• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

信息提供与质量。多发性硬化症中共享决策的试点研究。

Information Provision and Quality. A Pilot Study on Shared Decision-Making in Multiple Sclerosis.

机构信息

Tampere University Hospital, Neurology, Tampere, Finland.

University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio Finland.

出版信息

Stud Health Technol Inform. 2022 Jun 29;295:179-182. doi: 10.3233/SHTI220691.

DOI:10.3233/SHTI220691
PMID:35773837
Abstract

The patient as an active participant in decision-making has become an important resource in health care. Shared decision-making (SDM) relies on the patient's easy access to reliable and evidence-based health care information as well as the availability of patient-generated data, such as values and preferences for the health care professional (HCP). The aim of the present pilot study was to evaluate what type of information people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) use in the SDM process, and what are the sources of that information. A semi-structured web-based survey of SDM was conducted through the MS-society in Finland. The results are presented against the Ottawa Decision Support Framework. A total of 27 pwMS participated. We found that all the participants wished to be involved in the decision-making process, but that they seldom found the information provided by HCP to be helpful. Instead, they searched the internet and visited various conversation platforms in social media, such as Facebook groups, for additional information.

摘要

患者作为积极参与决策的一方,已成为医疗保健的重要资源。共同决策(SDM)依赖于患者能够轻松获得可靠的基于证据的医疗保健信息,以及患者生成的数据(如对医疗保健专业人员(HCP)的价值观和偏好)的可用性。本试点研究的目的是评估多发性硬化症(pwMS)患者在 SDM 过程中使用哪些类型的信息,以及这些信息的来源。通过芬兰的多发性硬化症协会,以半结构化的基于网络的方式对 SDM 进行了调查。结果是根据渥太华决策支持框架呈现的。共有 27 名 pwMS 参与了调查。我们发现,所有参与者都希望参与决策过程,但他们发现 HCP 提供的信息很少有帮助。相反,他们在互联网上搜索信息,并访问社交媒体上的各种对话平台,例如 Facebook 群组,以获取其他信息。

相似文献

1
Information Provision and Quality. A Pilot Study on Shared Decision-Making in Multiple Sclerosis.信息提供与质量。多发性硬化症中共享决策的试点研究。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2022 Jun 29;295:179-182. doi: 10.3233/SHTI220691.
2
Decision making process in multiple sclerosis: An Argentine pilot study.多发性硬化症的决策过程:阿根廷试点研究。
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2022 May;61:103751. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2022.103751. Epub 2022 Mar 23.
3
Unmet needs, burden of treatment, and patient engagement in multiple sclerosis: A combined perspective from the MS in the 21st Century Steering Group.多发性硬化症未满足的需求、治疗负担和患者参与:21 世纪多发性硬化症指导小组的综合观点。
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2018 Jan;19:153-160. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2017.11.013. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
4
Psychometric properties of the SDM-Q-9 questionnaire for shared decision-making in multiple sclerosis: item response theory modelling and confirmatory factor analysis.用于多发性硬化症共同决策的SDM-Q-9问卷的心理测量特性:项目反应理论建模与验证性因素分析
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Apr 22;15(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0656-2.
5
Development and pilot testing of an online case-based approach to shared decision making skills training for clinicians.针对临床医生的基于案例的在线共同决策技能培训方法的开发与试点测试。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2014 Nov 1;14:95. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-14-95.
6
The impact of media type on shared decision processes in third-age populations.媒体类型对第三年龄段人群中共享决策过程的影响。
Int J Med Inform. 2018 Apr;112:45-58. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.01.004. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
7
Assessing the effect of an evidence-based patient online educational tool for people with multiple sclerosis called UMIMS-understanding magnetic resonance imaging in multiple sclerosis: study protocol for a double-blind, randomized controlled trial.评估一种名为 UMIMS-understanding magnetic resonance imaging in multiple sclerosis 的基于证据的多发性硬化症患者在线教育工具对患者的影响:一项双盲、随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2020 Dec 9;21(1):1008. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04855-5.
8
Conceptual understanding and applicability of shared decision-making in psychiatric care: An integrative review.精神科护理中共享决策的概念理解和适用性:综合评价。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2021 Aug;28(4):531-548. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12712. Epub 2020 Nov 29.
9
Nurse-led immunotreatment DEcision Coaching In people with Multiple Sclerosis (DECIMS) - Feasibility testing, pilot randomised controlled trial and mixed methods process evaluation.护士主导的免疫治疗决策辅导在多发性硬化症患者中的应用(DECIMS):可行性测试、初步随机对照试验和混合方法过程评估。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2018 Feb;78:26-36. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.08.011. Epub 2017 Aug 26.
10
Interventions for promoting participation in shared decision-making for children with cancer.促进癌症患儿参与共同决策的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jun 6(6):CD008970. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008970.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring Patient Preferences Related to Shared Decision-Making in Chronic Disease Management.探索慢性病管理中与共同决策相关的患者偏好
Cureus. 2024 Sep 25;16(9):e70214. doi: 10.7759/cureus.70214. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
MyMS: An Interface for Patient-Reported Outcomes for Finnish Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis.MyMS:芬兰多发性硬化症患者自我报告结果的界面
Int J MS Care. 2024 Oct 7;26(Q4):273-280. doi: 10.7224/1537-2073.2023-082. eCollection 2024 Oct.
3
Effects of a Digital Care Pathway for Multiple Sclerosis: Observational Study.
基于数字护理路径的多发性硬化症影响:观察性研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Aug 7;11:e51872. doi: 10.2196/51872.
4
Insights for Healthcare Providers on Shared Decision-Making in Multiple Sclerosis: A Narrative Review.医疗保健提供者对多发性硬化症共同决策的见解:一项叙述性综述。
Neurol Ther. 2024 Feb;13(1):21-37. doi: 10.1007/s40120-023-00573-7. Epub 2024 Jan 5.
5
Shared decision-making in patients with multiple sclerosis.多发性硬化症患者的共同决策。
Front Neurol. 2022 Nov 11;13:1063904. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.1063904. eCollection 2022.