Jackson Brianna, Sadler Lois S
School of Nursing, Yale University, Orange, Connecticut, USA.
Child Study Center, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
J Adv Nurs. 2022 Nov;78(11):3495-3516. doi: 10.1111/jan.15341. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
To enhance conceptual clarity and interdisciplinary understanding of structural violence, and to illuminate its implications for contemporary social justice and health equity research, by: (1) synthesizing scholarly literature pertaining to structural violence and health; (2) defining its key attributes, antecedents, consequences and characteristics; (3) contextually situating this phenomenon over time and across disciplines.
A comprehensive review of scholarly health literature pertaining to 'structural violence' or its surrogate term 'structural determinants of health' was guided by a Research and Education Librarian.
In November 2019 and again in April 2021, CINAHL, Embase, Global Health, Medline, PsycINFO, PubMed and Scopus electronic databases were searched for peer-reviewed articles that described structural violence in the context of health. Of the 238 unique records identified, 32 articles were selected for inclusion and comprise the review sample.
Using Beth Rodgers' evolutionary concept analysis method, articles were comparatively analysed to identify key attributes, antecedents and consequences associated with the concept's use in health research.
The five interrelated attributes characterizing structural violence are: power, marginality, oppression, adversity and trauma. Hegemonic social, cultural, economic and political systems serve as antecedents, whilst the consequences of structural violence can be broadly classified as health inequity, injustice and indignity, and social disorganization.
This analysis contributes to conceptual clarity and mutual understanding of the usage, application and significance of structural violence across health disciplines and provides a strong foundation for continued concept development and operationalization. Further research is needed to substantiate the relationship between structural violence and health inequity.
通过以下方式增强对结构性暴力的概念清晰度和跨学科理解,并阐明其对当代社会正义和健康公平研究的影响:(1)综合与结构性暴力和健康相关的学术文献;(2)定义其关键属性、前因、后果和特征;(3)在不同时间和跨学科背景下对这一现象进行定位。
由一名研究与教育馆员指导,对与“结构性暴力”或其替代术语“健康的结构性决定因素”相关的学术健康文献进行全面综述。
2019年11月以及2021年4月,对护理学与健康领域数据库(CINAHL)、荷兰医学文摘数据库(Embase)、全球健康数据库、医学索引数据库(Medline)、心理学文摘数据库(PsycINFO)、医学期刊数据库(PubMed)和文摘与引文数据库(Scopus)等电子数据库进行检索,以查找在健康背景下描述结构性暴力的同行评审文章。在识别出的238条独特记录中,选取了32篇文章纳入并构成综述样本。
采用贝丝·罗杰斯的进化概念分析方法,对文章进行比较分析,以确定与该概念在健康研究中的使用相关的关键属性、前因和后果。
表征结构性暴力的五个相互关联的属性是:权力、边缘化、压迫、逆境和创伤。霸权性的社会、文化、经济和政治制度是其前因,而结构性暴力的后果可大致归类为健康不平等、不公正和侮辱,以及社会混乱。
本分析有助于在各健康学科中明确结构性暴力的概念,并增进对其用法、应用和意义的相互理解,为持续的概念发展和实施提供了坚实基础。需要进一步研究来证实结构性暴力与健康不平等之间的关系。