• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

软性机器人技术和功能性电刺激在 SCI 患者手部功能恢复中的应用进展:叙述性综述、临床指南和未来方向。

Soft robotics and functional electrical stimulation advances for restoring hand function in people with SCI: a narrative review, clinical guidelines and future directions.

机构信息

Biomedical Engineering, School of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.

College of Health Sciences, School of Health, Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, North Rockhampton, Australia.

出版信息

J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2022 Jun 30;19(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12984-022-01043-1.

DOI:10.1186/s12984-022-01043-1
PMID:35773733
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9245887/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recovery of hand function is crucial for the independence of people with spinal cord injury (SCI). Wearable devices based on soft robotics (SR) or functional electrical stimulation (FES) have been employed to assist the recovery of hand function both during activities of daily living (ADLs) and during therapy. However, the implementation of these wearable devices has not been compiled in a review focusing on the functional outcomes they can activate/elicit/stimulate/potentiate. This narrative review aims at providing a guide both for engineers to help in the development of new technologies and for clinicians to serve as clinical guidelines based on the available technology in order to assist and/or recover hand function in people with SCI.

METHODS

A literature search was performed in Scopus, Pubmed and IEEE Xplore for articles involving SR devices or FES systems designed for hand therapy or assistance, published since 2010. Only studies that reported functional outcomes from individuals with SCI were selected. The final collections of both groups (SR and FES) were analysed based on the technical aspects and reported functional outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 37 out of 1101 articles were selected, 12 regarding SR and 25 involving FES devices. Most studies were limited to research prototypes, designed either for assistance or therapy. From an engineering perspective, technological improvements for home-based use such as portability, donning/doffing and the time spent with calibration were identified. From the clinician point of view, the most suitable technical features (e.g., user intent detection) and assessment tools should be determined according to the particular patient condition. A wide range of functional assessment tests were adopted, moreover, most studies used non-standardized tests.

CONCLUSION

SR and FES wearable devices are promising technologies to support hand function recovery in subjects with SCI. Technical improvements in aspects such as the user intent detection, portability or calibration as well as consistent assessment of functional outcomes were the main identified limitations. These limitations seem to be be preventing the translation into clinical practice of these technological devices created in the laboratory.

摘要

背景

手部功能的恢复对于脊髓损伤(SCI)患者的独立性至关重要。基于软机器人(SR)或功能性电刺激(FES)的可穿戴设备已被用于辅助日常生活活动(ADL)和治疗期间手部功能的恢复。然而,这些可穿戴设备的实施并未在一篇综述中汇总,该综述重点关注它们可以激活/引出/刺激/增强的功能结果。本叙事性综述旨在为工程师提供指导,帮助他们开发新技术,为临床医生提供临床指南,基于现有的技术来辅助和/或恢复 SCI 患者的手部功能。

方法

在 Scopus、Pubmed 和 IEEE Xplore 中进行了文献检索,检索了自 2010 年以来设计用于手部治疗或辅助的 SR 设备或 FES 系统的文章。仅选择报告了 SCI 患者功能结果的研究。根据技术方面和报告的功能结果对两组(SR 和 FES)的最终研究进行了分析。

结果

从 1101 篇文章中总共选择了 37 篇,其中 12 篇涉及 SR,25 篇涉及 FES 设备。大多数研究仅限于研究原型,设计用于辅助或治疗。从工程角度来看,确定了用于家庭使用的技术改进,例如便携性、穿戴/脱卸和校准时间。从临床医生的角度来看,应根据特定患者的情况确定最合适的技术特征(例如,用户意图检测)和评估工具。此外,采用了广泛的功能评估测试,而且大多数研究使用非标准化测试。

