农村澳大利亚原住民与非原住民对 COVID-19 风险和影响的调查回应比较:对健康传播的启示。

A comparison of rural Australian First Nations and Non-First Nations survey responses to COVID-19 risks and impacts: implications for health communications.

机构信息

University of Wollongong, School of Health and Society, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.

Charles Sturt University, Bathurst, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2022 Jun 30;22(1):1276. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13643-6.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This study investigated differences between rural Australian First Nations and non-First Nations survey respondents' perceptions of COVID-19-related risks and analysed other variables that could predict an exacerbation of anxiety related to COVID-19 harms.

METHODS

A cross-sectional online and paper survey of rural residents from the western regions of NSW, Australia, was conducted. Descriptive and multivariate statistical analyses were used to assess links between First Nations status and demographic measures including postcode, age, gender, education, rural or town/village location, proximity to medical services and living situation. The analysis included five items related to perceptions about COVID-19: perceived likelihood of contracting COVID-19 in the next 12 months, perceived harmfulness of the virus, how often people felt afraid, perception about respondents' ability to do something about the virus and perceived economic impacts of the pandemic.

RESULTS

There were significant differences between First Nations (n=60) and non-First Nations (n= 639) respondents across all sociodemographic categories. The results reflect a significantly higher level of anxiety among the First Nations Australians in the sample: they felt afraid more often, felt it was highly likely they would catch the virus and if they did catch the virus perceived that it would be very harmful. Living with children under eighteen years of age and in small rural towns were key factors linked to feeling afraid of COVID-19 and First Nations status.

CONCLUSION

Health risk communication in pandemic response should include an equitable focus on rural areas, recognising that First Nations Australians are a significant proportion of the rural population with different risk factors and concerns than those of non-First Nations Australians. This principle of First Nations-led design is critical to all health policy and planning. The Australian Government should include rural areas in planning pandemic responses, recognising that First Nations populations are a significant proportion of the rural population creating syndemic conditions.

摘要

简介

本研究调查了澳大利亚农村地区的原住民和非原住民调查对象对 COVID-19 相关风险的看法的差异,并分析了其他可能预测与 COVID-19 危害相关的焦虑加剧的变量。

方法

对澳大利亚新南威尔士州西部地区的农村居民进行了横断面在线和纸质调查。采用描述性和多变量统计分析方法,评估原住民身份与人口统计学指标(包括邮政编码、年龄、性别、教育程度、农村或城镇/村庄位置、与医疗服务的距离和居住情况)之间的联系。分析包括与对 COVID-19 的看法相关的五个项目:在未来 12 个月内感染 COVID-19的可能性、病毒的危害性、人们感到恐惧的频率、对受访者应对病毒能力的看法以及大流行对经济的影响。

结果

在所有社会人口统计学类别中,原住民(n=60)和非原住民(n=639)受访者之间存在显著差异。结果反映了样本中澳大利亚原住民的焦虑水平明显更高:他们更频繁地感到恐惧,认为自己感染病毒的可能性很高,如果感染了病毒,他们认为病毒的危害性非常大。与 18 岁以下的儿童一起生活和居住在小型农村城镇是感到害怕 COVID-19的关键因素,也是与原住民身份有关的关键因素。

结论

大流行应对中的健康风险沟通应包括公平关注农村地区,认识到原住民是农村人口的重要组成部分,与非原住民澳大利亚人相比,他们有不同的风险因素和关注点。这一原住民主导设计的原则对于所有卫生政策和规划都至关重要。澳大利亚政府应在规划大流行应对措施时将农村地区纳入考虑范围,认识到原住民人口是农村人口的重要组成部分,会产生并发条件。

相似文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索