Dugowson C E, Holland S K
West J Med. 1987 Apr;146(4):494-6.
Birth records of King County, Washington, for 1980 through 1982 were reviewed to study the use of obstetric technology by physician and nonphysician families. The sample of 524 births to physician families was compared with 657 births to nonphysician families randomly selected from upper income census tracts. Though similar in demographic and medical characteristics and pregnancy outcomes, the two groups differed greatly in use of amniocentesis and cesarean section. Physician families used amniocentesis 1.65 times more often than nonphysician families and women physicians were 3 times more likely to have the procedure (relative risk [RR] 3.09). For female physicians 30 to 40 years old, the RR was 5.54. Similarly, physician rates for primary cesarean section were 1.56 times higher and rates for women physicians were twice as high as for controls (RR 2.14). This study suggests higher utilization rates among physicians for some procedures. These findings may foreshadow increases in utilization in the general population.
对华盛顿州金县1980年至1982年的出生记录进行了审查,以研究医生家庭和非医生家庭对产科技术的使用情况。将524例医生家庭出生的样本与从高收入人口普查区随机抽取的657例非医生家庭出生的样本进行了比较。尽管两组在人口统计学和医学特征以及妊娠结局方面相似,但在羊膜穿刺术和剖宫产的使用上差异很大。医生家庭使用羊膜穿刺术的频率是非医生家庭的1.65倍,而女医生进行该手术的可能性是非医生家庭女性的3倍(相对风险[RR] 3.09)。对于30至40岁的女医生,RR为5.54。同样,医生进行初次剖宫产的比例是非医生家庭的1.56倍,女医生的比例是对照组的两倍(RR 2.14)。这项研究表明医生对某些手术的利用率较高。这些发现可能预示着普通人群中手术利用率的增加。