结论

SR 和 FES 可穿戴设备是支持 SCI 患者手部功能恢复的有前途的技术。在用户意图检测、便携性或校准等方面的技术改进以及功能结果的一致评估方面存在主要的局限性。这些局限性似乎阻止了实验室中创建的这些技术设备转化为临床实践。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db52/9248126/a6e53879fd8f/12984_2022_1043_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db52/9248126/148dcce91e94/12984_2022_1043_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db52/9248126/e117313c03d0/12984_2022_1043_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db52/9248126/a6e53879fd8f/12984_2022_1043_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db52/9248126/148dcce91e94/12984_2022_1043_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db52/9248126/e117313c03d0/12984_2022_1043_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db52/9248126/a6e53879fd8f/12984_2022_1043_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Soft robotics and functional electrical stimulation advances for restoring hand function in people with SCI: a narrative review, clinical guidelines and future directions.软性机器人技术和功能性电刺激在 SCI 患者手部功能恢复中的应用进展:叙述性综述、临床指南和未来方向。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2022 Jun 30;19(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12984-022-01043-1.
2
A review of methods for achieving upper limb movement following spinal cord injury through hybrid muscle stimulation and robotic assistance.脊髓损伤后通过混合肌电刺激和机器人辅助实现上肢运动的方法综述。
Exp Neurol. 2020 Jun;328:113274. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2020.113274. Epub 2020 Mar 5.
3
On the way home: a BCI-FES hand therapy self-managed by sub-acute SCI participants and their caregivers: a usability study.居家康复:由亚急性 SCI 参与者及其照护者自行管理的脑-机接口-功能性电刺激手康复治疗:一项可用性研究。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2021 Feb 25;18(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12984-021-00838-y.
4
Soft robotic devices for hand rehabilitation and assistance: a narrative review.用于手部康复和辅助的软体机器人设备:叙述性综述。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2018 Feb 17;15(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12984-018-0350-6.
5
End-user and clinician perspectives on the viability of wearable functional electrical stimulation garments after stroke and spinal cord injury.脑卒中与脊髓损伤后可穿戴功能性电刺激服的用户和临床医生观点。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2021 Apr;16(3):241-250. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2019.1668974. Epub 2019 Oct 8.
6
[Functional rehabilitation of spinal cord injured persons using neuroprostheses].[使用神经假体对脊髓损伤患者进行功能康复]
Orthopade. 2005 Feb;34(2):144-51. doi: 10.1007/s00132-004-0756-7.
7
Functional walking ability of paraplegic patients: comparison of functional electrical stimulation versus mechanical orthoses.截瘫患者的功能性步行能力:功能性电刺激与机械矫形器的比较
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2013 Aug;23(6):631-8. doi: 10.1007/s00590-012-1049-1. Epub 2012 Jul 22.
8
Hybrid FES-robot cooperative control of ambulatory gait rehabilitation exoskeleton.混合动力 FES-机器人协作控制助行康复外骨骼。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014 Mar 4;11:27. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-11-27.
9
Functional electrical stimulation cycling exercise after spinal cord injury: a systematic review of health and fitness-related outcomes.脊髓损伤后功能性电刺激自行车运动:健康和健身相关结果的系统评价。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2021 Jun 12;18(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12984-021-00882-8.
10
Implanted functional electrical stimulation hand system in adolescents with spinal injuries: an evaluation.脊髓损伤青少年植入式功能性电刺激手部系统:一项评估
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997 Jun;78(6):597-607. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(97)90425-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Hybrid EMG-NMES control for real-time muscle fatigue reduction in bionic hands.用于实时减轻仿生手肌肉疲劳的肌电图-神经肌肉电刺激混合控制
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 2;15(1):22467. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-05829-w.
2
Advances in hemiplegia rehabilitation: modern therapeutic interventions to enhance activities of daily living.偏瘫康复的进展:增强日常生活活动能力的现代治疗干预措施。
Front Neurol. 2025 Mar 28;16:1555990. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1555990. eCollection 2025.
3
Perspectives on Barriers to Use and Benefits of Functional Electrical Stimulation From Australians and New Zealanders With SCI and Clinicians and Researchers in the Field.

