Department of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
GSK Human Performance Laboratory, Brentford, UK.
Eur J Sport Sci. 2023 Jul;23(7):1334-1344. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2022.2097130. Epub 2022 Jul 20.
Athletes often undertake intensified training loads prior to competition with the goal of functionally overreaching for temporary performance enhancement; however, little is known about the impact of this on cognitive function. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of intensified training induced fatigue on cognitive function, psychological state and performance in trained cyclists. Twenty-three trained male cyclists were randomly assigned to an intensified training group or a control group for two-weeks, followed by a two-week taper period. At baseline, one-week, two-weeks and post-taper, participants undertook a series of cognitive, performance, mood and recovery-stress assessments. The training intervention significantly increased training volume, load and strain by 108%, 116% and 151% respectively. Peak and mean power output on a maximal test and time trial significantly decreased by 4.8% and 9.4% following the two-week training intervention compared to baseline, in addition to a 169% change in total mood disturbance and significant disruption to recovery-stress balance. No change in any cognitive measure was observed across the study period. Following a two-week taper, performance, mood and well-being measures returned to baseline. Two weeks of intensified training resulted in overreaching as identified by performance and psychological measures. Cognitive function was not sensitive to intensified training promoting caution with its use as a measure for the early identification of overreaching.Two-weeks of intensified training significantly increased training volume, load and strain eliciting a state of overreaching in trained male cyclists.Intensified training caused deteriorations in physical performance but did not influence cognitive measures.Mood and recovery-stress balance were negatively affected by intensified training but recovered back to baseline following a two-week taper at a reduced training volume.A two-week taper period following two-weeks of intensified training did not result in improved physiological measures, physical performance parameters or mood above initial baseline values highlighting the need for careful consideration over the purpose, desired outcomes and necessity of intensified training on an individualised basis.
运动员经常在比赛前进行强化训练负荷,以达到暂时提高表现的功能超越;然而,人们对这种训练对认知功能的影响知之甚少。本研究旨在调查强化训练引起的疲劳对训练有素的自行车运动员认知功能、心理状态和表现的影响。23 名训练有素的男性自行车运动员被随机分配到强化训练组或对照组进行两周的训练,然后进行两周的减量期。在基线、一周、两周和减量期后,参与者进行了一系列认知、表现、情绪和恢复压力评估。训练干预使训练量、负荷和应变分别增加了 108%、116%和 151%。与基线相比,两周的训练干预后,最大测试和计时赛的峰值和平均功率输出分别下降了 4.8%和 9.4%,此外,总情绪干扰增加了 169%,恢复压力平衡受到严重干扰。在整个研究期间,没有观察到任何认知测量的变化。经过两周的减量期后,表现、情绪和幸福感指标恢复到基线。两周的强化训练导致了过度训练,这可以通过表现和心理测量来识别。认知功能对强化训练不敏感,因此在早期识别过度训练时要谨慎使用。两周的强化训练显著增加了训练量、负荷和应变,导致训练有素的男性自行车运动员出现过度训练状态。强化训练导致身体表现恶化,但不影响认知测量。情绪和恢复压力平衡受到强化训练的负面影响,但在减少训练量的两周减量期后恢复到基线。在强化训练两周后进行两周的减量期,不会导致生理测量、身体表现参数或情绪改善超过初始基线值,这突出表明需要根据个人情况,仔细考虑强化训练的目的、预期结果和必要性。