• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后术后并发症的生理能力和手术应激估计(E-PASS)评分的效率。

Efficiency of the estimation of physiologic ability and surgical stress (E-PASS) score in predicting postoperative complications after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, Ankara-Türkiye.

Department of Urology, Sirnak State Hospital, Sirnak-Türkiye.

出版信息

Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2024 Jun;30(6):423-429. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2024.36332.

DOI:10.14744/tjtes.2024.36332
PMID:38863296
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11230049/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy (RARP) is increasingly becoming the standard surgical treatment for prostate cancer. While some risk factors for postoperative complications of RARP have been identified, no scoring model that incorporates both preoperative physical status of the patient and intraoperative risk factors has been developed. The Estimation of Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress (E-PASS) score was initially described to predict postoperative complications after gastrointestinal surgical procedures. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of the E-PASS score in predicting postoperative complications of RARP.

METHODS

A retrospective evaluation was conducted on 204 patients who underwent RARP between 2019 and 2022. Demographic data, parameters indicating patients' preoperative physical condition, and intraoperative risk factors were analyzed. The E-PASS score and subscores were calculated for each patient.

RESULTS

Of the patients, 164 (80.4%) were discharged without any postoperative complications (Group 1), and 40 (19.6%) experienced various degrees of complications (Group 2). Patients in Group 2 had higher rates of previous abdominal surgery, elevated Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance scores, longer surgical durations, and higher E-PASS scores. To assess the effectiveness of the Comprehensive Risk Score (CRS) as a predictive factor for postoperative complications, a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed with a 95% confidence interval (CI), and a cut-off value was established. The cut-off value for CRS was determined to be -0.0345 (area under the curve [AUC]=0.783, CI: 0.713-0.853; p<0.001). Patients with a CRS higher than the cut-off value had a 16.4 times higher rate of postoperative complications after RARP (95% CI: 5.58-48.5).

CONCLUSION

The E-PASS scoring model successfully predicts postoperative complications in patients undergoing RARP by using preoperative data about the physical status of the patient and surgical risk factors. The E-PASS score and its subscores could be utilized as objective criteria to determine the risk of postoperative complications before and immediately after surgery.

摘要

背景

机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)日益成为前列腺癌的标准手术治疗方法。虽然已经确定了 RARP 术后并发症的一些危险因素,但尚未开发出一种同时包含患者术前身体状况和术中危险因素的评分模型。生理能力和手术应激估计(E-PASS)评分最初是为预测胃肠道手术后的术后并发症而描述的。本研究旨在评估 E-PASS 评分预测 RARP 术后并发症的有效性。

方法

对 2019 年至 2022 年间接受 RARP 的 204 例患者进行回顾性评估。分析了患者的人口统计学数据、表示患者术前身体状况的参数以及术中危险因素。计算每位患者的 E-PASS 评分和子评分。

结果

204 例患者中,164 例(80.4%)术后无任何并发症出院(第 1 组),40 例(19.6%)出现不同程度的并发症(第 2 组)。第 2 组患者既往腹部手术比例较高,东部合作肿瘤学组(ECOG)表现评分升高,手术时间较长,E-PASS 评分较高。为评估综合风险评分(CRS)作为术后并发症预测因素的有效性,构建了具有 95%置信区间(CI)的接收者操作特征(ROC)曲线,并建立了截断值。CRS 的截断值为-0.0345(曲线下面积 [AUC]=0.783,CI:0.713-0.853;p<0.001)。CRS 高于截断值的患者 RARP 术后并发症发生率高 16.4 倍(95%CI:5.58-48.5)。

