• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不良童年经历(AUDACE)后酒精使用障碍的脆弱性:一项纵向 fMRI 研究的方案,评估复发的神经心理生物学风险因素。

Vulnerability for alcohol use disorder after adverse childhood experiences (AUDACE): protocol for a longitudinal fMRI study assessing neuropsychobiological risk factors for relapse.

机构信息

Department of Addictive Behaviour and Addiction Medicine, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.

Department of Psychology, School of Social Sciences, University of Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 30;12(6):e058645. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058645.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058645
PMID:35772833
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9247669/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Adverse childhood experiences (ACE) are common and may predispose affected individuals to various health problems, including alcohol use disorder (AUD). Although a relationship between ACE and AUD has been well-established, potential mechanisms that may underlie this relationship remain to be elucidated. The importance of these mechanisms with respect to relapse risk is of particular interest, given the clinical relevance of relapse in addictions. Thus, the aim of this study is to longitudinally assess the role of clinically relevant variables in the relationship between ACE and AUD, namely stress sensitivity, emotion processing, cue reactivity and cognitive functioning (response inhibition and working memory), in relation to relapse risk.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

In this observational, longitudinal case-control study, 36 patients with AUD and heavy drinkers with varying degrees of ACE from a previous project (NCT03758053) as well as newly recruited participants from the same study population will be assessed. Besides measuring long-term relapse in AUD by re-examining these 36 previous participants after 2-2.5 years, factors contributing to short-term relapse will be examined by reassessing all participants on a 3-month follow-up. Furthermore, participants with no or mild ACE will be compared with participants with moderate to severe ACE to assess between-subject differences in risk factors for AUD. Questionnaires and interviews will thus be used to cover individuals' drinking behaviour and ACE. Emotion processing, stress sensitivity, cue reactivity and cognitive functioning will be assessed using task-based functional MRI (fMRI). Additionally, saliva cortisol and blood samples will be taken to measure hormonal stress response and to perform genome wide association analyses, respectively. The general linear model will be applied on the first level fMRI analyses, whereas for the second level analyses and analyses of behavioural data, t-tests, regression analyses, repeated-measures and one-way analysis of variances will be used.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study has been approved by the ethics committee of the Medical Faculty Mannheim of Heidelberg University (ethics approval number: 2018-560N-MA with amendment from 29 June 2021). The findings of this study will be presented at conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05048758; Pre-results, clinicaltrials.gov.

摘要

背景

不良的童年经历(ACE)很常见,可能使受影响的个体易患各种健康问题,包括酒精使用障碍(AUD)。虽然 ACE 与 AUD 之间的关系已经得到充分证实,但潜在的机制仍有待阐明。鉴于成瘾复发的临床相关性,这些机制对复发风险的重要性尤其值得关注。因此,本研究旨在纵向评估临床上相关变量在 ACE 与 AUD 之间关系中的作用,即应激敏感性、情绪处理、线索反应和认知功能(反应抑制和工作记忆)与复发风险的关系。

方法和分析

在这项观察性、纵向病例对照研究中,将来自先前项目(NCT03758053)的 36 名 AUD 患者和具有不同程度 ACE 的重度饮酒者以及来自同一研究人群的新招募参与者进行评估。除了通过在 2-2.5 年后重新检查这 36 名先前参与者来测量 AUD 的长期复发外,还将通过在 3 个月的随访中重新检查所有参与者来检查短期复发的促成因素。此外,将无或轻度 ACE 的参与者与中度至重度 ACE 的参与者进行比较,以评估 AUD 风险因素的个体间差异。问卷和访谈将用于涵盖个体的饮酒行为和 ACE。使用基于任务的功能磁共振成像(fMRI)评估情绪处理、应激敏感性、线索反应和认知功能。此外,将采集唾液皮质醇和血液样本,分别测量激素应激反应和进行全基因组关联分析。将应用广义线性模型进行第一级 fMRI 分析,而对于第二级分析和行为数据的分析,将使用 t 检验、回归分析、重复测量和单向方差分析。

伦理和传播

本研究已获得海德堡大学曼海姆医学系伦理委员会的批准(伦理批准号:2018-560N-MA,于 2021 年 6 月 29 日修订)。本研究的结果将在会议上公布,并发表在同行评议的期刊上。

