Leadership Institute for Global Health Transformation, Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Department of Pharmacology, Memory Aging and Cognition Centre, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Front Public Health. 2022 Jun 14;10:868246. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.868246. eCollection 2022.
A global trend toward aging populations means that the challenge of providing adequate long-term care to older people looms large in many countries. In Singapore, a public discourse revolving around the expansion of assisted living to create age-friendly environments in long-term care has emerged. This study examines Singapore's experience in developing regulations for assisted living by documenting the different levels of regulation in place and by identifying the regulatory gaps remaining to govern assisted living. Anchoring in a conceptual framework on the governance of assisted living, different regulatory components of assisted living at the micro-, meso-, and macro-levels are analyzed. Using a case study method, primary and secondary data examining the experiences of governing and implementing assisted living in Singapore were collected. Analysis was conducted using a thematic analysis approach. Micro- and some macro-level regulations, which include admission assessment, staffing, and infrastructural requirements for assisted living, are maturing and evolving, while meso-level regulations, such as operational management, the monitoring framework, and stipulations for training requirements for staff, remain a work-in-progress in Singapore. The regulations for assisted living are currently primarily guided by soft laws, such as practice guidelines; the government has committed toward enacting permanent regulations for all long-term care facilities with the phased implementation of the Health Care Services Act from 2021 to 2023. We conclude that assisted living, despite the early stage of its development in Singapore, is a viable care model that should be expanded to meet the rising demand for care on the part of a majority of older people, who fall in the middle of the care continuum (that is, they can neither live independently nor need complete institutionalization). We also propose five policy recommendations for all aging countries to strengthen the governance of assisted living in long-term care. These include establishing (i) clear provisions on care quality assessment and the redress of grievance, (ii) minimum standards of care, (iii) differential regulations for assisted living, (iv) routine care assessment, and, (v) applying technology in assisted living facilities to address a shortage of care workers.
人口老龄化是一个全球性趋势,这意味着许多国家都面临着为老年人提供充足长期护理的巨大挑战。在新加坡,围绕扩大辅助生活以在长期护理中创造适合老年人居住的环境的公共讨论已经出现。本研究通过记录现有的不同监管水平,并确定仍需监管以管理辅助生活的监管空白,来考察新加坡在制定辅助生活法规方面的经验。本研究以辅助生活治理的概念框架为基础,分析了微观、中观和宏观层面辅助生活的不同监管组成部分。使用案例研究方法,收集了关于新加坡辅助生活治理和实施经验的主要和次要数据。使用主题分析方法进行了分析。微观和一些宏观层面的法规,包括辅助生活的入院评估、人员配备和基础设施要求,正在成熟和发展,而中观层面的法规,如运营管理、监测框架和工作人员培训要求的规定,在新加坡仍在进行中。辅助生活的法规目前主要由软法指导,如实践指南;政府承诺在 2021 年至 2023 年期间分阶段实施《医疗保健服务法》,为所有长期护理设施制定永久性法规。我们的结论是,辅助生活尽管在新加坡的发展处于早期阶段,但它是一种可行的护理模式,应该扩大规模以满足大多数处于护理连续体中间的老年人对护理的需求(即,他们既不能独立生活,也不需要完全机构化)。我们还为所有老龄化国家提出了五项政策建议,以加强长期护理中辅助生活的治理。这些建议包括建立(i)关于护理质量评估和申诉补救的明确规定,(ii)护理最低标准,(iii)辅助生活的差异化法规,(iv)常规护理评估,以及,(v)在辅助生活设施中应用技术,以解决护理人员短缺的问题。