as the prevalence of BVD during the first procedural year according to Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC)-3 criteria. Secondary endpoints were defined as failure in device success and clinical endpoints according to VARC-3.

RESULTS

A total of 107 patients were included. Of these, 34 subjects (31.8%) met the criteria for BVD during a mean FU of 263 ± 180 days, of which 20.2% were already documented after thirty days. Device success after one year was lower in the + BVD cohort (57.6% vs. 98.7%, p < 0.0001*). The rates of structural valve deterioration were 6.5%, non-structural valve deterioration (NSVD) 17.8%, subclinical leaflet thickening 10.3%, and endocarditis 0.9%. NSVD was foremost triggered by patient prosthesis mismatch in balloon-expandable valves. Hemodynamic valve deterioration stage 1 and 2 was confirmed in 16.8% of + BVD patients, while stage 1 and 3 bioprosthetic valve failure occurred in 1.9%. There was no impact of BVD on mortality.

CONCLUSION

There is critical evidence of early BVD after TAVI in BAV during one-year FU in one-third of patients, also lowering device success. The most frequently observed bioprosthetic valve dysfunction was NSVD due to patient prosthesis mismatch following TAVI with a balloon-expandable valve.

摘要

背景

近年来,经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)在二叶式主动脉瓣(BAV)狭窄中的应用越来越频繁。这可能对长期瓣膜耐久性构成挑战。因此,我们旨在评估在最新一代器械治疗 BAV 狭窄的患者中,在一年随访(FU)期间生物瓣功能障碍(BVD)的发生率。

方法

主要终点定义为根据 Valve Academic Research Consortium(VARC)-3 标准,在第一个程序年内 BVD 的发生率。次要终点定义为根据 VARC-3 定义的器械成功和临床终点的失败。

结果

共纳入 107 例患者。其中,34 例(31.8%)在平均 263±180 天的 FU 期间符合 BVD 标准,其中 20.2%在 30 天后已被记录。在一年时,BVD 阳性组的器械成功率较低(57.6% vs. 98.7%,p<0.0001*)。结构性瓣膜恶化的发生率为 6.5%,非结构性瓣膜恶化(NSVD)为 17.8%,亚临床瓣叶增厚为 10.3%,心内膜炎为 0.9%。NSVD 主要由球囊扩张瓣的患者-假体不匹配触发。在 16.8%的 BVD 阳性患者中证实存在血流动力学瓣膜恶化 1 期和 2 期,而 1.9%的患者出现 1 期和 3 期生物瓣故障。BVD 对死亡率无影响。

结论

在 1 年 FU 期间,三分之一的患者在 BAV 中接受 TAVI 后存在早期 BVD,这也降低了器械成功率。最常观察到的生物瓣功能障碍是 NSVD,这是由于 TAVI 后球囊扩张瓣的患者-假体不匹配导致。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6839/9681687/01bcb582fdaa/392_2022_2052_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6839/9681687/778e0d3cd3c4/392_2022_2052_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6839/9681687/01bcb582fdaa/392_2022_2052_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6839/9681687/778e0d3cd3c4/392_2022_2052_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6839/9681687/01bcb582fdaa/392_2022_2052_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Bioprosthetic valve dysfunction and failure after TAVI in bicuspid aortic valve stenosis during one-year follow-up according to VARC-3.根据 VARC-3,在一年的随访中,二叶式主动脉瓣狭窄患者经 TAVI 治疗后的生物瓣功能障碍和失败。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2022 Dec;111(12):1358-1366. doi: 10.1007/s00392-022-02052-9. Epub 2022 Jun 29.
2
Mid-term outcomes and hemodynamic performance of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in bicuspid aortic valve stenosis: Insights from the bicuSpid TAvi duraBILITY (STABILITY) registry.经导管主动脉瓣植入术治疗二叶式主动脉瓣狭窄的中期结果和血流动力学表现:来自 bicuSpid TAvi duraBILITY(STABILITY)注册研究的见解。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Nov;102(6):1132-1139. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30813. Epub 2023 Sep 5.
3
Incidence and mechanisms of bioprosthetic dysfunction after transcatheter implantation of a mechanically-expandable heart valve.经导管植入机械可扩张心脏瓣膜后生物假体功能障碍的发生率和机制。
EuroIntervention. 2022 Oct 21;18(9):769-776. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00193.
4
Safety and efficacy of minimalist transcatheter aortic valve implantation using a new-generation balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valve in bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valves.使用新一代球囊扩张式经导管心脏瓣膜在二叶式和三叶式主动脉瓣中进行微创经导管主动脉瓣植入的安全性和有效性。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2021 Dec;110(12):1993-2006. doi: 10.1007/s00392-021-01935-7. Epub 2021 Sep 9.
5
Latest-iteration balloon- and self-expandable transcatheter valves for severe bicuspid aortic stenosis: the TRITON study.最新一代球囊扩张式和自膨式经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗严重二叶式主动脉瓣狭窄:TRITON 研究。
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2023 Nov;76(11):872-880. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2023.03.002. Epub 2023 Mar 9.
6
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the Evolut platform for bicuspid aortic valve stenosis: the international, multicentre, prospective BIVOLUTX registry.经导管主动脉瓣植入术治疗二叶式主动脉瓣狭窄的 Evolut 平台:国际多中心前瞻性 BIVOLUTX 注册研究。
EuroIntervention. 2023 Aug 21;19(6):502-511. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00021.
7
Incidence, causes, correlates, and outcome of bioprosthetic valve dysfunction and failure following transcatheter aortic valve implantation.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后生物瓣功能障碍和失败的发生率、原因、相关性和结局。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2023 May 31;24(6):796-806. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeac188.
8
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in bicuspid aortic valve disease.经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗二叶式主动脉瓣疾病。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Dec 9;64(22):2330-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.039. Epub 2014 Dec 1.
9
Aortic valve anatomy and outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation in bicuspid aortic valves.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后二叶式主动脉瓣的主动脉瓣解剖结构和结果。
Int J Cardiol. 2018 Sep 1;266:56-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.01.018.
10
Annular size and interaction with trans-catheter aortic valves for treatment of severe bicuspid aortic valve stenosis: Insights from the BEAT registry.环大小及与经导管主动脉瓣在治疗重度二叶式主动脉瓣狭窄中的相互作用:来自BEAT注册研究的见解
Int J Cardiol. 2022 Feb 15;349:31-38. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2021.11.055. Epub 2021 Nov 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Evidence of bioprosthetic valve dysfunction during three-year follow-up following TAVR.经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)后三年随访期间生物瓣膜功能障碍的证据。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2025 May 12. doi: 10.1007/s00392-025-02630-7.
2
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with significant septal hypertrophy.严重室间隔肥厚患者的经导管主动脉瓣植入术。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2025 Mar;114(3):332-340. doi: 10.1007/s00392-024-02432-3. Epub 2024 Mar 11.
3
One-Year Outcomes after Myval Implantation in Patients with Bicuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis-A Multicentre Real-World Experience.

