Jack Susan M, Davidov Danielle, Stone Cynthia, Ford-Gilboe Marilyn, Kimber Melissa, McKee Christine, MacMillan Harriet L
School of Nursing, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Offord Centre for Child Studies, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
J Adv Nurs. 2023 Apr;79(4):1367-1384. doi: 10.1111/jan.15353. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
To identify factors that influenced: (1) integration of an intimate partner violence intervention into the Nurse-Family Partnership programme and (2) utilization of the intervention with fidelity to the clinical pathway by nurses in their home visits.
A qualitative descriptive study embedded in the intervention arm (n = 7 sites) of a 15-site cluster randomized clinical trial to evaluate the intimate partner violence intervention.
Semi-structured interviews (n = 13) were conducted with supervisors. Nurses at the seven sites shared their experiences in focus groups conducted at two time points (n = 14 focus groups, 12 months after baseline and following collection of client trial data). Qualitative data were generated between May 2012 and September 2016, with this post hoc analysis completed in 2021. Focus group data were analysed using a rapid qualitative analysis technique. Conventional content analysis was used to categorize data from the supervisor interviews.
Integration was negatively impacted by: (1) a lack of centralized programme support and (2) competing programme demands. At the practice level, multiple factors related to supervisor capacity, preservation of the nurse-client relationship and nurse, client and intervention attributes influenced nurses' capacity to address intimate partner violence with fidelity to the clinical pathway. A lack of privacy in home visits was the most common barrier to addressing clients' experiences of violence. The need for increased time for nurses to develop clinical expertise prior to the evaluation of the intervention was also identified.
Before implementing an intimate partner violence intervention, home visitation programmes need to attend to site readiness, provide support to supervisors to facilitate implementation, and provide nurses with time to develop the expertise and clinical judgement required to use a complex intervention whilst also respecting clients' agency to determine when and how they will respond to the violence in their relationships.ImpactWhat problem did the study address? Given the positive impacts that participating in the Nurse-Family Partnership intimate partner violence education had on nurse home visitors' attitudes and confidence to address this type of violence experienced by first-time mothers, it was important to understand what factors contributed to the low fidelity of intervention implementation in practice, a factor that may help to explain the lack of client-level impacts on maternal outcomes. What were the main findings? Implementation of an intimate partner violence intervention in a nurse home visiting programme was influenced by contextual factors at both programme and practice levels. At the practice level, a lack of privacy in the home limited nurses' capacity to use the intervention. Supervisors were identified as having an important role to support nurses develop the expertise to use the intervention. Nurses also consistently balanced the intervention requirements to address intimate partner violence with an understanding of the complexity of this type of violence in young women's lives and respect for clients' agency to determine when and how they will respond to the violence in their relationships. Where and on whom will the research have an impact? These findings will be of interest to: (1) researchers developing and evaluating complex nursing interventions to address intimate partner violence in home visitation programmes and (2) stakeholders leading the implementation of novel innovations in the Nurse-Family Partnership programme.
确定影响以下两方面的因素:(1)将亲密伴侣暴力干预措施纳入护士-家庭伙伴关系项目;(2)护士在进行家访时忠实地按照临床路径使用该干预措施。
一项定性描述性研究,嵌套于一项15个地点的整群随机临床试验的干预组(n = 7个地点)中,以评估亲密伴侣暴力干预措施。
对主管进行了半结构化访谈(n = 13)。七个地点的护士在两个时间点进行的焦点小组讨论中分享了他们的经验(n = 14个焦点小组,基线后12个月以及收集客户试验数据之后)。定性数据于2012年5月至2016年9月期间收集,此项事后分析于2021年完成。焦点小组数据采用快速定性分析技术进行分析。采用常规内容分析法对主管访谈的数据进行分类。
整合受到以下因素的负面影响:(1)缺乏集中的项目支持;(2)相互竞争的项目需求。在实践层面,与主管能力、护士与客户关系的维护以及护士、客户和干预措施属性相关的多个因素影响了护士忠实地按照临床路径处理亲密伴侣暴力的能力。家访时缺乏隐私是处理客户暴力经历的最常见障碍。研究还发现,在评估干预措施之前,需要给护士更多时间来培养临床专业知识。
在实施亲密伴侣暴力干预措施之前,家访项目需要关注场所准备情况,为主管提供支持以促进实施,并给护士留出时间来培养使用复杂干预措施所需的专业知识和临床判断力,同时也要尊重客户决定何时以及如何应对其关系中暴力行为的自主权。
影响
该研究解决了什么问题?鉴于参与护士-家庭伙伴关系亲密伴侣暴力教育对家访护士处理初产妇所经历的此类暴力的态度和信心产生了积极影响,了解哪些因素导致干预措施在实践中的实施保真度较低很重要,这一因素可能有助于解释为何在客户层面缺乏对产妇结局的影响。
主要发现是什么?在护士家访项目中实施亲密伴侣暴力干预措施受到项目层面和实践层面的背景因素影响。在实践层面,家中缺乏隐私限制了护士使用该干预措施的能力。已确定主管在支持护士培养使用该干预措施的专业知识方面发挥着重要作用。护士还始终在处理亲密伴侣暴力的干预措施要求与理解年轻女性生活中此类暴力的复杂性以及尊重客户决定何时以及如何应对其关系中暴力行为的自主权之间取得平衡。
该研究将对哪些方面产生影响?这些发现将引起以下人员的兴趣:(1)开发和评估在家访项目中处理亲密伴侣暴力的复杂护理干预措施的研究人员;(2)在护士-家庭伙伴关系项目中引领新创新实施的利益相关者。