• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

E-PASS评分预测腹腔镜肾切除术术后并发症的可行性。

Feasibility of E-PASS score to predict postoperative complications in laparoscopic nephrectomy.

作者信息

Kasap Yusuf, Senel Samet, Tastemur Sedat, Olcucuoglu Erkan

机构信息

Department of Urology, Ankara City Hospital, Üniversiteler Mahallesi, 1604. Cadde No: 9 Çankaya, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Int Urol Nephrol. 2022 Sep;54(9):2149-2156. doi: 10.1007/s11255-022-03269-3. Epub 2022 Jun 29.

DOI:10.1007/s11255-022-03269-3
PMID:35767201
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the usefulness of E-PASS score to predict postoperative complications after laparoscopic nephrectomy.

METHODS

Between 2008 and 2020, 424 patients (179 patients: simple nephrectomy, 158 patients: radical nephrectomy, 87 patients: donor nephrectomy) who underwent laparoscopic nephrectomy in our clinic, were included in the study. Patient groups separated according to the presence of postoperative complications were compared retrospectively regarding demographic, clinical, intraoperative, and postoperative data, comorbidities, and E-PASS scores (PRS, SSS, and CRS). The relationship between postoperative complications and E-PASS scores was examined.

RESULTS

Postoperative complications occurred in 43 (10.1%) of the patients. Age, previous abdominal/retroperitoneal surgery, radical nephrectomy rate of surgeries, operation time, amount of bleeding, need for blood transfusion, rate of conversion from laparoscopic surgery to open surgery, hospitalization time, E-PASS PRS, SSS, and CRS were statistically significantly higher in the group with postoperative complications. The cutoff value of the E-PASS CRS was - 0.2996 to predict the development of postoperative complications (AUC = 0.706; 95% CI 0.629-0.783; p < 0.001). According to multivariate analysis, presence of previous abdominal/retroperitoneal surgery (OR 2.977; 95% CI 1.502-5.899; p = 0.002), laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (OR 2.518; 95% CI 1.224-5.179; p = 0.012), conversion from laparoscopic surgery to open surgery (OR 4.869; 95% CI 1.046-22.669; p = 0.044) and E-PASS CRS > - 0.2996 (OR 2.816; 95% CI 1.321-6.004; p = 0.007) were found to be independent risk factors predicting postoperative complications.

CONCLUSION

The E-PASS scoring system is an effective and convenient system for predicting postoperative complications after laparoscopic nephrectomy.

摘要

目的

评估E-PASS评分对预测腹腔镜肾切除术后并发症的有效性。

方法

2008年至2020年间,我院424例行腹腔镜肾切除术的患者(179例:单纯肾切除术,158例:根治性肾切除术,87例:供体肾切除术)纳入本研究。根据术后并发症的有无将患者分组,对人口统计学、临床、术中及术后数据、合并症和E-PASS评分(PRS、SSS和CRS)进行回顾性比较。研究术后并发症与E-PASS评分之间的关系。

结果

43例(10.1%)患者发生术后并发症。术后并发症组患者的年龄、既往腹部/腹膜后手术史、根治性肾切除术比例、手术时间、出血量、输血需求、腹腔镜手术转为开放手术的比例、住院时间、E-PASS PRS、SSS和CRS在统计学上显著更高。E-PASS CRS预测术后并发症发生的截断值为-0.2996(AUC = 0.706;95% CI 0.629 - 0.783;p < 0.001)。多因素分析显示,既往腹部/腹膜后手术史(OR 2.977;95% CI 1.502 - 5.899;p = 0.002)、腹腔镜根治性肾切除术(OR 2.518;95% CI 1.224 - 5.179;p = 0.012)、腹腔镜手术转为开放手术(OR 4.869;95% CI 1.046 - 22.669;p = 0.044)以及E-PASS CRS > -0.2996(OR 2.816;95% CI 1.321 - 6.004;p = 0.007)是预测术后并发症的独立危险因素。

