Walker Zachary W, Appah Mary, Aban Inmaculada, Lindeman Brenessa M, Elopre Latesha E, Goepfert Alice R, Hill Samantha V
Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Department of Biostatistics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Med Educ Online. 2022 Dec;27(1):2093692. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2022.2093692.
The USA has become increasingly diverse resulting in greater strides to improve workforce diversity and inclusivity. The objective of this study is to compare the experiences of trainees in Graduate Medical Education who identify as Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender or Questioning (LGBTQ) to the experiences of non-LGBTQ trainees within the medical workplace. We conducted a cross-sectional, exploratory survey from 1 December 2020 to 14 January 2021 at a single, large teaching institution. We collected data anonymously and stored it in a REDCap database. We excluded surveys in which trainees did not respond to sexual orientation. We used contingency tables and Fisher's exact test to identify outcomes associated with sexual orientation and gender identity particularly with regard to professionalism, well-being, and satisfaction with training. We distributed the survey to 840 trainees. 730 trainees were included (23 (3.2%) LGBTQ and 707 (96%) Straight). LGBTQ trainees were more likely to experience offensive remarks based on race/ethnicity (p = 0.03) and sexual orientation (p = 0.01). Secondary analysis based on race found that Blacks and Other were more likely to report differences based on professionalism and satisfaction with their training program. There was no difference seen among LGBTQ trainees based on race. We found trainees who identified as LGBTQ were more likely to experience discrimination/microaggressions. Also, racial and ethnic groups that are underrepresented in medicine were more likely to encounter discrimination and dissatisfaction with their training. More efforts are needed in academics to promote safe and supportive LGBTQ and minority training experiences.
美国的多样性日益增加,这促使人们在改善劳动力多样性和包容性方面取得了更大进展。本研究的目的是比较医学研究生教育中自我认同为女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别或性取向存疑(LGBTQ)的受训人员与非LGBTQ受训人员在医疗工作场所的经历。我们于2020年12月1日至2021年1月14日在一家大型单一教学机构进行了一项横断面探索性调查。我们匿名收集数据并将其存储在REDCap数据库中。我们排除了受训人员未对性取向做出回应的调查。我们使用列联表和费舍尔精确检验来确定与性取向和性别认同相关的结果,特别是在专业精神、幸福感和培训满意度方面。我们向840名受训人员发放了调查问卷。纳入了730名受训人员(23名(3.2%)LGBTQ和707名(96%)异性恋)。LGBTQ受训人员更有可能经历基于种族/民族(p = 0.03)和性取向(p = 0.01)的冒犯性言论。基于种族的二次分析发现,黑人和其他种族的人更有可能报告在专业精神和对培训项目的满意度方面存在差异。LGBTQ受训人员中未发现基于种族的差异。我们发现,自我认同为LGBTQ的受训人员更有可能经历歧视/微侵犯。此外,在医学领域代表性不足的种族和族裔群体更有可能遭遇歧视并对其培训感到不满。学术界需要做出更多努力,以促进安全且支持性的LGBTQ和少数群体培训经历。