Suppr超能文献

外侧腓骨应力试验:骨科医生在生物力学模型中施加力的高度变异性。

The Lateral Fibular Stress Test: High Variability of Force Applied by Orthopaedic Surgeons in a Biomechanical Model.

作者信息

Ingall Eitan M, Kaiser Philip, Ashkani-Esfahani Soheil, Zhao John, Kwon John Y

机构信息

Harvard Combined Orthopaedic Residency Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Foot Ankle Orthop. 2022 Jun 24;7(2):24730114221106484. doi: 10.1177/24730114221106484. eCollection 2022 Apr.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The lateral fibular stress test (LFST), also known as the hook or Cotton test, is commonly performed to assess syndesmotic instability intraoperatively. Several studies have used 100 N as the force applied when performing the LFST to detect syndesmotic instability, though no evidence-based requisite force has been described for the test. We hypothesize that surgeons do not apply force uniformly or consistently when performing the LFST and that substantial variation exists. Fundamentally, this could lead to inconsistent diagnosis of syndesmotic instability as surgeons may not be applying the force in a consistent manner.

METHODS

A biomechanical ankle model consisting of an industrial force gauge attached through a SawBones model was fashioned. Orthopaedic attending surgeons and trainees were asked to perform a series of LFSTs and to simulate the force they typically apply intraoperatively. Basic demographic data were collected on each participant.

RESULTS

Thirty-three surgeons participated in the study, including 18 trainees. The median (IQR) force applied during the LFST was 96.42 (71.42-126.33), 87.49 (69.19-117.40), 99.99 (79.91-137.49), for the pooled group, attendings, and trainees respectively. More than half (54.5%) of all trials were less than 100 N (57.8% of surgeons, 51.8% trainees). Intraobserver correlation was excellent within the overall cohort (0.92, < .001), trainees (0.90, < .001), and attendings (0.94, < .001), respectively. Interobserver reliability was fair among the overall cohort (κ =0.28, = .49), and poor between the attendings (κ = 0.11, = .69) and the trainees (κ = 0.05, = .82), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates that the amount of force applied by typical surgeons when performing the LFST test is highly variable. Variable force application when performing the LFST may lead to inconsistent detection of syndesmotic instability, which may portend a poorer outcome.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

In this study, we demonstrate the wide variability in the amount of force used during a lateral fibular stress test. High variability of force application when performing the LFST may lead to inconsistent diagnosis of syndesmotic instability, which may portend a poorer outcome. Our findings suggest the need for further investigation into the technical aspects of syndesmotic testing that will permit more reproducible and valid interrogation of the syndesmosis.

摘要

背景

腓骨外侧应力试验(LFST),也称为钩拉试验或科顿试验,常用于术中评估下胫腓联合不稳。多项研究在进行LFST检测下胫腓联合不稳时采用100 N的施加力,不过该试验尚无基于证据的所需力的描述。我们推测外科医生在进行LFST时施加力的方式并不均匀或一致,且存在显著差异。从根本上说,这可能导致下胫腓联合不稳的诊断不一致,因为外科医生施加力的方式可能不一致。

方法

制作了一个生物力学踝关节模型,该模型由通过SawBones模型连接的工业测力计组成。邀请骨科主治医生和实习医生进行一系列LFST,并模拟他们在术中通常施加的力。收集了每位参与者的基本人口统计学数据。

结果

33名外科医生参与了该研究,其中包括18名实习医生。LFST期间施加力的中位数(四分位间距),总体组为96.42(71.42 - 126.33),主治医生组为87.49(69.19 - 117.40),实习医生组为99.99(79.91 - 137.49)。所有试验中超过一半(54.5%)低于100 N(外科医生为57.8%,实习医生为51.8%)。观察者内相关性在总体队列(0.92,P <.001)、实习医生(0.90,P <.001)和主治医生(0.94,P <.001)中均极佳。观察者间可靠性在总体队列中为中等(κ = 0.28,P =.49),在主治医生(κ = 0.11,P =.69)和实习医生(κ = 0.05,P =.82)之间较差。

结论

我们的研究表明,典型外科医生在进行LFST试验时施加的力的大小高度可变。进行LFST时施加力的变化可能导致下胫腓联合不稳的检测不一致,这可能预示着较差的结果。

临床意义

在本研究中,我们证明了腓骨外侧应力试验期间使用的力的大小存在很大差异。进行LFST时施加力的高度变异性可能导致下胫腓联合不稳诊断不一致,这可能预示着较差的结果。我们的研究结果表明,需要进一步研究下胫腓联合检测的技术方面,以实现对下胫腓联合更可重复和有效的检查。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a48/9234856/412229eb88bf/10.1177_24730114221106484-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验