本文引用的文献

1
Restoring Hand Functions in People with Tetraplegia through Multi-Contact, Fascicular, and Auto-Pilot Stimulation: A Proof-of-Concept Demonstration.通过多触点、束状和自动驾驶刺激恢复四肢瘫痪患者的手部功能:概念验证演示
J Neurotrauma. 2022 May;39(9-10):627-638. doi: 10.1089/neu.2021.0381. Epub 2022 Feb 2.
2
Implantable brain-computer interface for neuroprosthetic-enabled volitional hand grasp restoration in spinal cord injury.用于脊髓损伤后通过神经假体实现自主手部抓握功能恢复的植入式脑机接口。
Brain Commun. 2021 Oct 21;3(4):fcab248. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcab248. eCollection 2021.
3
A Compact and Lightweight Rehabilitative Exoskeleton to Restore Grasping Functions for People with Hand Paralysis.
澳大利亚和新西兰脊髓损伤患者以及该领域临床医生和研究人员对功能性电刺激使用障碍和益处的看法。
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2025 Winter;31(1):100-112. doi: 10.46292/sci24-00013. Epub 2025 Feb 14.
4
Soft Robotics in Upper Limb Neurorehabilitation and Assistance: Current Clinical Evidence and Recommendations.上肢神经康复与辅助中的软机器人技术:当前临床证据与建议
Soft Robot. 2025 Jun;12(3):303-314. doi: 10.1089/soro.2024.0034. Epub 2024 Dec 30.
5
Specifications and functional impact of a self-triggered grasp neuroprosthesis developed to restore prehension in hemiparetic post-stroke subjects.为恢复中风后偏瘫患者的抓握能力而研发的自触发式抓握神经假体的规格及功能影响。
Biomed Eng Online. 2024 Dec 21;23(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s12938-024-01323-y.
6
Meta-analysis of minimally invasive arthroscopy with sodium hyaluronate for wound healing of knee osteoarthritis treatment in the elderly.老年膝骨关节炎治疗中玻璃酸钠联合微创关节镜治疗对伤口愈合的 Meta 分析。
Int Wound J. 2024 Apr;21(4):e14512. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14512. Epub 2023 Dec 9.
一种紧凑轻便的康复外骨骼,用于恢复手部麻痹患者的抓握功能。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Oct 18;21(20):6900. doi: 10.3390/s21206900.
4
Do somatosensory deficits predict efficacy of neurorehabilitation using neuromuscular electrical stimulation for moderate to severe motor paralysis of the upper limb in chronic stroke?体感缺陷能否预测在慢性卒中中使用神经肌肉电刺激治疗上肢中度至重度运动麻痹的神经康复疗效?
Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2021 Aug 25;14:17562864211039335. doi: 10.1177/17562864211039335. eCollection 2021.
5
Development and feasibility of a soft pneumatic-robotic glove to assist impaired hand function in quadriplegia patients: A pilot study.一种用于辅助四肢瘫痪患者手部功能障碍的软气动机器人手套的开发和可行性:一项初步研究。
J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2021 Jul;27:731-736. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2021.03.012. Epub 2021 Apr 2.
6
A randomised clinical trial comparing 35 Hz versus 50 Hz frequency stimulation effects on hand motor recovery in older adults after stroke.一项比较 35Hz 与 50Hz 频率刺激对手部运动功能恢复影响的随机临床试验:老年卒中患者。
Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 28;11(1):9131. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-88607-8.
7
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
8
Brain-computer interface-triggered functional electrical stimulation therapy for rehabilitation of reaching and grasping after spinal cord injury: a feasibility study.脑-机接口触发的功能性电刺激治疗在脊髓损伤后上肢运动功能康复中的可行性研究。
Spinal Cord Ser Cases. 2021 Mar 19;7(1):24. doi: 10.1038/s41394-020-00380-4.
9
Why brain-controlled neuroprosthetics matter: mechanisms underlying electrical stimulation of muscles and nerves in rehabilitation.为什么脑控神经假体很重要:康复中肌肉和神经电刺激的机制。
Biomed Eng Online. 2020 Nov 4;19(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12938-020-00824-w.
10
Eyes are faster than hands: A soft wearable robot learns user intention from the egocentric view.眼睛比手快:一种柔软可穿戴机器人从自我中心视角学习用户意图。
Sci Robot. 2019 Jan 30;4(26). doi: 10.1126/scirobotics.aav2949.