本文引用的文献

1
Association Between Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Bicuspid vs Tricuspid Aortic Stenosis and Mortality or Stroke Among Patients at Low Surgical Risk.经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗二叶式主动脉瓣 vs 三叶式主动脉瓣狭窄与低手术风险患者的死亡率或卒中的关系。
JAMA. 2021 Sep 21;326(11):1034-1044. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.13346.
2
Valve Academic Research Consortium 3: Updated Endpoint Definitions for Aortic Valve Clinical Research.瓣膜学术研究联合会 3:主动脉瓣临床研究更新终点定义。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Jun 1;77(21):2717-2746. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.02.038. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
3
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-risk Patients With Bicuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis.
二尖瓣主动脉瓣狭窄患者植入Myval后的一年结局——一项多中心真实世界经验
J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 20;12(6):2398. doi: 10.3390/jcm12062398.
经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗二叶式主动脉瓣狭窄的低危患者。
JAMA Cardiol. 2021 Jan 1;6(1):50-57. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.4738.
4
Bicuspid Aortic Valve Morphology and Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.二叶式主动脉瓣形态与经导管主动脉瓣置换术后结局。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Sep 1;76(9):1018-1030. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.07.005.
5
Comparison of infective endocarditis risk between balloon and self-expandable valves following transcatheter aortic valve replacement: systematic review and meta-analysis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后球囊扩张瓣与自膨式瓣的感染性心内膜炎风险比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2021 Jul;36(3):363-374. doi: 10.1007/s12928-020-00675-1. Epub 2020 May 24.
6
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients With Symptomatic Severe Bicuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗有症状的低危二叶式主动脉瓣重度狭窄患者。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 May 11;13(9):1019-1027. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.02.008. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
7
Bicuspid aortic valve sizing for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Development and validation of an algorithm based on multi-slice computed tomography.经导管主动脉瓣植入术中的二叶式主动脉瓣尺寸测量:基于多排 CT 的算法的开发和验证。
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2020 Sep-Oct;14(5):452-461. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2020.01.007. Epub 2020 Jan 25.
8
Association Between Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Bicuspid vs Tricuspid Aortic Stenosis and Mortality or Stroke.经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗二叶式主动脉瓣与三叶式主动脉瓣狭窄与死亡率或卒中性事件的相关性。
JAMA. 2019 Jun 11;321(22):2193-2202. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.7108.
9
Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement with a Balloon-Expandable Valve in Low-Risk Patients.经皮球囊扩张式主动脉瓣置换术治疗低危患者。
N Engl J Med. 2019 May 2;380(18):1695-1705. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1814052. Epub 2019 Mar 16.
10
Bicuspid Aortic Valve Anatomy and Relationship With Devices: The BAVARD Multicenter Registry.二叶式主动脉瓣解剖结构与器械的关系:BAVARD 多中心注册研究。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Jan;12(1):e007107. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007107.