结论

E-PASS 评分模型通过使用患者术前身体状况和手术危险因素的术前数据成功预测 RARP 术后并发症。E-PASS 评分及其子评分可作为手术前后确定术后并发症风险的客观标准。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0bd/11230049/3d67fc5b881d/TJTES-30-423-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0bd/11230049/3d67fc5b881d/TJTES-30-423-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0bd/11230049/3d67fc5b881d/TJTES-30-423-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Efficiency of the estimation of physiologic ability and surgical stress (E-PASS) score in predicting postoperative complications after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.预测机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后术后并发症的生理能力和手术应激估计(E-PASS)评分的效率。
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2024 Jun;30(6):423-429. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2024.36332.
2
A prediction model relating the extent of intraoperative fascia preservation to erectile dysfunction after nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.一种与保留术中筋膜范围相关的预测模型,用于预测神经保留机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后勃起功能障碍。
J Robot Surg. 2019 Jun;13(3):455-462. doi: 10.1007/s11701-018-0867-5. Epub 2018 Sep 3.
3
Intravesical prostatic protrusion may affect early postoperative continence undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.膀胱内前列腺突出可能会影响机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后早期的控尿功能。
BMC Urol. 2020 Oct 21;20(1):164. doi: 10.1186/s12894-020-00740-0.
4
Total anatomical reconstruction during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: focus on urinary continence recovery and related complications after 1000 procedures.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的全解剖重建:关注 1000 例手术后尿控恢复和相关并发症。
BJU Int. 2019 Sep;124(3):477-486. doi: 10.1111/bju.14716. Epub 2019 Mar 15.
5
Perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy compared with open radical prostatectomy: results from the nationwide inpatient sample.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术与开放性根治性前列腺切除术的围手术期结局比较:来自全国住院患者样本的结果。
Eur Urol. 2012 Apr;61(4):679-85. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.12.027. Epub 2011 Dec 22.
6
Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy for the treatment of localised prostate cancer.腹腔镜及机器人辅助与开放根治性前列腺切除术治疗局限性前列腺癌的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 12;9(9):CD009625. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009625.pub2.
7
Body mass index is an independent predictor of Clavien-Dindo grade 3 complications in patients undergoing robot assisted radical prostatectomy with extensive pelvic lymph node dissection.体重指数是机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术伴广泛盆腔淋巴结清扫术患者发生 Clavien-Dindo 3 级并发症的独立预测因子。
J Robot Surg. 2019 Feb;13(1):83-89. doi: 10.1007/s11701-018-0824-3. Epub 2018 May 8.
8
A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial Examining the Impact of the Retzius-sparing Approach on Early Urinary Continence Recovery After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy.一项实用随机对照试验研究了保留耻骨前列腺韧带在机器人辅助前列腺根治性切除术后早期尿控恢复中的影响。
Eur Urol. 2017 Nov;72(5):677-685. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.04.029. Epub 2017 May 6.
9
Modified frailty index associated with Clavien-Dindo IV complications in robot-assisted radical prostatectomies: A retrospective study.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术中与Clavien-Dindo IV级并发症相关的改良衰弱指数:一项回顾性研究
Urol Oncol. 2017 Jun;35(6):425-431. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.01.005. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
10
Comparison of Acute and Chronic Surgical Complications Following Robot-Assisted, Laparoscopic, and Traditional Open Radical Prostatectomy Among Men in Taiwan.台湾男性机器人辅助、腹腔镜及传统开放根治性前列腺切除术后急性和慢性手术并发症的比较
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Aug 2;4(8):e2120156. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.20156.

引用本文的文献

1
The predictive utility of the E-PASS score for postoperative complications in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a retrospective cohort study.E-PASS评分对机器人辅助部分肾切除术术后并发症的预测效用:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Urol. 2025 Aug 9;25(1):197. doi: 10.1186/s12894-025-01899-0.
2
Comparison of different scoring systems for prediction of postoperative complications after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后不同预测术后并发症评分系统的比较。
J Robot Surg. 2025 Jun 5;19(1):272. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02406-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Feasibility of E-PASS score to predict postoperative complications in laparoscopic nephrectomy.E-PASS评分预测腹腔镜肾切除术术后并发症的可行性。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2022 Sep;54(9):2149-2156. doi: 10.1007/s11255-022-03269-3. Epub 2022 Jun 29.
2
E-PASS scoring system serves as a predictor of short- and long-term outcomes in gastric cancer surgery.E-PASS评分系统可作为胃癌手术短期和长期预后的预测指标。
Surg Today. 2022 Jun;52(6):914-922. doi: 10.1007/s00595-021-02394-3. Epub 2021 Oct 25.
3
Patterns of adoption of robotic radical prostatectomy in the United States and England.
美国和英国采用机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的模式。
Health Serv Res. 2021 Dec;56 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):1441-1461. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13706. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
4
E-PASS Scoring System May Be Useful for Prediction of Postoperative Complications in Super Elderly Colorectal Cancer Surgery Patients.电子通行证评分系统可能有助于预测超高龄结直肠癌手术患者的术后并发症。
J Anus Rectum Colon. 2020 Jul 30;4(3):137-144. doi: 10.23922/jarc.2020-017. eCollection 2020.
5
Comparison of retropubic, laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy: who is the winner?经耻骨后、腹腔镜和机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的比较:谁是赢家?
World J Urol. 2018 Apr;36(4):609-621. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2174-1. Epub 2018 Jan 23.
6
Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Is More Beneficial for Prostate Cancer Patients: A System Review and Meta-Analysis.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术对前列腺癌患者更有益:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Med Sci Monit. 2018 Jan 14;24:272-287. doi: 10.12659/msm.907092.
7
Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy for the treatment of localised prostate cancer.腹腔镜及机器人辅助与开放根治性前列腺切除术治疗局限性前列腺癌的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 12;9(9):CD009625. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009625.pub2.
8
Abdominal adhesions: A practical review of an often overlooked entity.腹部粘连:对一个常被忽视的病症的实用综述
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2017 Jan 31;15:9-13. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2017.01.021. eCollection 2017 Mar.
9
E-PASS score as a useful predictor of postoperative complications and mortality after colorectal surgery in elderly patients.电子患者评估系统(E-PASS)评分可作为老年患者结直肠手术后并发症和死亡率的有效预测指标。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016 Feb;31(2):217-25. doi: 10.1007/s00384-015-2456-7. Epub 2015 Nov 26.
10
Validity of E-PASS System for Postoperative Morbidity of Spinal Surgery.电子患者评估与手术评分系统(E-PASS)对脊柱手术术后发病率评估的有效性
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2015 Dec;28(10):E595-600. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000056.