结论

E-PASS评分系统是预测腹腔镜肾切除术后并发症的有效且便捷的系统。

相似文献

1
Feasibility of E-PASS score to predict postoperative complications in laparoscopic nephrectomy.E-PASS评分预测腹腔镜肾切除术术后并发症的可行性。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2022 Sep;54(9):2149-2156. doi: 10.1007/s11255-022-03269-3. Epub 2022 Jun 29.
2
Prediction of complications after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: feasibility of E‑PASS score.腹腔镜部分肾切除术后并发症的预测:E-PASS评分的可行性
Int Urol Nephrol. 2025 Mar;57(3):701-708. doi: 10.1007/s11255-024-04246-8. Epub 2024 Oct 20.
3
Comparative Study of Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Versus Open Ipsilateral Nephrectomy After Percutaneous Nephrostomy: A Multicenter Analysis.经皮肾造瘘术后腹膜后腹腔镜与开放性同侧肾切除术的比较研究:一项多中心分析
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2020 May;30(5):520-524. doi: 10.1089/lap.2019.0746. Epub 2020 Feb 6.
4
Estimation of physiologic ability and surgical stress (E-PASS) scoring system could provide preoperative advice on whether to undergo laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer patients with a high physiological risk.生理能力与手术应激评估(E-PASS)评分系统可为生理风险高的结直肠癌患者是否进行腹腔镜手术提供术前建议。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Aug;96(33):e7772. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000007772.
5
Estimation of Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress (E-PASS) predicts postoperative complications after radical cystectomy.生理能力和手术应激估计(E-PASS)预测根治性膀胱切除术后的术后并发症。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2024 Dec;56(12):3743-3749. doi: 10.1007/s11255-024-04134-1. Epub 2024 Jun 26.
6
E-PASS score as a useful predictor of postoperative complications and mortality after colorectal surgery in elderly patients.电子患者评估系统(E-PASS)评分可作为老年患者结直肠手术后并发症和死亡率的有效预测指标。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016 Feb;31(2):217-25. doi: 10.1007/s00384-015-2456-7. Epub 2015 Nov 26.
7
The Mayo Adhesive Probability score can help predict intra- and postoperative complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic donor nephrectomy.梅奥粘连可能性评分可帮助预测行腹腔镜供肾切术患者的围术期并发症。
World J Urol. 2021 Jul;39(7):2775-2781. doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03513-4. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
8
Evaluation of different scoring systems in the prediction of complications, morbidity, and mortality after laparoscopic radical gastrectomy.评价不同评分系统在预测腹腔镜根治性胃切除术后并发症、发病率和死亡率中的作用。
World J Surg Oncol. 2023 Dec 18;21(1):388. doi: 10.1186/s12957-023-03282-5.
9
The Estimation of Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress (E-PASS) model as a predictor of postoperative complications and mortality after digestive surgeries: a meta-analysis and systematic review.预测消化系统手术后并发症和死亡率的生理能力和手术应激(E-PASS)模型:荟萃分析和系统评价。
Ann Palliat Med. 2021 Aug;10(8):8672-8683. doi: 10.21037/apm-21-941. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
10
Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy Versus Radical Nephrectomy for Clinical T1 Renal Hilar Tumor: Comparison of Perioperative Characteristics and Short-Term Functional and Oncologic Outcomes.后腹腔镜下肾部分切除术与根治性肾切除术治疗临床T1期肾门肿瘤:围手术期特征及短期功能和肿瘤学结局比较
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Oct;28(10):1183-1187. doi: 10.1089/lap.2018.0064. Epub 2018 Apr 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors Leading to Conversion from Laparoscopy to Open Surgery in Partial Nephrectomy: a Case Series and Literature Review.部分肾切除术中导致腹腔镜手术转为开放手术的因素:病例系列研究与文献综述
Maedica (Bucur). 2025 Jun;20(2):228-234. doi: 10.26574/maedica.2025.20.2.228.
2
The predictive utility of the E-PASS score for postoperative complications in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a retrospective cohort study.E-PASS评分对机器人辅助部分肾切除术术后并发症的预测效用:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Urol. 2025 Aug 9;25(1):197. doi: 10.1186/s12894-025-01899-0.
3
Estimation of physiologic ability and surgical stress (E-PASS) predicts postoperative complications after adrenalectomy.
生理能力与手术应激评估(E-PASS)可预测肾上腺切除术后的并发症。
Updates Surg. 2025 Jun;77(3):915-924. doi: 10.1007/s13304-025-02145-w. Epub 2025 Mar 3.
4
Evaluating postoperative complications in standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones larger than 2 cm: a retrospective study utilizing the E-PASS scoring system.评估标准经皮肾镜取石术治疗直径大于2厘米肾结石的术后并发症:一项采用E-PASS评分系统的回顾性研究
Urolithiasis. 2025 Jan 7;53(1):20. doi: 10.1007/s00240-024-01689-7.
5
Prediction of complications after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: feasibility of E‑PASS score.腹腔镜部分肾切除术后并发症的预测:E-PASS评分的可行性
Int Urol Nephrol. 2025 Mar;57(3):701-708. doi: 10.1007/s11255-024-04246-8. Epub 2024 Oct 20.
6
Efficiency of the estimation of physiologic ability and surgical stress (E-PASS) score in predicting postoperative complications after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.预测机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后术后并发症的生理能力和手术应激估计(E-PASS)评分的效率。
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2024 Jun;30(6):423-429. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2024.36332.
7
Estimation of Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress scoring system for predicting complications following abdominal surgery: A meta-analysis spanning 2004 to 2022.用于预测腹部手术后并发症的生理能力和手术应激评分系统评估:一项涵盖2004年至2022年的荟萃分析。
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2024 Jan 27;16(1):215-227. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i1.215.