J Couns Psychol. 2022 Jul;69(4):505. doi: 10.1037/cou0000611.
Reports an error in "The "roller coaster ride": A longitudinal investigation of the dynamic relationship between Chinese counseling trainees' self-efficacy and their clients' outcome and the mediating effects of working alliance and session evaluation" by Xu Li, Feihan Li, Chaihua Lin, Shitao Chen and Yuge Han (, Advanced Online Publication, Nov 29, 2021, np). In the article, the scale for the Working Alliance Inventory-Short Revised (WAI-SR) was incorrectly described in the Measures section as a "5-point scale that ranges from 1 to 5." The WAI-SR used the original 7-point scale ranging from 1 to 7. All versions of this article have been corrected. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2022-06516-001.) Based on the social-cognitive theory, this study investigated the dynamic association between counseling trainees' self-efficacy and their clients' outcome (i.e., symptom distress), and the mediating effects of therapist- and client-rated working alliance and session quality. Data set included 1,352 sessions conducted by 87 master's level therapist trainees with their 317 clients in China. Before every session, therapists completed a measure of self-efficacy and clients reported their symptom distress; and after every session, both therapists and clients rated their working alliance and session quality. Results showed that, (a) over the course of therapy, the initial level of therapist self-efficacy did not predict how quickly client symptom declined; (b) the initial level of client distress did not predict how quickly therapist self-efficacy increased; and (c) client distress decline was not related to therapist self-efficacy increase over the course of therapy. However, at the session-to-session level, higher therapist self-efficacy before one session significantly predicted lower client distress before the next session, and higher client distress before one session significantly predicted lower therapist self-efficacy before the subsequent session. Therapist and client perceptions of working alliance were both significant mediators, while their session quality ratings were not. Findings supported the dynamic and reciprocal relationship between therapist self-efficacy and client distress at the immediate session-to-session level rather than the overall trajectory level, and revealed its specific mediating mechanism through the relationship building between therapist and client. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
报告了 Xu Li、Feihan Li、Chaihua Lin、Shitao Chen 和 Yuge Han 在《咨询培训生自我效能与来访者结果的动态关系:工作联盟和疗程评估的中介作用》(,高级在线出版,2021 年 11 月 29 日,np)一文中的错误。在文章中,工作联盟量表-简短修订版(WAI-SR)的测量部分被错误地描述为“范围从 1 到 5 的 5 点量表”。WAI-SR 使用原始的 7 点量表,范围从 1 到 7。所有版本的文章都已更正。(原始文章的以下摘要出现在记录 2022-06516-001 中。)基于社会认知理论,本研究调查了咨询培训生自我效能与来访者结果(即症状困扰)之间的动态关联,以及治疗师和来访者评定的工作联盟和疗程质量的中介作用。数据集包括 87 名硕士水平治疗师培训师在中国与 317 名来访者进行的 1352 次疗程。每次疗程前,治疗师完成自我效能测量,来访者报告其症状困扰;每次疗程后,治疗师和来访者都评定工作联盟和疗程质量。结果表明,(a)在治疗过程中,治疗师自我效能的初始水平并不预测来访者症状下降的速度;(b)来访者困扰的初始水平并不预测治疗师自我效能的提高速度;(c)治疗过程中,来访者困扰的下降与治疗师自我效能的提高无关。然而,在疗程内,一次疗程前的较高治疗师自我效能显著预测下一次疗程前的较低来访者困扰,一次疗程前的较高来访者困扰显著预测下一次疗程前的较低治疗师自我效能。治疗师和来访者对工作联盟的看法都是重要的中介因素,而他们对疗程质量的评价则不是。研究结果支持治疗师自我效能和来访者困扰在即时疗程内的动态和相互关系,而不是在整体轨迹水平上,通过治疗师和来访者之间的关系建立揭示了其具体的中介机制。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2022 APA,保留所有权利)。