Department of Radiology, International University of Health and Welfare Mita Hospital, 1-4-3 Mita, Minato-ku, Tokyo 108-8329, Japan; Department of Radiology, International University of Health and Welfare Narita Hospital, 852 Hatakeda Narita, Chiba 286-0124, Japan.
Department of Radiology, International University of Health and Welfare Narita Hospital, 852 Hatakeda Narita, Chiba 286-0124, Japan; Department of Radiology, The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, 4-6-1 Shirokanedai, Minato-ku, Tokyo 108-8639, Japan.
Magn Reson Imaging. 2022 Oct;92:169-179. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2022.06.014. Epub 2022 Jun 27.
To assess the possibility of reducing the image acquisition time for diffusion-weighted whole-body imaging with background body signal suppression (DWIBS) by denoising with deep learning-based reconstruction (dDLR).
Seventeen patients with prostate cancer who underwent DWIBS by 1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging with a number of excitations of 2 (NEX2) and 8 (NEX8) were prospectively enrolled. The NEX2 image data were processed by dDLR (dDLR-NEX2), and the NEX2, dDLR-NEX2, and NEX8 image data were analyzed. In qualitative analysis, two radiologists rated the perceived coarseness, conspicuity of metastatic lesions (lymph nodes and bone), and overall image quality. The contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs), contrast ratios, and mean apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) of metastatic lesions were calculated in a quantitative analysis.
The image acquisition time of NEX2 was 2.8 times shorter than that of NEX8 (3 min 30 s vs 9 min 48 s). The perceived coarseness and overall image quality scores reported by both readers were significantly higher for dDLR-NEX2 than for NEX2 (P = 0.005-0.040). There was no significant difference between dDLR-NEX2 and NEX8 in the qualitative analysis. The CNR of bone metastasis was significantly greater for dDLR-NEX2 than for NEX2 and NEX8 (P = 0.012 for both comparisons). The contrast ratios and mean ADCs were not significantly different among the three image types.
dDLR improved the image quality of DWIBS with NEX2. In the context of lymph node and bone metastasis evaluation with DWIBS in patients with prostate cancer, dDLR-NEX2 has potential to be an alternative to NEX8 and reduce the image acquisition time.
通过基于深度学习的重建(dDLR)去噪来评估减少全身弥散加权成像(DWIBS)背景信号抑制(DWIBS)图像采集时间的可能性。
前瞻性纳入 17 例前列腺癌患者,在 1.5T 磁共振成像上进行 DWIBS,采用 2 次激发(NEX2)和 8 次激发(NEX8)。dDLR 处理 NEX2 图像数据(dDLR-NEX2),并对 NEX2、dDLR-NEX2 和 NEX8 图像数据进行分析。在定性分析中,两名放射科医生对感知的粗糙程度、转移性病变(淋巴结和骨骼)的显著性和整体图像质量进行评分。在定量分析中,计算转移性病变的对比噪声比(CNR)、对比率和平均表观扩散系数(ADC)。
NEX2 的图像采集时间比 NEX8 短 2.8 倍(3 分 30 秒 vs 9 分 48 秒)。两位读者报告的 dDLR-NEX2 的感知粗糙程度和整体图像质量评分明显高于 NEX2(P=0.005-0.040)。定性分析中,dDLR-NEX2 与 NEX8 之间无显著差异。与 NEX2 和 NEX8 相比,dDLR-NEX2 中骨转移的 CNR 显著更大(两种比较均 P=0.012)。三种图像类型的对比率和平均 ADC 无显著差异。
dDLR 提高了 NEX2 的 DWIBS 图像质量。在前列腺癌患者的 DWIBS 中评估淋巴结和骨转移时,dDLR-NEX2 可能替代 NEX8 并减少图像采集时间。