Suh Jee Won, Lee Jin Gu, Park Moo Suk, Kim Song Yee, Jeong Su Jin, Paik Hyo Chae
Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yongin, Korea.
Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Korean J Transplant. 2020 Sep 30;34(3):185-192. doi: 10.4285/kjt.2020.34.3.185.
Organ donor shortage remains as one of the limiting factors for lung transplantation. Given the increase in waiting time, preoperative condition has worsened and affects surgical outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the immediate postoperative and long-term outcomes of lung transplantation in extended-criteria donor (ECD) lungs compared with standard-criteria donor (SCD) lungs.
A total of 246 patients who had undergone double-lung transplantation during the study period were enrolled. SCD was defined based on the following characteristics age <55 years, <20 pack-years smoking history, and PaO/fraction of O ratio >300 mmHg. Organ donors who do not fulfill these criteria were classified as ECD. Pre- and postoperative data for outcomes and survival data were analyzed.
ECD showed significant association with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation weaning in the operating room (hazard ratio [HR], 0.531; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.291-0.970; P=0.039) considering recipient's age and status at operation. The ECD group showed comparable survival rate with the SCD group (HR, 1.413; 95% CI, 0.885-2.255; P=0.148), with adjustment of other factors. However, when the recipient had Korean Network for Organ Sharing (KONOS) status 0 at the time of transplantation (HR, 1.662; 95% CI, 1.025-2.568; P=0.039), G3 primary graft dysfunction at 72 hours after surgery (HR, 2.508; 95% CI, 1.416-4.440; P=0.002) was a risk factor that decreased survival.
The outcome of ECD is not inferior to that of SCD. Therefore, ECD lung should be considered a potential donor organ following active donor management rather than a contraindication of transplantation in highly selected recipients.
器官供体短缺仍然是肺移植的限制因素之一。鉴于等待时间的增加,术前状况恶化并影响手术结果。本研究旨在评估与标准标准供体(SCD)肺相比,扩大标准供体(ECD)肺肺移植的术后即刻和长期结果。
共纳入了在研究期间接受双肺移植的246例患者。SCD根据以下特征定义:年龄<55岁,吸烟史<20包年,以及PaO/氧分数比>300 mmHg。不符合这些标准的器官供体被归类为ECD。分析了术前和术后的结局数据以及生存数据。
考虑到受者的年龄和手术时的状态,ECD与手术室体外膜肺氧合脱机显著相关(风险比[HR],0.531;95%置信区间[CI],0.291-0.970;P=0.039)。在调整其他因素后,ECD组与SCD组的生存率相当(HR,1.413;95%CI,0.885-2.255;P=0.148)。然而,当受者在移植时具有韩国器官共享网络(KONOS)0级状态时(HR,1.662;95%CI,1.025-2.568;P=0.039),术后72小时发生G3级原发性移植物功能障碍(HR,2.508;95%CI,1.416-4.440;P=0.002)是降低生存率的危险因素。
ECD的结果并不逊于SCD。因此,在积极管理供体后,ECD肺应被视为潜在的供体器官,而不是在经过严格筛选的受者中作为移植的禁忌证。