Association de Recherche Cancers Gynécologiques (ARCAGY)-Groupe d'Investigateurs Nationaux pour l'Etude des Cancers Ovariens (GINECO), Paris; GINECO, Paris.
GINECO, Paris; Department of Medical Oncology, Groupe Hospitalier Diaconesses Croix Saint-Simon, Paris, France.
Ann Oncol. 2023 Dec;34(12):1152-1164. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.09.3110. Epub 2023 Oct 4.
Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor maintenance therapy is the standard of care for some patients with advanced ovarian cancer. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of PARP inhibitor rechallenge.
This randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial (NCT03106987) enrolled patients with platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer who had received one prior PARP inhibitor therapy for ≥18 and ≥12 months in the BRCA-mutated and non-BRCA-mutated cohorts, respectively, following first-line chemotherapy or for ≥12 and ≥6 months, respectively, following a second or subsequent line of chemotherapy. Patients were in response following their last platinum-based chemotherapy regimen and were randomized 2 : 1 to maintenance olaparib tablets 300 mg twice daily or placebo. Investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary endpoint.
Seventy four patients in the BRCA-mutated cohort were randomized to olaparib and 38 to placebo, and 72 patients in the non-BRCA-mutated cohort were randomized to olaparib and 36 to placebo; >85% of patients in both cohorts had received ≥3 prior lines of chemotherapy. In the BRCA-mutated cohort, the median PFS was 4.3 months with olaparib versus 2.8 months with placebo [hazard ratio (HR) 0.57; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.37-0.87; P = 0.022]; 1-year PFS rates were 19% versus 0% (Kaplan-Meier estimates). In the non-BRCA-mutated cohort, median PFS was 5.3 months for olaparib versus 2.8 months for placebo (HR 0.43; 95% CI 0.26-0.71; P = 0.0023); 1-year PFS rates were 14% versus 0% (Kaplan-Meier estimates). No new safety signals were identified with olaparib rechallenge.
In ovarian cancer patients previously treated with one prior PARP inhibitor and at least two lines of platinum-based chemotherapy, maintenance olaparib rechallenge provided a statistically significant, albeit modest, PFS improvement over placebo in both the BRCA-mutated and non-BRCA-mutated cohorts, with a proportion of patients in the maintenance olaparib rechallenge arm of both cohorts remaining progression free at 1 year.
聚(ADP-核糖)聚合酶(PARP)抑制剂维持治疗是某些晚期卵巢癌患者的标准治疗方法。我们评估了 PARP 抑制剂再挑战的疗效和安全性。
这是一项随机、双盲、多中心试验(NCT03106987),纳入了铂类敏感复发性卵巢癌患者,这些患者在一线化疗后,BRCA 突变亚组中接受了至少 1 次 PARP 抑制剂治疗,且持续时间≥18 个月,非 BRCA 突变亚组中接受了至少 1 次 PARP 抑制剂治疗,且持续时间≥12 个月,随后接受二线或后续化疗。患者在最后一次基于铂类的化疗方案后有反应,并按 2:1 随机分配至每日两次口服奥拉帕利片 300 mg 或安慰剂。研究者评估的无进展生存期(PFS)是主要终点。
BRCA 突变亚组中 74 例患者随机分配至奥拉帕利组,38 例患者随机分配至安慰剂组,非 BRCA 突变亚组中 72 例患者随机分配至奥拉帕利组,36 例患者随机分配至安慰剂组;两个亚组中均有超过 85%的患者接受了≥3 线化疗。在 BRCA 突变亚组中,奥拉帕利的中位 PFS 为 4.3 个月,安慰剂为 2.8 个月[风险比(HR)0.57;95%置信区间(CI)0.37-0.87;P=0.022];1 年 PFS 率分别为 19%和 0%(Kaplan-Meier 估计值)。在非 BRCA 突变亚组中,奥拉帕利的中位 PFS 为 5.3 个月,安慰剂为 2.8 个月(HR 0.43;95%CI 0.26-0.71;P=0.0023);1 年 PFS 率分别为 14%和 0%(Kaplan-Meier 估计值)。奥拉帕利再挑战未发现新的安全性信号。
在先前接受过一次 PARP 抑制剂治疗且至少接受过两线铂类化疗的卵巢癌患者中,与安慰剂相比,奥拉帕利再挑战在 BRCA 突变和非 BRCA 突变亚组中均显著延长了 PFS,但获益程度较轻,两个亚组中接受奥拉帕利再挑战的患者中有相当一部分在 1 年时仍无疾病进展。