试验注册编号

NCT05048758;预结果,clinicaltrials.gov。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d27/9247669/1d311d9148af/bmjopen-2021-058645f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d27/9247669/1d311d9148af/bmjopen-2021-058645f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d27/9247669/1d311d9148af/bmjopen-2021-058645f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Vulnerability for alcohol use disorder after adverse childhood experiences (AUDACE): protocol for a longitudinal fMRI study assessing neuropsychobiological risk factors for relapse.不良童年经历(AUDACE)后酒精使用障碍的脆弱性:一项纵向 fMRI 研究的方案,评估复发的神经心理生物学风险因素。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 30;12(6):e058645. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058645.
2
Effects of chess-based cognitive remediation training as therapy add-on in alcohol and tobacco use disorders: protocol of a randomised, controlled clinical fMRI trial.基于棋类的认知矫正训练作为酒精和烟草使用障碍治疗附加手段的效果:一项随机对照临床 fMRI 试验的方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 6;12(9):e057707. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057707.
3
Lack of amygdala habituation to negative emotional faces in alcohol use disorder and the relation to adverse childhood experiences.酒精使用障碍患者杏仁核对负面情绪面孔缺乏习惯化及其与童年不良经历的关系。
Addict Biol. 2023 Jan;28(1):e13251. doi: 10.1111/adb.13251.
4
Effect of environmental enrichment on relapse rates in patients with severe alcohol use disorder: protocol for a randomised controlled trial.环境强化对重度酒精使用障碍患者复发率的影响:一项随机对照试验的方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 May 12;13(5):e069249. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069249.
5
Protocol for the Project SAVE randomised controlled trial examining CBT for insomnia among veterans in treatment for alcohol use disorder.项目 SAVE 随机对照试验方案,该试验旨在调查认知行为疗法(CBT)在治疗酒精使用障碍的退伍军人中治疗失眠的效果。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jun 8;11(6):e045667. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045667.
6
Using mind control to modify cue-reactivity in AUD: the impact of mindfulness-based relapse prevention on real-time fMRI neurofeedback to modify cue-reactivity in alcohol use disorder: a randomized controlled trial.使用意念控制来改变 AUD 中的线索反应:基于正念的复发预防对实时 fMRI 神经反馈改变酒精使用障碍中线索反应的影响:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Jun 16;20(1):309. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02717-7.
7
Combining online Community Reinforcement and Family Training (CRAFT) with a parent-training programme for parents with partners suffering from alcohol use disorder: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.将在线社区强化与家庭训练(CRAFT)与针对伴侣患有酒精使用障碍的父母的家长培训计划相结合:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2018 Aug 10;8(8):e020879. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020879.
8
Vulnerability for new episodes in recurrent major depressive disorder: protocol for the longitudinal DELTA-neuroimaging cohort study.复发性重度抑郁症新发作的易感性:纵向DELTA神经影像学队列研究方案
BMJ Open. 2016 Mar 1;6(3):e009510. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009510.
9
ON-ICE trial: Investigation of the combined effects of oxytocin and naltrexone on stress-induced and alcohol cue-induced craving in alcohol use disorder-Study protocol of a phase II randomised double-blind placebo-controlled parallel-group trial.ON-ICE 试验:研究催产素和纳曲酮联合对酒精使用障碍患者应激和酒精线索诱发的渴求的综合影响 - 一项 II 期随机双盲安慰剂对照平行组试验的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 11;12(4):e059672. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059672.
10
Stress vulnerability and alcohol use and consequences: From human laboratory studies to clinical outcomes.压力易损性与饮酒及其后果:从人类实验室研究到临床结局。
Alcohol. 2018 Nov;72:75-88. doi: 10.1016/j.alcohol.2018.06.001. Epub 2018 Jun 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) and substance use disorder (SUD): A scoping review.不良童年经历(ACEs)与物质使用障碍(SUD):范围综述。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021 Apr 1;221:108563. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.108563. Epub 2021 Jan 29.
2
Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.204 个国家和地区 1990-2019 年 369 种疾病和伤害导致的全球负担:2019 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
Lancet. 2020 Oct 17;396(10258):1204-1222. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30925-9.
3
Psychiatric comorbidities in alcohol use disorder.
酒精使用障碍中的精神共病
Lancet Psychiatry. 2019 Dec;6(12):1068-1080. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30222-6. Epub 2019 Oct 17.
4
The Prevalence and Consequences of Adverse Childhood Experiences in the German Population.德国人群中不良儿童经历的流行率及其后果。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2019 Sep 20;116(38):635-642. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2019.0635.
5
Prevalence of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) among US children.美国儿童不良童年经历(ACEs)的发生率。
Child Abuse Negl. 2019 Jun;92:209-218. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.04.010. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
6
How does childhood maltreatment influence ensuing cognitive functioning among people with the exposure of childhood maltreatment? A systematic review of prospective cohort studies.童年期虐待如何影响暴露于童年期虐待的人群随后的认知功能?前瞻性队列研究的系统评价。
J Affect Disord. 2019 Jun 1;252:278-293. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.04.026. Epub 2019 Apr 9.
7
Child maltreatment and the development of substance use and disorder.儿童虐待与物质使用及障碍的发展
Neurobiol Stress. 2019 Jan 7;10:100144. doi: 10.1016/j.ynstr.2018.100144. eCollection 2019 Feb.
8
Cognitive impairment in substance use disorders.物质使用障碍中的认知障碍。
CNS Spectr. 2019 Feb;24(1):102-113. doi: 10.1017/S1092852918001426. Epub 2018 Dec 28.
9
Stress, sensitive periods, and substance abuse.压力、敏感期与药物滥用。
Neurobiol Stress. 2018 Nov 27;10:100140. doi: 10.1016/j.ynstr.2018.100140. eCollection 2019 Feb.
10
Retention strategies in longitudinal cohort studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.纵向队列研究中的保留策略:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Nov 26;18(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0586-7.