Suppr超能文献

奥拉帕利维持治疗后进展的 BRCA1/2 突变复发性上皮性卵巢癌患者后续化疗的疗效:SOLO2/ENGOT Ov-21 试验的事后分析。

Efficacy of subsequent chemotherapy for patients with BRCA1/2-mutated recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer progressing on olaparib versus placebo maintenance: post-hoc analyses of the SOLO2/ENGOT Ov-21 trial.

机构信息

Institut de Cancerologie de l'Ouest, GINECO, GINEGEPS, Centre René Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain, France.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Ann Oncol. 2022 Oct;33(10):1021-1028. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.06.011. Epub 2022 Jun 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the SOLO2 trial (ENGOT Ov-21; NCT01874353), maintenance olaparib in patients with platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer (PSROC) and BRCA mutation significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) and prolonged overall survival (OS). Following disease progression on olaparib, efficacy of subsequent chemotherapy remains unknown.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a post-hoc hypothesis-generating analysis of SOLO2 data to determine the efficacy of different chemotherapy regimens following RECIST disease progression in patients who received olaparib or placebo. We evaluated time to second progression (TTSP) calculated from the date of RECIST progression to the next progression/death.

RESULTS

The study population comprised 147 patients who received chemotherapy as their first subsequent treatment after RECIST progression. Of these, 69 (47%) and 78 (53%) were originally randomized to placebo and olaparib arms, respectively. In the placebo-treated cohort, 27/69 and 42/69 received non-platinum and platinum-based chemotherapy, respectively, compared with 24/78 and 54/78, respectively, in the olaparib-treated cohort. Among patients treated with chemotherapy (N = 147), TTSP was significantly longer in the placebo than in the olaparib arm: 12.1 versus 6.9 months [hazard ratio (HR) 2.17, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.47-3.19]. Similar result was obtained on multivariable analysis adjusting for prognostic factors at RECIST progression (HR 2.13, 95% CI 1.41-3.22). Among patients treated with platinum-based chemotherapy (n = 96), TTSP was significantly longer in the placebo arm: 14.3 versus 7.0 months (HR 2.89, 95% CI 1.73-4.82). Conversely, among patients treated with non-platinum-based chemotherapy (n = 51), the TTSP was comparable in the placebo and olaparib arms: 8.3 versus 6.0 months (HR 1.58, 95% CI 0.86-2.90).

CONCLUSIONS

Following progression from maintenance olaparib in the recurrent setting, the efficacy of platinum-based subsequent chemotherapy seems to be reduced in BRCA1/2-mutated patients with PSROC compared to patients not previously receiving poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi). The optimal strategy for patients who relapse after PARPi is an area of ongoing research.

摘要

背景

在 SOLO2 试验(ENGOT Ov-21;NCT01874353)中,铂类敏感复发性卵巢癌(PSROC)和 BRCA 突变患者接受奥拉帕利维持治疗显著改善了无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。在奥拉帕利治疗后疾病进展后,后续化疗的疗效仍不清楚。

方法

我们对 SOLO2 数据进行了事后假设生成分析,以确定在接受奥拉帕利或安慰剂的患者中,RECIST 进展后,不同化疗方案在随后的疾病进展中的疗效。我们评估了从 RECIST 进展到下一次进展/死亡的时间(TTSP)。

结果

研究人群包括 147 名患者,他们在 RECIST 进展后接受了化疗作为首次后续治疗。其中,69 名(47%)和 78 名(53%)患者分别最初随机分配至安慰剂和奥拉帕利组。在安慰剂治疗组中,27/69 和 42/69 名患者接受了非铂类和铂类化疗,而在奥拉帕利治疗组中,24/78 和 54/78 名患者接受了非铂类和铂类化疗。在接受化疗的患者中(N=147),安慰剂组的 TTSP 明显长于奥拉帕利组:12.1 个月与 6.9 个月[风险比(HR)2.17,95%置信区间(CI)1.47-3.19]。在调整 RECIST 进展时的预后因素后,多变量分析也得到了类似的结果(HR 2.13,95%CI 1.41-3.22)。在接受铂类化疗的患者中(n=96),安慰剂组的 TTSP 明显长于奥拉帕利组:14.3 个月与 7.0 个月(HR 2.89,95%CI 1.73-4.82)。相反,在接受非铂类化疗的患者中(n=51),安慰剂组和奥拉帕利组的 TTSP 无显著差异:8.3 个月与 6.0 个月(HR 1.58,95%CI 0.86-2.90)。

结论

在复发性卵巢癌中接受奥拉帕利维持治疗后进展,与既往未接受聚 ADP 核糖聚合酶抑制剂(PARPi)治疗的 BRCA1/2 突变患者相比,PSROC 患者接受铂类后继发性化疗的疗效似乎降低。PARPi 后复发患者的最佳治疗策略是一个正在进行研究的领域。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验